Treatment of sleep apnoea early after myocardial infarction with adaptive servo-ventilation - a proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep-disordered breathing has been associated with less myocardial salvage and smaller infarct size reduction after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The Treatment of sleep apnoea Early After Myocardial infarction with Adaptive Servo-Ventilation (TEAM-ASV I) trial investigated the effects of adding adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) to standard therapy on myocardial salvage index (MSI) and change in infarct size within 12 weeks after AMI. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, open-label trial, patients with AMI and successful percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 h after symptom onset plus SDB (apnoea-hypopnoea index ≥15/h) were randomised to standard medical therapy alone (control) or plus ASV (starting 3.6±1.4 days post-AMI). The primary outcome was MSI at 12 weeks post-AMI. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed at ≤5 days and 12 weeks after AMI. RESULTS: Seventy-six individuals were enrolled from February 2014 to August 2020; 39 had complete CMR data for analysis of the primary endpoint. MSI was significantly higher in the ASV versus control group (difference 14.6% of left ventricular mass [LVM]; 95% confidence interval 0.14-29.1; p=0.048). At 12 weeks, absolute [interquartile range] (6.6 [4.8-8.5] versus 2.8 [0.9-4.8] %LVM; p=0.003) and relative (44 [30-57] versus 21 [6-35] % of baseline; p=0.013) reductions in infarct size were greater in the ASV versus control group. No serious treatment-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment of SDB with ASV improved the MSI and decreased the infarct size at 12 weeks after AMI. Larger randomised trials are required to confirm these findings.

Initial therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban compared to prophylactic therapy with heparins in moderate to severe COVID-19: results of the COVID-PREVENT randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is associated with a prothrombotic state. Current guidelines recommend prophylactic anticoagulation upon hospitalization. METHODS: COVID-PREVENT, an open-label, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial enrolled patients (≥ 18 years) with moderate to severe COVID-19 and age-adjusted D-dimers > 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN). The participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily or thromboprophylaxis with a heparin (SOC) for at least 7 days followed by prophylactic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 28 days or no thromboprophylaxis. The primary efficacy outcome was the D-dimer level and the co-primary efficacy outcome the 7-category ordinal COVID-19 scale by WHO at 7 days post randomization. The secondary outcome was time to the composite event of either venous or arterial thromboembolism, new myocardial infarction, non-hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause death or progression to intubation and invasive ventilation up to 35 days post randomization. RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome D-dimer at 7 days was not different between patients assigned to therapeutic (n = 55) or prophylactic anticoagulation (n = 56) (1.21 mg/L [0.79, 1.86] vs 1.27 mg/L [0.79, 2.04], p = 0.78). In the whole study population D-dimer was significantly lower at 7 days compared to baseline (1.05 mg/L [0.75, 1.48] vs 1.57 mg/L [1.13, 2.19], p < 0.0001). Therapy with rivaroxaban compared to SOC was not associated an improvement on the WHO 7-category ordinal scale at 7 days (p = 0.085). Rivaroxaban improved the clinical outcome measured by the score in patients with a higher baseline D-dimer > 2.0 ULN (exploratory analysis; 0.632 [0.516, 0.748], p = 0.026). The secondary endpoint occurred in 6 patients (10.9%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 12 (21.4%) in the SOC group (time-to-first occurrence of the components of the secondary outcome: HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.15-1.67; p = 0.264). There was no difference in fatal or non-fatal major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban compared to prophylactic anticoagulation with a heparin did not improve surrogates of clinical outcome in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Whether initial rivaroxaban at therapeutic doses might be superior to thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19 and a high risk as defined by D-dimer > 2 ULN needs confirmation in further studies.

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.

Percutaneous transcatheter edge-to-edge reconstruction of the mitral valve is a safe and well-established therapy for severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation in patients with high surgical risk. Echocardiographic guidance in addition to fluoroscopy is the gold standard and should be performed using a standardized technique. This article lays out our reproducible step by step echocardiographic guide including views, measurements as well as highlighting possible difficulties that may arise during the procedure. This article provides detailed and chronological echocardiographic views for each step of the procedure, especially preferences between 2D and 3D imaging. If needed, pulse wave, continuous wave and color doppler measurements are described. Furthermore, as there are no official recommendations for the quantification of mitral regurgitation during the percutaneous edge-to-edge-repair procedure, advice is also included for echocardiographic quantification after grasping the mitral leaflets and after device deployment. In addition, the article deals with important echocardiographic views to prevent and deal with possible complications during the procedure. Echocardiographic guidance during transcatheter mitral valve repair is mandatory. A structured approach improves the collaboration between interventionist and imager and is indispensable for a safe and effective procedure.

