Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Child Neurol ; 38(6-7): 389-393, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37455404

ABSTRACT

Pediatric developmental epileptic encephalopathies are often refractory to treatment despite stable antiseizure therapy. The safety profile of diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco) as rescue therapy for seizure clusters was described in a long-term safety study. This post hoc analysis assessed safety and effectiveness within a subpopulation of patients with developmental epileptic encephalopathies. Of 163 treated patients, 64 were diagnosed with ≥1 pediatric developmental epileptic encephalopathy. Among the most common developmental epileptic encephalopathies were Rett syndrome (n = 16), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 9), and Dravet syndrome (n = 7). In the broad pediatric developmental epileptic encephalopathy group, 10.6% of seizure clusters were treated with a second dose, with similar proportions in the 3 individual encephalopathies. Across groups, treatment-emergent adverse event rates ranged from 66.7% to 100%. Only epistaxis (n = 2) was treatment-related and reported in >1 patient. In this long-term safety analysis in patients with developmental epileptic encephalopathies, diazepam nasal spray demonstrated a consistent safety profile, supporting its use in these hard-to-treat patients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02721069).


Subject(s)
Brain Diseases , Epilepsy, Generalized , Epilepsy , Lennox Gastaut Syndrome , Child , Humans , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Diazepam/adverse effects , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy, Generalized/drug therapy , Lennox Gastaut Syndrome/drug therapy , Nasal Sprays , Seizures/drug therapy
2.
Epilepsia ; 62(10): 2485-2495, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34418086

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A Phase 3 open-label safety study (NCT02721069) evaluated long-term safety of diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco) in patients with epilepsy and frequent seizure clusters. METHODS: Patients were 6-65 years old with diagnosed epilepsy and seizure clusters despite stable antiseizure medications. The treatment period was 12 months, with study visits at Day 30 and every 60 days thereafter, after which patients could elect to continue. Doses were based on age and weight. Seizure and treatment information was recorded in diaries. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), nasal irritation, and olfactory changes were recorded. RESULTS: Of 163 patients in the safety population, 117 (71.8%) completed the study. Duration of exposure was ≥12 months for 81.6% of patients. There was one death (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy) and one withdrawal owing to a TEAE (major depression), both considered unlikely to be related to treatment. Diazepam nasal spray was administered 4390 times for 3853 seizure clusters, with 485 clusters treated with a second dose within 24 h; 53.4% of patients had monthly average usage of one to two doses, 41.7% two to five doses, and 4.9% more than five doses. No serious TEAEs were considered to be treatment related. TEAEs possibly or probably related to treatment (n = 30) were most commonly nasal discomfort (6.1%); headache (2.5%); and dysgeusia, epistaxis, and somnolence (1.8% each). Only 13 patients (7.9%) showed nasal irritation, and there were no relevant olfactory changes. The safety profile of diazepam nasal spray was generally similar across subgroups based on age, monthly usage, concomitant benzodiazepine therapy, or seasonal allergy/rhinitis. SIGNIFICANCE: In this large open-label safety study, the safety profile of diazepam nasal spray was consistent with the established profile of rectal diazepam, and the high retention rate supports effectiveness in this population. A second dose was used in only 12.6% of seizure clusters.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy, Generalized , Epilepsy , Olfaction Disorders , Administration, Intranasal , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Brain Damage, Chronic , Child , Death, Sudden , Diazepam/adverse effects , Epilepsy/chemically induced , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy, Generalized/drug therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Nasal Sprays , Seizures/chemically induced , Seizures/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Epilepsia Open ; 6(3): 504-512, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34033266

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Need for rescue therapy differs among patients with seizure clusters. Diazepam nasal spray is approved to treat seizure clusters in patients with epilepsy ≥6 years of age. This analysis used interim data from a phase 3 safety study to assess safety profile and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray using average number of doses/month as a proxy measurement. METHODS: This phase 3, open-label, repeat-dose, safety study of diazepam nasal spray enrolled patients (6-65 years) with epilepsy and need of benzodiazepine rescue. Patients were stratified by average number of doses/month (<2, moderate frequency; 2-5, high frequency; >5, very-high frequency). Safety was evaluated based on treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), assessed nasal irritation, and olfaction. The proportion of treatments given as a second dose was used as an exploratory proxy for effectiveness. RESULTS: Of 175 enrolled patients (data cutoff, October 31, 2019), 158 received ≥1 dose of diazepam nasal spray. Frequency of use was moderate in 43.7% of patients, high in 50.6% of patients, and very high in 5.7% of patients. Patients treated 3397 seizure episodes (moderate frequency, 14.2%; high frequency, 59.9%; very high frequency, 25.8%). Nasal discomfort was the most common treatment-related TEAE in all groups. No notable changes in nasal irritation or olfaction were observed. Second doses represented only 2.5%, 7.5%, and 17.2% of all doses in the moderate-, high-, and very-high-frequency groups, respectively. Overall retention rate was 82.9%, without an observed relationship to frequency of use. SIGNIFICANCE: Frequency of dosing diazepam nasal spray had little impact on the safety/tolerability profile across a range of <2 to >5 doses/month. Effectiveness was suggested for all dosing frequencies by the high proportion of seizure clusters not treated with a second dose. These results support the utility, safety profile, and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray across frequencies of seizure cluster burden.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Nasal Sprays , Administration, Intranasal , Diazepam/adverse effects , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Humans , Seizures/drug therapy
4.
Epilepsia ; 62(6): 1442-1450, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33942315

