[Home-care services in the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges for staff and care recipients]. / Ambulante Pflege in den ersten beiden Wellen der COVID-19-Pandemie: Herausforderungen für Personal und Pflegebedürftige.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, people in need of long-term care were among the most vulnerable population groups. Home-care services were under exceptional strain, especially at the beginning of the pandemic. The aim of this study is to examine the situation and problems of care services and the people in need of care during the first two waves of the pandemic in Germany. METHODS: Two cross-sectional studies were conducted during the first two COVID-19 waves (first survey 28 April to 12 May 2020, second survey 12 January to 7 February 2021). In total, data from N = 1029 outpatient care services were included in the analysis. Descriptive measures were used for the analysis. RESULTS: The clients of home-care services were severely burdened in the first two waves of the pandemic. This can be seen on the one hand in an increased risk of illness and increased mortality, and on the other in the loss of various care and support services. The latter also has negative effects on the psychosocial condition of those in need of care, for example. Care services were affected by high staff absenteeism and additional work due to protective measures. DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to immense burdens for people in need of care and home-care services and to a reduction in care services. The deterioration of care provision met with an already tense situation. It has become clear that the provision of care for those in need of care by outpatient care services is not crisis-proof, and that additional challenges such as a pandemic can have dramatic consequences. For the future, reliable structures and readily available emergency plans should be established with concrete instructions for action.

[The situation of informal caregivers of working age in the COVID-19 pandemic-results of an online survey in Germany]. / Die Situation pflegender Angehöriger im erwerbsfähigen Alter in der COVID-19-Pandemie ­ Ergebnisse einer Onlinebefragung in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic have posed major challenges to different groups. One of these are informal caregivers. This study investigates the changes the pandemic has caused for informal caregivers and the extent to which quality of life and burden of care have changed for specific subgroups. METHODS: Data for this cross-sectional study was gathered in the summer of 2020 in a convenient sample of informal caregivers (< 67 years of age, N = 1143). In addition to sociodemographic data, information on the care situation, compatibility of care and work, as well as stress and quality of life was collected in an online survey. The analysis of care situations and compatibility of care and work is done descriptively. Logistic regression models are used for a subgroup analysis of quality of life and care burden. RESULTS: The care situation has changed for 54.7% of participants and has become more time consuming. For 70.8% of respondents, the COVID-19 pandemic has made it even more difficult to balance care-giving and work. However, most respondents were satisfied with their employers' pandemic management (65.9%). A sharp decline in the quality of life and an increase in the burden of care for informal caregivers was ascertained. Both developments are stronger for young and female caregivers and for those caring for people with a greater need of support. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that living situations worsened for a substantial proportion of informal caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Policymakers should recognize additional challenges that informal caregivers have faced since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and how they vary by subgroups. It is important to include home-based informal care as well as other care settings in future pandemic concepts.

Data linkage of German statutory health insurance claims data and care needs assessments preceding a population-based cohort study on nursing home admission.

OBJECTIVES: We perform and evaluate record linkage of German Care Needs Assessment (CNA) data to Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) claims data. The resulting dataset should enable the identification of factors in healthcare predicting the time between the onset of long-term care dependency and the admission to a nursing home in Germany in subsequent analyses. DESIGN: A deterministic record linkage was conducted using the key variables region, sex, date of birth and care level. In further steps, the underlying cause of care dependency (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision (ICD-10)) was added for a higher level of distinction. Before linkage, the suitability of the two datasets for these procedures was assessed. After linkage, the results of each stage were analysed and the resulting dataset was evaluated cross-sectionally with respect to bias generated through this process. SETTING: The study comprises data from the German SHI and Statutory Long-Term Care Insurance. PARTICIPANTS: The study cohort comprised 158 069 individuals who became care dependent in 2006. We obtained CNA data for the year 2006 including 188 935 individuals. RESULTS: We could link CNAs to 66 310 individuals of the original study cohort, corresponding to 42.0%. Records from two federal states could not be matched due to missing data. Linkage rates were lower where more people shared the same attributes. The resulting dataset showed minor differences regarding age, sex and care level compared to the original cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Data linkage between German SHI claims data and CNA data is feasible. Failure to link was mostly attributable to a lack of distinction between individuals using available identifiers. The resulting dataset contains relevant information from both health services provision and functional status of care dependent people and is suitable for further analyses with critical reflection of representativity.

