Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Public Health Nutr ; 22(5): 776-784, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30587257

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Brazilian Household Food Insecurity Measurement Scale (EBIA) has eight general/adult items applied in all households and six additional items exclusively asked in households with children and/or adolescents (HHCA). Continuing an investigation programme on the adequacy of model-based cut-off points for EBIA, the present study aims to: (i) explore the capacity of properly stratifying HHCA according to food insecurity (FI) severity level by applying only the eight 'generic' items; and (ii) compare it against the fourteen-item scale. DESIGN: Latent class factor analysis (LCFA) models were applied to the answers to the eight general/adult items to identify latent groups corresponding to FI levels and optimal group-separating cut-off points. Analyses involved a thorough classification agreement evaluation and were performed at the national level and by macro-regions. SETTING: Data derived from the cross-sectional Brazilian National Household Sample Survey of 2013. PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of 116 543 households. RESULTS: In all households and investigated domains, LCFA detected four distinct household food (in)security groups (food security and three levels of severity of FI) and the same set of cut-off points (1/2, 4/5 and 6/7). Misclassification in the aggregate data was 0·66 % in adult-only households and 1·06 % in HHCA. Comparison of the scale reduced to eight items with the 'original' fourteen-item scale demonstrated consistency in the classification. In HHCA, the agreement between both classifications was 96·2 %. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate the eight 'generic' items in HHCA can be reliably used when it is not possible to apply the fourteen-item scale.

2.
J Nutr ; 147(7): 1356-1365, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28566526

ABSTRACT

Background: This is the second part of a model-based approach to examine the suitability of the current cutoffs applied to the raw score of the Brazilian Household Food Insecurity Measurement Scale [Escala Brasileira de Insegurança Alimentar (EBIA)]. The approach allows identification of homogeneous groups who correspond to severity levels of food insecurity (FI) and, by extension, discriminant cutoffs able to accurately distinguish these groups.Objective: This study aims to examine whether the model-based approach for identifying optimal cutoffs first implemented in a local sample is replicated in a countrywide representative sample.Methods: Data were derived from the Brazilian National Household Sample Survey of 2013 (n = 116,543 households). Latent class factor analysis (LCFA) models from 2 to 5 classes were applied to the scale's items to identify the number of underlying FI latent classes. Next, identification of optimal cutoffs on the overall raw score was ascertained from these identified classes. Analyses were conducted in the aggregate data and by macroregions. Finally, model-based classifications (latent classes and groupings identified thereafter) were contrasted to the traditionally used classification.Results: LCFA identified 4 homogeneous groups with a very high degree of class separation (entropy = 0.934-0.975). The following cutoffs were identified in the aggregate data: between 1 and 2 (1/2), 5 and 6 (5/6), and 10 and 11 (10/11) in households with children and/or adolescents <18 y of age (score range: 0-14), and 1/2, between 4 and 5 (4/5), and between 6 and 7 (6/7) in adult-only households (range: 0-8). With minor variations, the same cutoffs were also identified in the macroregions. Although our findings confirm, in general, the classification currently used, the limit of 1/2 (compared with 0/1) for separating the milder from the baseline category emerged consistently in all analyses.Conclusions: Nationwide findings corroborate previous local evidence that households with an overall score of 1 are more akin to those scoring negative on all items. These results may contribute to guide experts' and policymakers' decisions on the most appropriate EBIA cutoffs.


Subject(s)
Food Supply , Brazil , Cities , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Family Characteristics , Food/economics , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Poverty Areas , Socioeconomic Factors
3.
J Nutr ; 146(7): 1356-64, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27281803

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Brazilian Household Food Insecurity Measurement Scale (EBIA) is the main tool for assessing household food insecurity (FI) in Brazil, assisting in monitoring and improving national public policies to promote food security. Based on the sum of item scores, households have been classified into 4 levels of FI, with the use of cutoffs arising from expert discussions informed by psychometric analyses and policy considerations. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify homogeneous latent groups corresponding to levels of FI, examine whether such subgroups could be defined from discriminant cutoffs applied to the overall EBIA raw score, and compare these cutoffs against those currently used. METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based study with a representative sample of 1105 households from a low-income metropolitan area of Rio de Janeiro was conducted. Latent class factor analysis (LCFA) models were applied to the answers to EBIA's items to identify homogeneous groups, obtaining the number of latent classes for FI measured by the scale. Based on this and a thorough classification agreement evaluation, optimal cutoffs for discriminating between different severity levels of FI were ascertained. Model-based grouping and the official EBIA classification cutoffs were also contrasted. RESULTS: LCFA identified 4 homogeneous groups with a very high degree of class separation (entropy = 0.906), endorsing the classification of EBIA as a 4-level measure of FI. Two sets of cutoffs were identified to separate such groups according to household type: 1/2, 5/6, and 10/11 in households with children and adolescents (score range: 0-14); and 1/2, 3/4, and 5/6 in adult-only households (score range: 0-7). CONCLUSION: Although roughly classifying EBIA as in previous studies, the current approach suggests that, in terms of raw score, households endorsing only one item of the scale would be better classified by being placed in the same stratum as those remaining negative on all items.


