Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (2): CD007062, 2014 Feb 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24578236

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In women with preterm labor, tocolysis has not been shown to improve perinatal mortality; however, it is often given for 48 hours to allow for the corticosteroid effect for fetal maturation. In women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), the use of tocolysis is still controversial. In theory, tocolysis may prolong pregnancy in women with PPROM, thereby allowing for the corticosteroid benefit and reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with prematurity. OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential benefits and harms of tocolysis in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (15 January 2014). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included pregnant women with singleton pregnancies and PPROM (23 weeks to 36 weeks and six days). We included any tocolytic therapy compared to no tocolytic, placebo, or another tocolytic. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All review authors assessed the studies for inclusion. We extracted and quality assessed data. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight studies with a total of 408 women. Seven of the studies compared tocolysis to no tocolysis. One study compared nifedipine to terbutaline. Compared to no tocolysis, tocolysis was not associated with a significant effect on perinatal mortality in women with PPROM (risk ratio (RR) 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 3.29). Tocolysis was associated with longer latency (mean difference (MD) 73.12 hours; 95% CI 20.21 to 126.03; three trials of 198 women) and fewer births within 48 hours (average RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.95; six trials of 354 women; random-effects, Tau² = 0.18, I² = 43%) compared to no tocolysis. However, tocolysis was associated with increased five-minute Apgar of less than seven (RR 6.05; 95% CI 1.65 to 22.23; two trials of 160 women) and increased need for ventilation of the neonate (RR 2.46; 95% CI 1.14 to 5.34; one trial of 81 women). In the subgroup analysis comparing betamimetic to no betamimetics, tocolysis was associated with increased latency and borderline significance for chorioamnionitis. Prophylactic tocolysis with PPROM was associated with increased overall latency, without additional benefits for maternal/neonatal outcomes. For women with PPROM before 34 weeks, there was a significantly increased risk of chorioamnionitis in women who received tocolysis. However, neonatal outcomes were not significantly different. There were no significant differences in maternal/neonatal outcomes in subgroup analyses comparing cox inhibitor versus no tocolysis, calcium channel blocker versus betamimetic, antibiotic, corticosteroid or combined antibiotic/corticosteroid. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggests there is insufficient evidence to support tocolytic therapy for women with PPROM, as there was an increase in maternal chorioamnionitis without significant benefits to the infant. However, studies did not consistently administer latency antibiotics and corticosteroids, both of which are now considered standard of care.


Subject(s)
Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture/drug therapy , Tocolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Nifedipine/adverse effects , Nifedipine/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Terbutaline/adverse effects , Terbutaline/therapeutic use , Tocolysis/methods , Tocolytic Agents/adverse effects
2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (10): CD007062, 2011 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21975760

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In women with preterm labor, tocolysis has not been shown to improve perinatal mortality; however, it is often given for 48 hours to allow for the corticosteroid effect for fetal maturation. In women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), the use of tocolysis is still controversial. In theory, tocolysis may prolong pregnancy in women with PPROM, thereby allowing for the corticosteroid benefit and reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with prematurity. OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential benefits and harms of tocolysis in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (6 April 2011), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to 6 April 2011) and EMBASE (1974 to 6 April 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included pregnant women with singleton pregnancies and PPROM (23 weeks to 36 weeks and six days). We included any tocolytic therapy compared to no tocolytic, placebo, or another tocolytic. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All review authors assessed the studies for inclusion. We extracted and quality assessed data. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight studies with a total of 408 women. Seven of the studies compared tocolysis to no tocolysis. One study compared nifedipine to terbutaline. Compared to no tocolysis, tocolysis was not associated with a significant effect on perinatal mortality in women with PPROM (risk ratio (RR) 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 3.29). Tocolysis was associated with longer latency (mean difference (MD) 73.12 hours; 95% CI 20.21 to 126.03; three trials of 198 women) and fewer births within 48 hours (average RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.95; six trials of 354 women; random-effects, T(2) = 0.18, I(2) = 43%) compared to no tocolysis. However, tocolysis was associated with increased five-minute Apgar of less than seven (RR 6.05; 95% CI 1.65 to 22.23; two trials of 160 women) and increased need for ventilation of the neonate (RR 2.46; 95% CI 1.14 to 5.34; one trial of 81 women). In the subgroup analysis comparing betamimetic to no betamimetics, tocolysis was associated with increased latency and borderline significance for chorioamnionitis. Prophylactic tocolysis with PPROM was associated with increased overall latency, without additional benefits for maternal/neonatal outcomes. For patients with PPROM before 34 weeks, there was a significantly increased risk of chorioamnionitis in women who received tocolysis. However, neonatal outcomes were not significantly different. There were no significant differences in maternal/neonatal outcomes in subgroup analyses comparing cox inhibitor versus no tocolysis, calcium channel blocker versus betamimetic, antibiotic, corticosteroid or combined antibiotic/corticosteroid. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggests there is insufficient evidence to support tocolytic therapy for women with PPROM, as there was an increase in maternal chorioamnionitis without significant benefits to the infant. However, studies did not consistently administer latency antibiotics and corticosteroids, both of which are now considered standard of care.


