Liver retransplantation in children: the Atlanta experience.

Liver retransplantation is routinely offered at our institution. Previous reports document that patient and graft survival is significantly less after pediatric rLT compared to primary LT. This has engendered intense debate regarding optimal allocation of organs. Here, we examine our program's approach to pediatric hepatic retransplantation related to patient factors affecting outcomes. Between 1997 and 2009, 272 LTs were performed in 234 patients (mean survival 1994 +/- 1367 days) at our center. Thirty-four patients required rLT including 10 who received their primary transplant elsewhere and four who required two retransplantations. Patient survival did not differ significantly between rLT and LT at one and three yr (p = 0.56). Graft survival between rLT and LT was also similar (p = 0.606) at one and three yr. No significant difference in graft or patient survival was noted between: Patients retransplanted <30 days after LT vs. those >30 days (p = 0.152); patients transplanted with technical variants vs. whole grafts (p = 0.966); technical variants utilized for LT vs. rLT (p = 0.713); rLT recipient age (< or >5 yr; p = 0.298); or ABOI for rLT and LT (p = 0.650). Retransplantation should be offered to optimize pediatric recipient survival after LT and offers similar survival as primary transplant.

Incidence, impact, and treatment of portal and hepatic venous complications following pediatric liver transplantation: a single-center 12 year experience.

PVT or PVS and HVOO are known causes of graft and patient loss after pediatric liver transplantation. Increased incidences of these complications have been reported in partial livers including DDSLT or LDLT. From 1997 to 2008, 241 consecutive pediatric patients received 271 hepatic grafts at a single center. Median follow-up is 1856 days. Surgical technique, demographics, lab values, and radiologic imaging procedures were obtained utilizing OTTR to evaluate the relationship of portal and hepatic complications with risk factors, patient and graft survival. Grafts were composed of 115/271 (42.4%) partial livers of which 90 (33.2%) were DDSLT and 25 (9.2%) LDLT. Of 271 patients, 156 (57.6%) received whole-sized grafts. There were six PVC in five patients with one patient requiring retransplantation (0.34%) and no patient deaths. Utilizing all three hepatic vein orifices on the recipient hepatic vena cava and the donor hepatic vein cut short enables a wide hepatic outflow tract unlikely to twist. None of the 241 patients developed early or late complications of the hepatic vein. None of the last 128 consecutive patients who received 144 grafts over seven and a half yr have developed either early or late complications of the hepatic or portal vein. Partial-graft actuarial survival was similar to whole-graft survival (87.2% vs. 85.3% at one yr; 76.6% vs. 80.2 at three yr; p = 0.488). Likewise, patient survival was similar between partial grafts and whole grafts (93.8% vs. 93.1% at one yr; 89.8% vs. 87.2% at three yr; p = 0.688) with median follow-up of 1822 (+/-1334) days. Patients receiving partial livers were significantly younger and smaller than patients receiving whole livers (p < 0.001). Portal and hepatic venous complications may have negative effects on patient or graft survival after pediatric liver transplantation. In our series, there was one graft and no patient loss related to portal or hepatic venous complications after pediatric liver transplantation over 12 yr.

Pediatric liver transplantation for acute liver failure at a single center: a 10-yr experience.

Children transplanted for ALF urgently require an optimal graft and have lower post-transplant survival compared with children transplanted for chronic liver disease. Over 10 yr, 33 consecutive children transplanted for ALF were followed. Demographics, encephalopathy, intubation, dialysis, laboratory values, graft type ABOI, XL (GRWR > 5%), DDSLT, LDLT and WLT were evaluated. Complications and survival were determined. ALF accounted for 33/201 (16.4%) of transplants during this period. Twelve of 33 received ABOI, five XL grafts, 18 DDSLT, and three LDLT. Waiting time pretransplant was 2.1 days. One- and three-yr patient survival in the ALF group was 93.4% and 88.9%, and graft survivals were 86.4% and 77.7%. Median follow-up was 1452 days. ABOI one- and three yr patient and graft survival in the ALF was 91.6% and 78.6%. No difference in graft or patient survival was noted in the ALF and chronic liver disease group or the ABOI and the ABO compatible group. A combination of ABO incompatible donor livers, XL grafts, DDSLT, LDLT and WLT led to a short wait time and subsequent graft and patient survival comparable to patients with non-acute disease.