Overcoming Barriers to Mammography Screening: A Quasi-randomised Pragmatic Trial in a Community-based Primary Care Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the leading cancer among women in Singapore. Five years after a population-wide breast cancer screening programme was introduced, screening rates remained relatively low at 41%. Studies have shown decreased screening propensity among medically underserved women typically of minority or socioeconomically disadvantaged status. We conducted a quasi-randomised pragmatic trial aimed at encouraging mammography screening among underscreened or unscreened women in a publicly funded primary care facility in Singapore. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted from May to August 2010. Components of intervention included (1) tailored education, (2) doctor's reminder, and (3) cost reduction. Researchers administered a structured questionnaire to eligible female polyclinic attendees and patient companions aged 40 to 69 years. Individual knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and barriers towards mammography screening were identified and educational messages tailored. Doctor's reminder and cost reduction were implemented additively. RESULTS: Overall, out of 448 participants, 87 (19.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 15.8% to 23.1%) completed mammography screening across 3 arms of study. Participants who received a cost reduction were more likely to attend screening compared to participants in other intervention arms (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.4, 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.5, P = 0.009). Cost of screening, ethnicity, prior screening history, and attitudes towards mammography screening were identified as significant factors predicting mammogram attendance. CONCLUSION: Including a cost reduction component was the most effective intervention that increased mammography screening rates. Women's underlying beliefs, attitudes, and other predisposing factors should also be considered for integration into existing breast cancer screening programmes.

Automated measures of hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers using ultrasound: validation and a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to validate a novel method of assessing hand hygiene compliance using ultrasound transmitters in patient zones and staff tagged with receivers. The secondary objective was to assess the impact of audio reminders and quantified individual feedback. DESIGN: An observational comparison against manual assessment followed by assessment using an open-label randomized control method. SETTING: Patient zones were established in 3 wards of 2 large teaching hospitals, including 88 general and 18 intensive care unit ward beds. PARTICIPANTS: Consented regular ward nursing, medical, and allied health staff. METHODS: Concordance between 40 hours of manual observation using trained hand hygiene auditors and automated measures of opportunities and compliance. Subsequent measured interventions were reminder beeps and written individual feedback. RESULTS: When compared with manual observations, ultrasound monitoring underestimated percentage compliances by a nonsignificant mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) difference of 5.2% (-20.1% to 9.8%; [Formula: see text]). After the intervention, adjusted multivariate analysis showed mean (95% CI) overall compliance in the intervention arm was 6.8% (2.5%-11.1%; [Formula: see text]) higher than in the control arm. Results stratified by compliance at entry and exit showed that the effect of intervention was stronger for compliance at exit than at entry. CONCLUSIONS: Our automated measure of hand hygiene compliance is valid when compared with the traditional gold standard of manual observations. As an interventional tool, ultrasound-based automated hand hygiene audits have significant benefit that can be built upon with enhancements and find increasing acceptance with time.

A novel approach to improve hand hygiene compliance of student nurses.

BACKGROUND: The National University Hospital, Singapore routinely undertakes standardized Hand Hygiene auditing with results produced by ward and by staff type. In 2010 concern was raised over consistently low compliance by nursing students averaging 45% (95% CI 42%-48%) prompting us to explore novel approaches to educating our next generation of nurses to improve their hand hygiene practice.We introduced an experiential learning assignment to final year student nurses on attachment to NUH inclusive of hand hygiene auditor training followed by a period of hand hygiene observation. The training was based on the World Health Organisation (WHO) "My 5 moments for hand hygiene" approach. Upon completion students completed an anonymous questionnaire to evaluate their learning experience. FINDINGS: By 2012, nursing students were 40% (RR: 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.5, p<0.001) more likely to comply with hand hygiene practices. 97.5% (359/368) of nursing students felt that the experience would enhance their own hand hygiene practice and would recommend participating in audits as a learning instrument. CONCLUSIONS: With consideration of all stakeholders a sustainable, flexible, programme was implemented. Experiential learning of hand hygiene was a highly valued educational tool and in our project was directly associated with improved hand hygiene compliance. Feedback demonstrated popularity amongst participants and success in achieving its program objectives. While this does not guarantee long term behavioural change it is intuitive that instilling good habits and messages at the early stages of a career will potentially have significant long-term impact.

An outcomes analysis of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) in a large Asian cohort.

Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) facilitates early discharge, easing demands on inpatient resources and allowing patients the opportunity to restore home life. In Singapore, two large hospitals established a common prospective database in 2006. This study presents an analysis of all enrolled cases over 6 years to consider factors potentially causing adverse outcomes. In this prospective observational study, patients' first OPAT episodes, from initiation to completion, re-admission or early cessation, were recorded and analysed using Cox regression to identify factors associated with clinical deterioration leading to unplanned hospital re-admission. Of 2229 first episodes, 1874 (84.1%) completed treatment in OPAT as planned; 201 episodes (9.0%) were complicated by clinical deterioration and re-admitted. Other patients who failed to complete treatment were either re-admitted for elective procedures, experienced adverse drug reactions or peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications, or had other reasons for not completing treatment. Increased risk of clinical deterioration was associated with homecare OPAT (aHR=2.5, 95% CI 1.7-3.8; P<0.001), age >70 years (aHR=1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.2; P=0.008) and non-private care (aHR=1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.0; P=0.033). Diagnosis and type of antibiotic treatment were not significant risk factors for re-admission. OPAT provides intravenous antibiotics to those who would otherwise remain as hospital inpatients. In this large Asian cohort, clinical factors did not relate to the ability of patients to complete their treatment in OPAT. Criteria identified as significant warrant ongoing consideration as patients are assessed for acceptance into OPAT programmes.

The Singapore field epidemiology service: insights into outbreak management.

Field epidemiology involves the implementation of quick and targeted public health interventions with the aid of epidemiological methods. In this article, we share our practical experiences in outbreak management and in safeguarding the population against novel diseases. Given that cities represent the financial nexuses of the global economy, global health security necessitates the safeguard of cities against epidemic diseases. Singapore's public health landscape has undergone a systemic and irreversible shift with global connectivity, rapid urbanization, ecological change, increased affluence, as well as shifting demographic patterns over the past two decades. Concomitantly, the threat of epidemics, ranging from severe acute respiratory syndrome and influenza A (H1N1) to the resurgence of vector-borne diseases as well as the rise of modern lifestyle-related outbreaks, have worsened difficulties in safeguarding public health amidst much elusiveness and unpredictability. One critical factor that has helped the country overcome these innate and man-made public health vulnerabilities is the development of a resilient field epidemiology service, which includes our enhancement of surveillance and response capacities for outbreak management, and investment in public health leadership. We offer herein the Singapore story as a case study in meeting the challenges of disease control in our modern built environment.

Framing risk in pandemic influenza policy and control.

This article explores differing understandings of 'risk' in relation to pandemic influenza policy and control. After a preliminary overview of methodological and practical problems in risk analysis, ways in which risk was framed and managed in three historical cases were examined. The interdependence between scientific empiricism and political decision-making led to the mismanagement of the 1976 swine influenza scare in the USA. The 2004 H5N1 avian influenza outbreak in Thailand, on the other hand, was undermined by questions of national economic interest and concerns over global health security. Finally, the recent global emergency of pandemic influenza H1N1 in 2009 demonstrated the difficulties of risk management under a context of pre-established perceptions about the characteristics and inevitability of a pandemic. Following the analysis of these cases, a conceptual framework is presented to illustrate ways in which changing relationships between risk assessment, risk perception and risk management can result in differing policy strategies.