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco), indicated for acute treatment of frequent seizure activity (seizure clusters) in patients with epilepsy ≥6 years of age, is designed to be a rapid, noninvasive, socially acceptable route of administration. This interim analysis evaluated the safety profile of diazepam nasal spray in patients with and without concomitant use of benzodiazepines, with use of a second dose for a seizure cluster as a proxy for effectiveness. METHODS: A long-term, phase 3, open-label safety study enrolled patients with epilepsy who had seizures despite a stable antiseizure medication regimen. RESULTS: Among 175 patients enrolled by October 31, 2019, a total of 158 were treated with diazepam nasal spray (aged 6-65 years; 53.8% female). Of those, 119 (75.3%) received concomitant benzodiazepines (60, chronic; 59, intermittent); 39 (24.7%) did not. Use of a second dose was similar in patients using chronic concomitant benzodiazepines (second dose in 11.1% [144/1299]) and those with no concomitant benzodiazepines (second dose in 10.3% [41/398]). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred for 80.0% with chronic use of concomitant benzodiazepines and 61.5% without. Cardiorespiratory depression was not reported, and no serious TEAEs were treatment related. Study retention was high: 83.3% in the chronic benzodiazepine group and 76.9% in the no-benzodiazepine group. Findings were similar in a sub-analysis of patients who were (n = 44) or were not (n = 75) taking clobazam. SIGNIFICANCE: This analysis of patients from a long-term study shows a similar safety profile of diazepam nasal spray in patients with and without concomitant benzodiazepines, and consistent with the established profile for diazepam. Use of a single dose of diazepam nasal spray and high study retention rates suggest the effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray in patients irrespective of chronic daily benzodiazepine use. Results were similar in the clobazam sub-analysis. These results support the safety and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray in patients with concomitant benzodiazepine use.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Diazepam/administration & dosage , Diazepam/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Clobazam/therapeutic use , Diazepam/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Sprays , Seizures/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Epilepsia ; 61(5): 935-943, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32338380

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess pharmacokinetics and safety of diazepam nasal spray (NRL-1; VALTOCO®) in pediatric and adult patients with epilepsy in seizure and nonseizure states. METHODS: A single dose of diazepam nasal spray (5, 10, 15, or 20 mg based on weight) was administered during each of two conditions (ictal/peri-ictal and interictal condition) to patients 6-65 years old with partial or generalized epilepsy with motor seizures or seizures with clear alteration of awareness; a second dose was permitted if needed for persistent seizures. Dosing could be interictal or ictal/peri-ictal first, with a washout of ≥14 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were taken at prespecified time points. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), sedation, nasal irritation, nasal mucosal pain, and olfactory changes were assessed. RESULTS: Of 57 patients in the study (mean age = 28.1 years [range = 6-59], 54.4% female, 80.7% white), 49 were included in the primary pharmacokinetic analyses. Diazepam pharmacokinetic profiles were similar under both conditions, with approximately 2-hour median time to mean (SD) maximum plasma concentrations of 164 (88) and 189 (110) ng/mL for ictal/peri-ictal and interictal conditions, respectively; drug exposure during the first 6 hours postdosing was 532 (313) and 615 (368) h•ng/mL, respectively. Seventeen patients (29.8%) reported TEAEs, of whom eight (14%) had treatment-related TEAEs, with those reported in ≥2 patients being dysgeusia (n = 3, 5.3%) and nasal discomfort (n = 2, 3.5%). One patient had serious TEAEs (recurrent seizures, metabolic encephalopathy), which were deemed unrelated to study treatment. No changes in respiratory rate were observed, nor were there clinically relevant changes in sedation, olfaction, nasal irritation, or acute nasal mucosal pain. SIGNIFICANCE: The epileptic conditions (ictal/peri-ictal, interictal) had minimal impact on diazepam nasal spray pharmacokinetics in patients with epilepsy. Therefore, diazepam nasal spray can be administered ictally and interictally. Diazepam nasal spray safety was consistent with the profile of diazepam.


Subject(s)
Diazepam/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Seizures/drug therapy , Administration, Intranasal , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Diazepam/administration & dosage , Diazepam/adverse effects , Diazepam/pharmacokinetics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Sprays , Young Adult
6.
Pediatr Neurol ; 44(4): 289-91, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21397171

ABSTRACT

A 2-year-old girl from a consanguineous marriage was evaluated for refractory seizures that had presented at birth. Since her presentation, she had been treated with pyridoxine and antiepileptic medications. Because she did not manifest the expected clinical response, pyridoxine was discontinued, which led to an increase in clinical events. Cerebrospinal fluid neurotransmitter metabolite chromatography and an assay of serum biomarkers, including pipecolic acid and α-aminoadipic semialdehyde, confirmed the diagnosis of pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy, and genetic testing identified a homozygous mutation in our patient, and in a first cousin with epilepsy. The reintroduction of pyridoxine and addition of folinic acid eventually led to control of her seizures. Early testing of biomarkers may prevent delays in diagnosing pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy. We recommend that all patients presenting with cryptogenic seizures before age 18 months undergo this evaluation.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Epilepsy , Child, Preschool , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Female , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...