Social Health among German Nursing Home Residents with Dementia during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and the Role of Technology to Promote Social Participation.

The COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted the social health of nursing home residents with dementia due to social isolation. Consequently, the frequency of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms in Dementia (BPSD) might increase. Technological solutions might help safeguard the social health of nursing home residents with dementia. This study investigates the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical outcomes and the availability of social activities and technology to promote social participation in nursing home residents with dementia. The study analyzed cross-sectional data from a follow-up questionnaire nested in a larger national survey of care facilities in Germany. A mixed-methods approach integrated statistical analyses of closed-ended responses and thematic analysis of free-text responses. A total of 417 valid individual responses were received, showing an overall increase in observed BPSD-with anxiety and depression most frequently occurring. Many nursing homes canceled all social activities for residents with dementia, though a few had established procedures to facilitate social participation using technology. Requirements to promote social participation in this population using technology were identified at the micro-, meso-, and macro levels. Technology requirements permeated all three levels. During and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, technology-driven solutions to promote social health among nursing home residents with dementia should be integrated into caregiving procedures.

The influence of primary care quality on nursing home admissions in a multimorbid population with and without dementia in Germany: a retrospective cohort study using health insurance claims data.

BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity poses a challenge for high quality primary care provision for nursing care-dependent people with (PWD) and without (PWOD) dementia. Evidence on the association of primary care quality of multimorbid PWD and PWOD with the event of a nursing home admission (NHA) is missing. This study aimed to investigate the contribution of individual quality of primary care for chronic diseases in multimorbid care-dependent PWD and PWOD on the duration of ongoing residence at home before the occurrence of NHA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among elderly care-dependent PWD and PWOD in Germany for six combinations of chronic diseases using statutory health insurance claims data (2007-2016). Primary care quality was measured by 21 process and outcome indicators for hypertension, diabetes, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure. The primary outcome was time to NHA after initial onset of care-dependency. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the time-to-event between PWD and PWOD. RESULTS: Among 5876 PWD and 12,837 PWOD 5130 NHA occurred. With the highest proportion of NHA for PWD with hypertension and depression and for PWOD with hypertension, diabetes and depression. Average duration until NHA ranged from 6.5 to 8.9 quarters for PWD and from 9.6 to 13.5 quarters for PWOD. Adjusted analyses show consistent associations of the quality of diabetes care with the duration of remaining in one's own home regardless of the presence of dementia. Process indicators assessing guideline-fidelity are associated with remaining in one's home longer, while indicators assessing complications, such as emergency inpatient treatment (HR = 2.67, 95% CI 1.99-3.60 PWD; HR = 2.81, 95% CI 2.28-3.47 PWOD) or lower-limb amputation (HR = 3.10, 95% CI 1.78-5.55 PWD; HR = 2.81, 95% CI 1.94-4.08 PWOD) in PWD and PWOD with hypertension and diabetes, increase the risk of NHA. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of primary care provided to care-dependent multimorbid PWD and POWD, influences the time individuals spend living in their own homes after onset of care-dependency before a NHA. Health care professionals should consider possibilities and barriers of guideline-based, coordinated care for multimorbid care-dependent people. Further research on quality indicator sets that acknowledge the complexity of care for multimorbid elderly populations is needed.

[Predictors of Admission to Nursing Home in Care-Dependent People - A Longitudinal Secondary Data Analysis]. / Prädiktoren für den Eintritt in ein Pflegeheim bei bestehender Pflegebedürftigkeit ­ Eine Sekundärdatenanalyse im Längsschnittdesign.

