ABSTRACT
Dermatologists routinely see patients with inflammatory skin conditions and aesthetic concerns that involve substantial psychological comorbidity. However, most dermatologists do not receive formal training in this area, and many are unsure how to best help treat certain patients holistically. Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a common and distressing psychiatric condition that disproportionately impacts dermatology patients, including patients living with chronic inflammatory skin conditions such as acne and atopic dermatitis. BDD is characterized by preoccupation with nonexistent or minimally noticeable flaws in physical appearance that cause clinically significant distress or impairment in functioning. Adolescent populations may be particularly vulnerable to clinically significant body image dissatisfaction, including BDD, due to the high prevalence of acne and the pervasive role of social media platforms. The rise of social media may exacerbate body image issues through repetitive exposure to idealized and often unrealistic beauty standards. Though screening questionnaires can assist dermatologists in recognizing BDD, dermatologists must collaborate with mental health providers to provide comprehensive care to vulnerable patients, including adolescents.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(7):545-550. doi:10.36849/JDD.8156.
Subject(s)
Body Dysmorphic Disorders , Humans , Body Dysmorphic Disorders/psychology , Body Dysmorphic Disorders/diagnosis , Body Dysmorphic Disorders/therapy , Body Dysmorphic Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Body Image/psychology , Acne Vulgaris/psychology , Acne Vulgaris/diagnosis , Acne Vulgaris/therapy , Body Dissatisfaction/psychology , Dermatology/methods , Social Media , Dermatitis, Atopic/psychology , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Dermatologists/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA), a chronic autoimmune disorder causing non-scarring hair loss, has a greater prevalence in the pediatric population. Like many visible dermatologic disorders, AA can cause significant psychosocial impairment, particularly in children who are undergoing critical periods of psychosocial development. This paper investigates the psychosocial impact of AA on children. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. SCOPUS and PubMed databases were utilized with the terms "alopecia areata," "pediatric," and "psychosocial comorbidities." 12 articles were reviewed, with 6 meeting inclusion criteria for detailed analysis. RESULTS: The review revealed prominent associations between AA and psychosocial comorbidities in children. Psychiatric conditions including anxiety, depression, and OCD, were prevalent in pediatric AA patients, with exacerbation due to increased disease severity. These negatively impacted the Quality of Life (QoL) in affected children. Additionally, the comorbidities extended beyond psychiatric diagnoses, impacting self-esteem, academic performance, peer relationships, and body image satisfaction in children. CONCLUSION: This literature review highlights the significant impact of various psychosocial comorbidities in children with AA, emphasizing the need for early identification and intervention. Healthcare professionals, including psychiatrists, therapists, and dermatologists, can play a significant role in treating pediatric patients with AA. Dermatologists can play a critical role in diagnosing AA and identifying psychosocial comorbidities that may arise and refer patients to appropriate care. Future research should focus on elucidating effective screening tools for dermatologists to identify these comorbidities early, ultimately improving the overall well-being of children with AA.
ABSTRACT
Inadequate education regarding disease manifestations in diverse skin colors hinders diagnosis and exacerbates health disparities. All levels of medical trainees report low confidence in accurately identifying disease in skin of color (SOC). To help further elucidate these concerns, our research aims to assess medical student confidence in recognizing cutaneous diseases in SOC and their viewpoints regarding SOC education within their institution. An eight-question, open-ended survey was provided to medical students before and after a SOC presentation. The survey assessed participants' confidence in their diagnostic ability and perspectives on educational material. Among the 70 attendees, 58 (82.8%) and 64 (91.4%) completed the pre- and post-seminar surveys, respectively. There was a significant discrepancy in confidence levels when assessing cutaneous manifestations of internal pathology in light (Monk Skin Colors 1-5) versus dark (Monk Skin Colors 6-10) skin (p < 0.009). Notably, 78.7% (37/47) perceived the institutional learning materials as insufficient for SOC. Post-seminar reflections indicated that 87.2% (40/46) of students lacked confidence in diagnosing SOC, with 78.7% (32/46) citing inadequate curriculum coverage as the cause. An additional 8.5% (6/46) identified the predominance of white-centric medical descriptions as a hindrance. Students collectively called for improved educational approaches, including better visual representation of diseases in darker skin. Medical education must continue to strive for increased SOC representation to train competent physicians in treating a diverse patient population and reduce disparities in SOC patients.
