Symmetry and range limits in importance indices.

Recently, Mingo has analyzed the properties of I imp, an importance index, and demonstrated that its range is not symmetrical. While agreeing with this comment, we believe that more light needs to be shed on the issue of symmetry in relation to such indices. Importance indices are calculated using three values: performance of the organism in the absence and in the presence of neighbors and maximum performance of the organism in ideal conditions. Because of this structure, importance indices can hardly ever achieve symmetry along the whole range of potential performances. We discuss the limitation of the symmetry range for different symmetry types and for both additive and multiplicative indices. We conclude that importance indices, as other interactions indices, are practical tools for interpreting ecological outcomes, especially while comparing between studies. Nevertheless, the current structure of importance indices prevents symmetry along their whole range. While the lack of "perfect" symmetry may call for the development of more sophisticated importance metrics, the current indices are still helpful for the understanding of biological systems and should not be discarded before better alternatives are well established. To prevent potential confusion, we suggest that ecologists present the relevant index symmetry range in addition to their results, thus minimizing the probability of misinterpretation.

Beyond the competition-colonization trade-off: linking multiple trait response to disturbance characteristics.

Disturbances' role in shaping communities is well documented but highly disputed. We suggest replacing the overused two-trait trade-off approach with a functional group scheme, constructed from combinations of four key traits that represent four classes of species' responses to disturbances. Using model results and field observations from sites affected by two highly different disturbances, we demonstrated that popular dichotomous trade-offs are not sufficient to explain community dynamics, even if some emerge under certain conditions. Without disturbances, competition was only sufficient to predict species survival but not relative success, which required some escape mechanism (e.g., long-term dormancy). With highly predictable and large-scale disturbances, successful species showed a combination of high individual tolerance to disturbance and, more surprisingly, high competitive ability. When disturbances were less predictable, high individual tolerance and long-term seed dormancy were favored, due to higher environmental uncertainty. Our study demonstrates that theories relying on a small number of predefined trade-offs among traits (e.g., competition-colonization trade-off) may lead to unrealistic results. We suggest that the understanding of disturbance-community relationships can be significantly improved by employing sets of relevant trait assemblies instead of the currently common approach in which trade-offs are assumed in advance.

Eye size in geckos: Asymmetry, allometry, sexual dimorphism, and behavioral correlates.

The function of the vertebrate eye depends on its absolute size, and the size is presumably adapted to specific needs. We studied the variation of eye size at all levels, from intra-individual to inter-specific, in lid- less, spectacled, gecko lizards (Gekkonomorpha). We mea sured 1,408 museum specimens of 62 species, representing subfamilies Diplodactylinae, Gekkoninae, and Sphaerodactylinae. Intra-individually, eye size showed significant directional asymmetry in Stenodactylus sthenodactylus. A latitudinal study of six species confirmed that during postnatal ontogeny eye size undergoes conventional negative allometry; the slope is steeper among adults than among juveniles, expressing the need of juveniles for relatively larger eyes. Within species with sexual size dimorphism, commonly the larger sex possessed larger eyes in absolute terms but not relative to head-and-body length. Interspecifically, eye size showed negative allometry, with slope significantly steeper than those of intraspecific ontogenetic allometry, again expressing the need of juveniles for relatively larger eyes and showing that eye-size differences among species do not merely result from body-size differences. Finally, adult eye size varied interspecifically in correlation with parameters of behavioral ecology: eyes were significantly larger in nocturnal than in diurnal species, and significantly larger in cursorial than in scansorial species.