Subject(s)
Family Characteristics , Food Supply , Food/economics , Models, Theoretical , Brazil , Cities , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Poverty Areas , Socioeconomic Factors
4.
Midwifery ; 28(4): 356-61, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21775034

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: domestic violence during pregnancy remains an unsolved and neglected social problem despite the recognised adverse physical and mental health consequences. OBJECTIVE: to examine the association between domestic violence (psychological violence and physical or sexual violence) and health problems self-reported by pregnant women. METHODS: a cross-sectional analysis from a cohort study of 1,379 pregnant women attending prenatal care in public primary care units in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Data were collected by interviewing women when they enroled for prenatal care. Domestic violence and alcohol abuse were ascertained by validated questionnaires. Referred morbidities, undesirable behaviours and sociodemographic characteristics were also recorded. Univariate analyses were used to estimate prevalence and unadjusted odd ratios. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the independent association between psychological violence and physical or sexual violence during pregnancy and women's health outcomes. FINDINGS: psychological violence and physical or sexual violence were reported by 19.1% (n=263) and 6.5% (n=89) of the pregnant women, respectively. Psychological violence was significantly associated with obstetric problems [odds ratio (OR) 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-2.73], premature rupture of membranes (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.01-2.68), urinary tract infection (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.19-2.42), headache (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.25-2.40) and sexual risk behaviours (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.18-4.41). Physical or sexual violence was significantly associated with: obstetric problems (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.08-2.75), premature rupture of membranes (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.14-3.88), urinary tract infection (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.26-3.34), vaginal bleeding (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.10-3.43) and lack of sexual desire (OR 3.67, 95% CI 2.23-6.09). CONCLUSION: domestic violence during pregnancy was associated with adverse clinical and psychological outcomes for women. These results suggest that a well-organised health-care system and trained health professionals, as well as multisectorial social support, are necessary to prevent or address the negative influence of domestic violence on women's health in Brazil.


Subject(s)
Midwifery/organization & administration , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Spouse Abuse/psychology , Spouse Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Women's Health , Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , Brazil/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Confidence Intervals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression, Postpartum/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Nurse's Role , Nurse-Patient Relations , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Social Support , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
5.
Rev. saúde pública ; 42(5): 877-885, out. 2008. tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-493842

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Identificar os fatores associados à violência doméstica contra gestantes. MÉTODOS: Foram entrevistadas 1.379 gestantes usuárias do Sistema Único de Saúde acompanhadas em unidades básicas de saúde no município de Campinas (SP). Foram analisadas a primeira e a segunda entrevistas de um estudo de coorte, aplicando-se questionário estruturado sobre violência doméstica validado no Brasil, de julho de 2004 a julho de 2006. Foram realizadas análise descritiva e regressão logística múltipla dos dados. RESULTADOS: Do total da amostra, 19,1 por cento (n=263) das gestantes reportaram violência psicológica e 6,5 por cento (n=89) violência física/sexual. Os fatores associados à violência psicológica foram: parceiro íntimo adolescente (p<0,019) e gestante ter presenciado agressão física antes dos 15 anos (p<0,001). Foram associados à violência física/sexual: dificuldade da gestante em comparecer às consultas de pré-natal (p<0,014), parceiro íntimo fazer uso de drogas (p<0,015) e não trabalhar (p<0,048). Os fatores associados à violência psicológica e física/sexual foram: baixa escolaridade da gestante (p<0,013 e p<0,020, respectivamente), gestante responsável pela família (p<0,001 e p=0,017, respectivamente) gestante ter sofrido agressão física na infância (p<0,029 e p<0,038, respectivamente), presença de transtorno mental comum (p<0,001) e parceiro íntimo consumir bebida alcoólica duas ou mais vezes por semana(p<0,001). CONCLUSÕES: Constataram-se altas prevalências das diferentes categorias de violência doméstica praticada pelo parceiro íntimo durante o período gestacional, assim como, com os diversos fatores a elas associados. Mecanismos apropriados para identificação e abordagem da violência doméstica na gestação são necessários, especialmente na atenção primária.


Subject(s)
Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Pregnancy , Spouse Abuse , Battered Women , Domestic Violence , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Risk Factors
6.
Rev Saude Publica ; 42(5): 877-85, 2008 Oct.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18695785

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with domestic violence against pregnant women. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 1,379 pregnant women undergoing antenatal care in basic health care units of the Brazilian Health System, within the municipality of Campinas (Southeastern Brazil). A structured questionnaire on domestic violence, validated in Brazil, was applied between July 2004 and July 2006. The first and second interviews in a cohort study were analyzed. Descriptive and multiple logistic regression analysis of the data were conducted. RESULTS: Psychological violence was reported by 19.1% (n=263) of the total sample of pregnant women and physical/sexual violence was reported by 6.5% (n=89) of them. The factors associated to psychological violence were: adolescent intimate partner (p<0.019) and the pregnant woman had witnessed physical aggression before she was 15 years old (p<0.001). The factors associated to physical/sexual violence were: difficulties encountered by the pregnant woman in attending her antenatal appointments (p<0.014), intimate partner uses drugs (p<0.015) and does not work (p<0.048). The factors associated to psychological and physical/ sexual violence were: low level of education of the interviewee (p<0.013 and p<0.020, respectively), the pregnant woman being responsible for the family (p<0.001 and p=0.017, respectively) pregnant woman had suffered physical aggression during childhood (p<0.029 and p<0.038, respectively), presence of common mental disorder (p<0.001) and intimate partner consumes alcoholic beverage twice or more weekly. (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of different categories of domestic violence by an intimate partner during pregnancy was found as well as different factors associated with them. Appropriate mechanisms are necessary, particularly in primary health care, to identify and deal with domestic violence during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Battered Women/statistics & numerical data , Domestic Violence/statistics & numerical data , Pregnant Women/psychology , Sexual Partners/psychology , Aggression , Battered Women/psychology , Brazil/epidemiology , Domestic Violence/psychology , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Pregnancy , Sex Offenses/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Violence , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...