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of admission to nursing home by means of secondary data analysis of German statutory health insurance claims data and care needs assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal analysis was conducted covering the period 2006-2016 and using routine data. Health insurance data and care needs assessment data for people who became care dependent in 2006 and who lived in their own homes were merged. Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of admission to a nursing home. RESULTS: The study population comprised 48,892 persons. Dementia, cancer of the brain, cognitive impairment, antipsychotics prescriptions, hospitalized fractures, hospital stays over ten days, and higher age had the highest hazard ratios among the predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge about the predictors serves to sensitize health care professionals in the care of people in need of care. It facilitates identification of care needs in community-dwelling persons at an increased risk of admission to a nursing home.

COVID-19 in German Nursing Homes: The Impact of Facilities' Structures on the Morbidity and Mortality of Residents-An Analysis of Two Cross-Sectional Surveys.

The COVID-19 pandemic constitutes an exceptional risk to people living and working in nursing homes (NHs). There were numerous cases and deaths among NH residents, especially at the beginning of the pandemic when no vaccines had yet been developed. Besides regional differences, individual NHs showed vast differences in the number of cases and deaths: while in some, nobody was affected, in others, many people were infected or died. We examine the relationship between facility structures and their effect on infections and deaths of NH residents and infections of staff, while considering the influence of COVID-19 prevalence among the general population on the incidence of infection in NHs. Two nationwide German surveys were conducted during the first and second pandemic waves, comprising responses from n = 1067 NHs. Different hurdle models, with an assumed Bernoulli distribution for zero density and a negative binomial distribution for the count density, were fitted. It can be shown that the probability of an outbreak, and the number of cases/deaths among residents and staff, increased with an increasing number of staff and the general spread of the virus. Therefore, reverse isolation of NH residents was an inadequate form of protection, especially at the beginning of the pandemic.

Application Scenarios for Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Rapid Review.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) holds the promise of supporting nurses' clinical decision-making in complex care situations or conducting tasks that are remote from direct patient interaction, such as documentation processes. There has been an increase in the research and development of AI applications for nursing care, but there is a persistent lack of an extensive overview covering the evidence base for promising application scenarios. OBJECTIVE: This study synthesizes literature on application scenarios for AI in nursing care settings as well as highlights adjacent aspects in the ethical, legal, and social discourse surrounding the application of AI in nursing care. METHODS: Following a rapid review design, PubMed, CINAHL, Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Xplore, Digital Bibliography & Library Project, and Association for Information Systems Library, as well as the libraries of leading AI conferences, were searched in June 2020. Publications of original quantitative and qualitative research, systematic reviews, discussion papers, and essays on the ethical, legal, and social implications published in English were included. Eligible studies were analyzed on the basis of predetermined selection criteria. RESULTS: The titles and abstracts of 7016 publications and 704 full texts were screened, and 292 publications were included. Hospitals were the most prominent study setting, followed by independent living at home; fewer application scenarios were identified for nursing homes or home care. Most studies used machine learning algorithms, whereas expert or hybrid systems were entailed in less than every 10th publication. The application context of focusing on image and signal processing with tracking, monitoring, or the classification of activity and health followed by care coordination and communication, as well as fall detection, was the main purpose of AI applications. Few studies have reported the effects of AI applications on clinical or organizational outcomes, lacking particularly in data gathered outside laboratory conditions. In addition to technological requirements, the reporting and inclusion of certain requirements capture more overarching topics, such as data privacy, safety, and technology acceptance. Ethical, legal, and social implications reflect the discourse on technology use in health care but have mostly not been discussed in meaningful and potentially encompassing detail. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the potential for the application of AI systems in different nursing care settings. Considering the lack of findings on the effectiveness and application of AI systems in real-world scenarios, future research should reflect on a more nursing care-specific perspective toward objectives, outcomes, and benefits. We identify that, crucially, an advancement in technological-societal discourse that surrounds the ethical and legal implications of AI applications in nursing care is a necessary next step. Further, we outline the need for greater participation among all of the stakeholders involved.

Differences in nursing home admission between functionally defined populations in Germany and the association with quality of health care.