Rationale and design of the randomised Treatment of sleep apnoea Early After Myocardial infarction with Adaptive Servo-Ventilation trial (TEAM-ASV I).

AIMS: In acute myocardial infarction (AMI), impaired myocardial salvage and large infarct size result in residual heart failure, which is one of the most important predictors of morbidity and mortality after AMI. Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is associated with reduced myocardial salvage index (MSI) within the first 3 months after AMI. Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) can effectively treat both types of SDB (central and obstructive sleep apnoea). The Treatment of sleep apnoea Early After Myocardial infarction with Adaptive Servo-Ventilation trial (TEAM-ASV I) will investigate the effects of ASV therapy, added to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and optimal medical management of AMI, on myocardial salvage after AMI. METHODS/DESIGN: TEAM ASV-I is a multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial with blinded assessment of PCI outcomes. Patients with first AMI and successful PCI within 24 h after symptom onset and SDB (apnoea-hypopnoea index ≥ 15/h) will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to PCI and optimal medical therapy alone (control) or plus ASV (with stratification of randomisation by infarct location; left anterior descending (LAD) or no LAD lesion). The primary outcome is the MSI, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Key secondary outcomes are change of infarct size, left ventricular ejection fraction and B-type natriuretic peptide levels and disease-specific symptom burden at 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: TEAM ASV-I will help to determine whether treatment of SDB with ASV in the acute phase after myocardial infarction contributes to more myocardial salvage and healing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02093377. Registered on March 21, 2014.

Repetitive use of levosimendan in advanced heart failure: need for stronger evidence in a field in dire need of a useful therapy.

Patients in the latest stages of heart failure are severely compromised, with poor quality of life and frequent hospitalizations. Heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device implantation are viable options only for a minority, and intermittent or continuous infusions of positive inotropes may be needed as a bridge therapy or as a symptomatic approach. In these settings, levosimendan has potential advantages over conventional inotropes (catecholamines and phosphodiesterase inhibitors), such as sustained effects after initial infusion, synergy with beta-blockers, and no increase in oxygen consumption. Levosimendan has been suggested as a treatment that reduces re-hospitalization and improves quality of life. However, previous clinical studies of intermittent infusions of levosimendan were not powered to show statistical significance on key outcome parameters. A panel of 45 expert clinicians from 12 European countries met in Rome on November 24-25, 2016 to review the literature and envision an appropriately designed clinical trial addressing these needs. In the earlier FIGHT trial (daily subcutaneous injection of liraglutide in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction) a composite Global Rank Score was used as primary end-point where death, re-hospitalization, and change in N-terminal-prohormone-brain natriuretic peptide level were considered in a hierarchical order. In the present study, we tested the same end-point post hoc in the PERSIST and LEVOREP trials on oral and repeated i.v. levosimendan, respectively, and demonstrated superiority of levosimendan treatment vs placebo. The use of the same composite end-point in a properly powered study on repetitive levosimendan in advanced heart failure is strongly advocated.

Preliminary Results From the C-Pulse OPTIONS HF European Multicenter Post-Market Study.

BACKGROUND The C-Pulse System is an extra-aortic balloon counterpulsation device. It is used to treat patients with heart failure disease in NYHA functional class III or ambulatory class IV. MATERIAL AND METHODS We present preliminary site-reported 6-month data from 3 centers in Germany as part of the prospective observational post-market OPTIONS HF study. RESULTS Between May 2013 and March 2014, the C-Pulse System was implanted in 8 patients (7 male) with a mean age of 61.6±9.3 years. Four had ischemic and 4 had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. No stroke, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, or major infection due to the device were reported. One patient developed non-device-related refractory tachycardia with worsening heart failure 12 h after surgery and underwent left ventricular assist device implantation. Within 6 months of observation, functional status improved from NYHA III to II in 5 patients, and 2 remained in NYHA III. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 24.3±7.9% to 44.5±4.5% (p<0.0001). Mean Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall score improved from 28.6±19.1 to 59.1±22.5 (p=0.0183). Six-minute walk test was performed in 6 out of 7 patients at follow-up. The mean distance improved from 252.0±85.1 m to 279.2±87.5 m (p>0.05). One patient was weaned off the device after 6 months of support. CONCLUSIONS The C-Pulse System provides a therapeutic option for patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure and seems to improve quality of life and cardiac function over time.