Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 43(3): 474-477, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35086800

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many radiology departments shifted to working a portion of clinical assignments from home. To determine the effect of working from home on performance, productivity, quality, and safety, we evaluated turnaround time, volume of studies, and error rates on rotations worked from home compared with in the hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The number of studies interpreted per day for each neuroradiologist, turnaround times, and error rates reported to peer learning was identified from April 1, 2020, through September 30, 2020. For each neuroradiologist, mean turnaround times and volumes per day at home versus in the hospital were compared. Similar comparison was performed for STAT studies. RESULTS: During the time period, 2597 CTs (1897 at home, 700 in the hospital) and 3685 MRIs (2601 at home, 1084 in the hospital) were read. By individual neuroradiologists, 57% (4/7) had shorter turnaround time at home and 57% (4/7) demonstrated an increase in the mean number of studies per day read at home. No statistically significant difference was noted in the neuroradiologists' performance while reading STAT studies. Reported error rates were not found to be higher at home, with statistically significantly lower rates when working at home (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Variable productivity and performance of neuroradiologists when working from home versus in the hospital were found, being 57% faster and/or more productive while working at home without an increase in error rates. The decision to work at home versus in the hospital may best be based on local factors, balancing the variability among individual neuroradiologist's and the institution's needs, recognizing that working from home is not a one-size-fits-all phenomenon but requires adaptability for successful implementation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Child , Hospitals , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Radiologists , SARS-CoV-2
2.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 42(5): 951-954, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33414225

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus disease 2 (SARS CoV-2) most commonly presents with respiratory disease, but neurologic complications are being reported. We aimed to investigate the rate of positive neuroimaging findings in children positive for SARS-CoV-2 referred for neuroimaging between March 18 and September 30, 2020. We found that 10% (n = 2) had acute findings. Our results may suggest that in children, neurologic involvement in COVID-19 is rare, neuroimaging has a low yield in diagnosis, and acute neuroimaging should involve careful risk-benefit analysis.


Subject(s)
Brain Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Brain Diseases/epidemiology , Brain Diseases/virology , COVID-19/complications , Neuroimaging , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Male , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...