BACKGROUND: People prefer to age in place and not move into a nursing home as long as possible. The prevention of cognitive and functional impairments is feasible to support this goal. Health services play a key role in providing support for underlying medical conditions. We examined differentials in nursing home admissions between patient sharing networks in Germany and whether potential variations can be attributed to indicators of health care provision. METHODS: We conducted an ecological study using data of patients of 65 years and above from all 11 AOK statutory health insurance companies in Germany. Nursing home admissions were observed in a cohort of persons becoming initially care-dependent in 2006 (n = 118,213) with a follow-up of up to 10 years. A patient sharing network was constructed and indicators for quality of health care were calculated based on data of up to 6.6 million patients per year. Community detection was applied to gain distinct patient populations. Analyses were conducted descriptively and through regression analyses to identify the variation explained by included quality indicators. RESULTS: The difference in the proportion of nursing home admissions between identified clusters shows an interquartile range (IQR) of 12.6% and the average time between onset of care-dependency and admission to a nursing home an IQR of 10,4 quarters. Included quality indicators attributed for 40% of these variations for the proportion of nursing home admissions and 49% for the time until nursing home admission, respectively. Indicators of process quality showed the single highest contribution. Effects of single indicators were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Health services can support persons in their preference to age in place. Research and discussion on adequate health care for care-dependent persons and on conditions, where nursing home admission may be beneficial, is necessary.

Effectiveness of Digital Technologies to Support Nursing Care: Results of a Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: The field of digital technologies being developed or applied to support nursing care is extensive. The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview on technologies for which results on positive or negative effects on persons in need of care, caregivers or care institutions are available and to appraise the reliability of these results. METHODS: A scoping review design has been used to identify studies focussing on the effectiveness of digital technologies in nursing care for persons in need of care, caregivers or care institutions. The screening process included 19,510 scientific publications from 9 databases. RESULTS: A total of 123 single studies and 31 reviews were subjected to the analysis. The included technologies comprise nursing and health information technologies, such as assistive devices, information and communication technologies, sensors and robotics. The results show that there are many studies that demonstrate positive effects, but the level of evidence is mostly low and study sizes are often small. Hardly any technology has been researched intensively enough to produce conclusive results. Studies on a high level of evidence (RCTs) lack for most technological areas. Heterogeneous results in some areas indicate that effects may depend strongly on the mode and specific context into which the technologies are introduced. CONCLUSION: Due to the limited evidence on effectiveness of digital technologies in nursing care, it is not surprising that care institutions are reluctant to put innovative technologies into practice. The scoping review indicates technology areas that should be subject to future research with higher quality studies. Research on outpatient, informal and cross-sectoral care should be intensified to further exploit the potential of digital technologies with a view to improving independence of care-recipients and unburdening formal and informal carers.

Application of digital technologies in nursing practice: Results of a mixed methods study on nurses' experiences, needs and perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Even though the importance of nurses' participation in the process of technology development is frequently stressed by stakeholders, participation has been described as negligible and limited by nurses' abilities to identify and communicate their needs and ideas for application scenarios or the improvement of digital nursing technologies (DNT) in everyday care practice. Prior research often uses hypothetical scenarios or laboratory settings with little real-world relevance, and the number of studies investigating needs for technology development, application scenarios or requested technologies from the perspective of nurses with experience in technology use is exceedingly small. Against this background, this study aims to investigate needs, application scenarios and perspectives of nurses with practical experience in real-world DNT application in a range of different care settings. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods design including an online survey (QUANT) and focus group (FG) discussions (qual) was used to explore nurses' perspectives and experiences. A convenience sample of participants was accessed via 19,000 e-mail contacts of directors of nursing (DONs) in care facilities and hospitals throughout Germany. Preliminary results of the online survey were discussed and elaborated in depth in three FGs. Quantitative results of the online survey were included in the development of the interview guideline for and data collection from the FGs. Descriptive, setting-specific analysis was conducted for quantitative data, and qualitative data was analysed by identifying key aspects. RESULTS: A total of 1,335 participants took part in the online survey, most of whom worked in ambulatory care institutions and held management positions such as DON or team leader. There were 14 FG participants. Ninety-five per cent of the participants of the online survey reported having experience in the use of DNT, predominantly with information and communication technologies (ICT). Overall, DNT were deemed to make work easier, and participants concurred on other positive effects such as increased efficiency or saved time and improved quality of care. Negative effects or concerns were reported less frequently. Reasons for non-adoption included technology-related (e.g. usability, functionality) and non-technology-related (e.g. competencies and context factors) issues, and facilitators for adoption were discussed in the FGs. Key aspects of application scenarios were enhanced technological support of direct nursing care tasks to reduce physical burden and mental stressors. Specifically, participants of the FGs expressed their wish for participative development and a general openness for nurses to be included in the development and testing of digital technologies. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Although efforts in development, research and theory-building have been increasing over recent years, DNT that go beyond more traditional or common applications within the ICT category (such as electronic nursing records or process planning) are rare. There are already technologies available for many of the expressed needs for which, however, adoption fails or does not happen. The reported barriers and facilitators indicate issues that should be taken into account when developing DNT for application in nursing practice. The study reveals a distinct need for information, counselling, facilitation and organizational development, and brings to light broad opportunities for the collaborative development of guided DNT implementation and evaluation processes. Future development and research activities should preferably be conducted by interdisciplinary research groups.