Subject(s)
Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture/drug therapy , Tocolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Nifedipine/adverse effects , Nifedipine/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Terbutaline/adverse effects , Terbutaline/therapeutic use , Tocolysis/methods , Tocolytic Agents/adverse effects
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 201(2): 163.e1-4, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19560112

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the time interval between elective cerclage removal and spontaneous delivery. METHODS: Singleton pregnancies with McDonald cerclage were evaluated for the interval between elective cerclage removal (36-37 weeks) and spontaneous delivery. We also compared spontaneous delivery within 48 hours after cerclage removal between women with ultrasound-indicated vs history-indicated cerclage. RESULTS: We identified 141 women with elective cerclage removal. The mean interval between removal and delivery was 14 days. Only 11% of women delivered within 48 hours. Women with ultrasound-indicated cerclage were more likely to deliver within 48 hours, compared with women with history-indicated cerclage (odds ratio, 5.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-24.05). CONCLUSION: The mean interval between elective cerclage removal and spontaneous delivery is 14 days. Women with cerclage who achieved 36-37 weeks should be counseled that their chance of spontaneous delivery within 48 hours after elective cerclage removal is only 11%.


Subject(s)
Cerclage, Cervical , Delivery, Obstetric , Obstetric Labor, Premature/surgery , Pregnancy Outcome , Uterine Cervical Incompetence/surgery , Adult , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Obstetric Labor, Premature/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Uterine Cervical Incompetence/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
4.
J Reprod Med ; 54(3): 160-4, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19370901

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify patients requesting postpartum sterilization and compare those who underwent the procedure with those who did not. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of requested postpartum tubal ligations was completed. Demographics and clinical characteristics were analyzed. We analyzed whether the failure to obtain postpartum sterilization resulted in an interval laparoscopic tubal ligation or future pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 135 women requested sterilization, but only 56% received the desired procedure. Time of delivery (OR 2.23, CI 1.08-4.58), body mass index (OR 2.38, CI 1.10-5.16) and gravidity (OR 0.80, CI 0.65-0.97) were significant variables that were different between the 2 groups. Of the women who left the hospital postpartum without a sterilization procedure, 44% received an interval laparoscopic tubal ligation and 18% later became pregnant. CONCLUSION: Postpartum tubal ligations are often not performed despite patient request. Additional measures should be undertaken to ensure that patient requests for postpartum tubal ligation are implemented.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Postpartum Period , Sterilization, Tubal/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Maternal Health Services , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sterilization, Tubal/methods
5.
Obstet Gynecol ; 111(4): 921-6, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18378752

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate if exposure to antenatal corticosteroids was associated with decreased rate of death in neonates born at 23 weeks of gestation. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study performed at three tertiary centers of neonates born at 23 weeks of gestation between 1998 and 2007. Stillbirths, voluntary terminations, or parental elected nonresuscitations were excluded. Clinical and demographic variables were examined to determine possible confounding variables. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the effect of steroids on the odds of death after adjustment for these confounders. RESULTS: The sample included 181 neonates. Of the multiple variables examined (institution, race, diagnosis, illicit drug use, antibiotics, assisted reproduction, birth weight, gender, and route of delivery), only multiple gestations were significantly associated (P

Subject(s)
Betamethasone/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Infant Mortality , Infant, Premature , Betamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Female , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Logistic Models , Male , Obstetric Labor, Premature/mortality , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
6.
Clin Obstet Gynecol ; 50(2): 468-77, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17513932

ABSTRACT

Although it was devised over 50 years ago, only recently controlled randomized trials have evaluated the efficacy of cervical cerclage. Cerclage was originally devised for women with both prior preterm birth (PTB) and cervical changes in the current pregnancy. Evidence suggests that transvaginal cerclage probably prevents second trimester loss/PTB in women with >or=3 PTB/second trimester loss (history-indicated cerclage best placed at 12 to 14 wk); and in women with a prior PTB 16 to 36 weeks and transvaginal ultrasound cervical length<25 mm in the current pregnancy (ultrasound-indicated cerclage at 14 to 23 6/7 wk).


Subject(s)
Cerclage, Cervical , Pregnancy Outcome , Premature Birth/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Incompetence/surgery , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Physical Examination , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/surgery , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...