Experimental study comparing 2 different phacoemulsification systems with intraocular pressure control during steady-state flow and occlusion break surge events.

PURPOSE: To compare peak surge and surge duration time after occlusion break, incision leakage compensation, and passive vacuum for 2 phacoemulsification systems. SETTING: Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Oberkochen, Germany. DESIGN: Laboratory study. METHODS: A spring-eye model was used to test Alcon Centurion Vision and Zeiss Quatera 700 systems. Peak surge and duration was measured after an occlusion break. Quatera tested in flow and vacuum priority modes. Vacuum limits ranged from 300 to 700 mm Hg with intraocular pressure (IOP) set at 30 mm Hg, 55 mm Hg, and 80 mm Hg. IOP vs incision leakage rates of 0 to 15 cc/min and passive vacuum were measured. RESULTS: At 30 mm Hg IOP set point and vacuum limits ranging 300 to 700 mm Hg, the surge duration time after occlusion break ranged 419 to 1740 milliseconds (ms) for Centurion, 284 to 408 ms for Quatera in the flow mode, and 282 to 354 ms for Quatera in the vacuum mode. At 55 mm Hg, values ranged 268 to 1590 ms for Centurion, 258 to 471 ms for Quatera in the flow mode, and 239 to 284 ms for Quatera in the vacuum mode. At 80 mm Hg, values were 243 to 1520 ms for Centurion, 238 to 314 ms for Quatera in the flow mode, and 221 to 279 ms in the vacuum mode. Centurion exhibited slightly less peak surge than the Quatera. At 55 mm Hg: incision leakage rates 0 to 15 cc/min, Quatera held the IOP within ±2 mm Hg of target; Centurion was unable to hold IOP target allowing a 11.7 mm Hg decrease with 32% higher passive vacuum. CONCLUSIONS: Quatera demonstrated slightly higher surge peak values and notably shorter surge duration times after occlusion break than Centurion. Quatera demonstrated better incision leakage compensation and lower passive vacuum than Centurion.

Femtosecond laser capsulotomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a femtosecond laser system to create the capsulotomy. SETTING: Porcine and cadaver eye studies were performed at OptiMedica Corp., Santa Clara, California, USA; the human trial was performed at the Centro Laser, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. DESIGN: Experimental and clinical study. METHODS: Capsulotomies performed by an optical coherence tomography-guided femtosecond laser were evaluated in porcine and human cadaver eyes. Subsequently, the procedure was performed in 39 patients as part of a prospective randomized study of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. The accuracy of the capsulotomy size, shape, and centration were quantified and capsulotomy strength was assessed in the porcine eyes. RESULTS: Laser-created capsulotomies were significantly more precise in size and shape than manually created capsulorhexes. In the patient eyes, the deviation from the intended diameter of the resected capsule disk was 29 µm ± 26 (SD) for the laser technique and 337 ± 258 µm for the manual technique. The mean deviation from circularity was 6% and 20%, respectively. The center of the laser capsulotomies was within 77 ± 47 µm of the intended position. All capsulotomies were complete, with no radial nicks or tears. The strength of laser capsulotomies (porcine subgroup) decreased with increasing pulse energy: 152 ± 21 mN for 3 µJ, 121 ± 16 mN for 6 µJ, and 113 ± 23 mN for 10 µJ. The strength of the manual capsulorhexes was 65 ± 21 mN. CONCLUSION: The femtosecond laser produced capsulotomies that were more precise, accurate, reproducible, and stronger than those created with the conventional manual technique.

The physics of phaco: a review.

Despite its unparalleled success in the field of surgery, the precise mechanism of ultrasonic phacoemulsification cataract extraction remains controversial. We review the relevant peer-reviewed literature on the subject of power generation and tip-tissue interactions to clarify the current status of our knowledge. We conclude that phacoemulsification most likely operates by a combination of mechanisms, including direct action of the vibrating tip against tissue and indirect cavitational effects. Surgeons will benefit from understanding the physical principles underlying phacoemulsification because they will be better able to evaluate the performance of various parameters and different machine settings.