[Needs of long-term nursing in the COVID-19 pandemic]. / Bedarfe der Langzeitpflege in der COVID-19-Pandemie.

The SARS-CoV­2 virus and the associated disease COVID-19 pose major challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Especially the vulnerable group of people in need of long-term care is at risk of suffering a severe course of the disease or of dying from the infection.In a nationwide cross-sectional study the situation and needs of inpatient and outpatient long-term care facilities during the SARS-CoV­2 pandemic were assessed and analyzed using an online survey.Participants from 531 institutions postulated the need for uniform recommendations for action on SARS-CoV­2, adequate and affordable protective and hygiene materials, serial tests in the institutions, well-founded advice on the implementation of interventions, a specific pandemic plan and supporting public relations work by the media. This calls for higher nursing remuneration, better staffing levels and greater appreciation of the nursing profession.In order to protect the vulnerable group of people in need of nursing care from a SARS-CoV­2 infection, long-term care must be given a stronger focus in health policy measures during the pandemic.

Pflege in Zeiten von Corona: Zentrale Ergebnisse einer deutschlandweiten Querschnittsbefragung vollstationärer Pflegeheime.

Long-term care during the Corona pandemic - Main results from a nationwide online survey in nursing homes in Germany Abstract. Background: As a highly vulnerable group, people in need of long-term care are particularly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to their care-dependency, measures of social distancing can only be carried out to a very limited extent. In addition, the social and health consequences of reduced contacts are particularly high for nursing home residents. AIM: The study aims to describe the extent to which nursing homes are affected, the human and material resources of nursing homes, the organizational handling of the situation, and their requests for public support. METHODS: More than 7,000 nursing homes were invited to participate in an online survey with quantitative and qualitative elements. Data analysis applies descriptive statistics. RESULTS: 824 nursing homes participated in the survey. One in five nursing homes has at least one confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 among its residents and / or employees. The initial lack of protective equipment has now decreased, but the facilities still have to cope with additional corona-related care needs with reduced staff. Nursing homes have banned contacts between residents and relative to an extent that now has to be reduced again. Nursing homes demand the provision and external financing of protective equipment as well as the systematic and regular testing of nursing staff and the provision of uniform guidelines for action throughout Germany. CONCLUSIONS: As about half of all deceased people with COVID-19 have been living in nursing homes, the support of nursing homes in their attempt to restrict the pandemic requires highest attention.

Pflege in Zeiten von Corona: Ergebnisse einer deutschlandweiten Querschnittbefragung von ambulanten Pflegediensten und teilstationären Einrichtungen.

