ABSTRACT
Purpose: The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies into the medical field has brought about remarkable advancements, particularly in the domain of clinical decision support systems. However, it is uncertain how they will perform as clinical decision-makers. Methods: This prospective cohort study evaluates the potential of incorporating ChatGPT-4 plus into the management of subcapital fifth metacarpal fractures. The treatment recommendations provided by ChatGPT-4 plus were compared with those of the two control groups-the attending clinic plastic surgeon and an independent expert panel. The primary outcome measures, operative or conservative, were compared between the groups. Intraclass correlation of 0.61 infers moderate reliability in the consistency of recommended management plans across all groups. Results: Key predictors for opting for operative management, regardless of the decision-maker, included clinical signs of scissoring, extension deficit, and radiographic evidence of intra-articular extension. Conclusions: These findings support the potential for artificial intelligence applications in enhancing diagnostic and treatment decisions. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 has had a significant impact on healthcare resources and the medical workforce. Clinically-based medical education is the principal source of learning, and this has been profoundly impacted by restrictions due to COVID-19. It follows that junior medical staff and their education would be significantly impacted due to the altered volume and breadth of their clinical exposure. Some literature has been published regarding the impact to medical training during COVID-19. This study sought to review junior medical staff perceptions and their reported impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their education and training.Nine databases (three Ovid MEDLINE databases, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Educational Resources Information Centre and PsychINFO) were searched for studies published in 1 January 2020 through 24 August 2020. Via a scoping review protocol, an iterative process was used to perform the identification, review and charting analysis of the reported outcomes and themes. Descriptive analysis was performed using quantitative and qualitative methods.Of the 25 343 sources identified, 32 were included in the review. There were studies published from nearly all continents, predominantly in surgical journals, with a wide spread of specialties. Themes identified included the current impact of the pandemic in relation to continuation of and modifications to training programmes, as well as the future impact due to training requirements and career progression.Junior medical staff report that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on their education and training. Whether the changes imposed by the pandemic on education are temporary measures or permanent fixtures, and whether standards of competence may be impacted, is not yet known. This scoping review forms a basis for further investigation in the field.