Care in times of Corona: Results of a cross-sectional study in German home care services Abstract. Background: People in need of care are particularly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic due to their age and previous illnesses. At the same time, a large number of daily contacts between nursing staff and those in need of care increase the risk of transmission of the disease. AIM: The study aims to illustrate (I) to what extent home care services and semi-residential care facilities are affected by COVID-19, (II) human and material resources, (III) the care situation of those in need of care and (IV) the organizational handling of the situation and outline support requests to politicians. METHODS: More than 12,000 home-care nursing services and semi-residential care facilities were invited to participate in an online survey with quantitative and qualitative elements, 701 nursing services (response rate 7,3 %) and 96 semi-residential facilities (response rate 3,5 %) took part. RESULTS: Almost a third (30,1 %, 189 / 627) of the nursing services surveyed are affected by confirmed or suspected cases of COVID-19 among clients. About half of the services report a reduced use of SGB V (47,6 %, 288 / 605) or SGB XI services (59,7 %, 375 / 628). Two thirds of the semi-residential facilities (65,6 %, 63 / 96) say they are currently closed due to the pandemic. Likewise, half of the nursing services (45,8 %, 253 / 552) reported that care with reduced use of services was at risk / unstable or even not ensured. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the situation of care-dependent people served by home-care services in the present pandemic - and also with a view to a possible second wave - should receive increased attention particularly with regard to unstable / risky care arrangements.

[Quality of ambulatory medical care in the context of age and care-dependency: Results of a cross-sectional analysis of German health claims data]. / Ambulante Versorgungsqualität im Kontext von Alter und Pflegebedürftigkeit ­ Ergebnisse einer Querschnittsanalyse von GKV-Routinedaten aus Deutschland.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Care-dependent community dwelling people are vulnerable to deficits in medical care provided by the German statutory health insurance (GKV). Quality of care indicators (QIs) contribute to the identification of deficits and of potential for the optimization of care. To investigate the discriminatory ability of QIs in a population of elderly people with and without care dependency and different age structures, insights into the feasibility of such QIs based on health claims data are of interest. The aim of this study is an explorative approach to health claims based QIs for the ambulatory medical care of care-dependent elderly which can be used to optimize health care processes. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used anonymised health claims data of a sample of statutory health insurance members from all German federal states of the year 2016. The sample consisted of 5,934,986 insured persons aged 65 years or older, who were community dwelling with (n = 785,135) or without care-dependency (n = 4,799,369) or who were residents of a nursing home (n = 350,482). 47 QIs focusing on ambulatory care-sensitive conditions such as, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus type 2 and depression were calculated on a quarterly basis and are reported descriptively as the arithmetic mean of four quarters stratified by place of residence and age group. RESULTS: The majority of QI values vary between the observed groups with an overarching trend to the disadvantage of older individuals. Even though care-dependent insured persons show higher prevalence rates of the underlying diagnoses of the QIs (except for asthma diagnoses), they score more detrimental QI values than those without care-dependency. This finding holds true after stratification by age group. DISCUSSION: This study describes differences in the quality of medical care for elderly people. Considering prior empirical evidence of deficits in medical care, factors that act as barriers or facilitators of guideline-oriented medical care need to be investigated. The contribution of patients' preferences, access to medical care or prioritisation by medical and nursing care providers when initiating diagnostic or therapeutic procedures remains unclear. Methodical limitations of this study notably derive from the selection process of the observed groups using two stratification variables. For the further development of QIs other influencing factors on both an individual and a population-related level as well as the providers' ability to influence these factors need to be taken into account and incorporated in a risk-adjusted description of QIs. CONCLUSION: Measurement of ambulatory medical care of an elderly population based on health claims data is feasible and shows differences in care processes of older and care-dependent individuals if place of residency and level of care-dependency are considered. Further development of the QIs explored should incorporate a thorough methodical foundation, particularly with regard to risk adjustment. In addition, the contribution of individual and contextual factors on QIs remains to be examined with a view to the community-dwelling care-dependent elderly and their ongoing residency in this setting.

[Influencing factors for nursing home admission in case of pre-existing need of care - a systematic review]. / Einflussfaktoren für einen Heimeintritt bei bestehender Pflegebedürftigkeit ­ eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit.

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge about predictors of nursing home placement is highly relevant. If they are known, targeted interventions such as counselling can help prevent or delay relocation to a nursing home. Above all, preventive and structural measures can target influenceable predictors. The aim of the review was to map predictors of nursing home admission and thus the permanent stay in inpatient long-term care for the target group of people with a pre-existing need for care. METHODS: A systematic literature search in the databases The Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, GeroLit and CareLit® was conducted in September 2017. Longitudinal studies with quantitative analyses were included. The methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: 45 cohort studies were included. 21 studies examined study populations with need for care, in 24 studies the care status was unclear. A variety of predictors of nursing home admission with at least one-and-a-half times higher risk for both study populations could be identified, including higher age, dementia, underweight, higher age of caregiver, psychiatric symptoms, smoking status, ethnicity, challenging behaviour in people with dementia, higher number of hospitalizations and lower level of life satisfaction. DISCUSSION: All the predictors identified are relevant to people in need of care. No predictors for the study population with need of care could be identified that are particularly important in contrast to persons with an unclear care status. However, the quality of studies among people with care and support needs is limited compared to studies targeting people with unclear care status. CONCLUSIONS: Many factors seem to predict the admission to a nursing facility. For the first time, these factors are listed in this systematic review for the target group of people in need of care. Interventions or preventive measures based on known influenceable predictors can help prevent or delay nursing home admission.

Measuring the effectiveness of digital nursing technologies: development of a comprehensive digital nursing technology outcome framework based on a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Digital nursing technologies (DNT) comprise an expanding, highly diverse field of research, explored using a wide variety of methods and tools. Study results are therefore difficult to compare, which raises the question how effectiveness of DNT can be adequately measured. Methods currently used might not be sufficient for certain specific nursing contexts. A comprehensive outcome framework that shows the multitude of possible outcome areas could be useful to generate more comparable results. The aim of the present study is to develop an outcome framework for DNT and to indicate which outcome areas have been most frequently evaluated in previous studies and how this has been done. METHODS: We combined an inductive and deductive approach to develop the framework. The numerical analysis is based on a scoping review focussing on the effectiveness of DNT for persons in need of care, formal or informal caregivers or care institutions. Nine databases were included in the screening: Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, the Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies, GeroLit and CareLit. Additional literature searches and expert interviews were included. RESULTS: The developed framework comprises four outcome target groups and 47 outcome areas. There are considerable differences in the researched outcome areas for the individual outcome target groups. Persons in need of care were by far the most frequently surveyed, particularly with respect to their psychological health. There are much fewer studies on formal and informal caregivers, and it is particularly noticeable that the quality of life of both groups has rarely been investigated. Care process quality was most frequently researched for organisations. CONCLUSION: We were able to provide a comprehensive DNT outcome framework, thereby identifying the outcome tools used and the less researched outcome areas. We recommend a detailed investigation of all areas and tools in future research projects with a view to initiating a discussion on the differing importance of existing outcome areas and on a standardisation of outcome tools. We also recommend the development of outcome areas for the macro level of effectiveness assessment.

[Health-related outcomes in shared-housing arrangements-results of a rapid review]. / Gesundheitsbezogene Versorgungsoutcomes in ambulant betreuten Wohngemeinschaften ­ Ergebnisse eines Rapid Reviews.

BACKGROUND: Shared-housing arrangements are relevant as a possible living arrangement alternative to living in a nursing home or residing in their own home for people in need of care. The aim was to record demonstrable differences in health-related outcomes between residents of shared-housing arrangements and residents of nursing homes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A rapid review was conducted to identify health-related outcomes in shared-housing arrangements. The literature search was carried out in September 2017 in the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Gerolit and LIVIVO. Comparative studies of German or English language were included when the nursing home was examined as a control group. RESULTS: The majority of the 21 studies included describes a favorable contribution of shared-housing arrangements compared to nursing homes. Quality of life is a frequently examined outcome that provides evidence of an advantage of shared-housing arrangements, especially for persons with dementia. CONCLUSION: A variety of health-related outcomes were examined. The results provide indications of favorable contributions of shared-housing arrangements. For the most part, there is still no conclusive evidence for outcomes based on studies of higher levels of evidence.