ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In the treatment of patients with cranial base tumors, unclippable aneurysms, or medically intractable ischemia, it may be necessary to use high-flow bypass grafts. The indications, surgical techniques and complications are discussed. METHODS: During a 10-year period, 99 saphenous vein grafts and 3 radial artery grafts were performed for 101 patients, i.e., 72 with neoplasms, 23 with aneurysms, and 6 with ischemia. Clinical follow-up monitoring of the patients was by direct examination or telephone interview, with a mean follow-up period of 41.2 months (range, 5-147 mo). Radiological follow-up monitoring was by magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance angiography, or three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography, with a mean follow-up period of 32 months (range, 1-120 mo). During the follow-up period, there was one late graft occlusion and one graft stenosis. RESULTS: The use of intraoperative angiography improved the patency rate from 90 to 98% and reduced the incidence of perioperative stroke from 13 to 9.5%. Ninety-two percent of the patients were in excellent or good neurological condition at the time of discharge from the hospital, compared with 95% before surgery. The perioperative mortality rate was 2%. Other complications included three intracranial hematomas, rupture of a vein graft in a patient with Marfan's syndrome, and five tumor resection-related problems. The long-term survival rates for patients who received grafts were excellent for patients with benign tumors, fair to poor for patients with malignant tumors, good for patients with aneurysms, and excellent for patients with ischemia. CONCLUSION: The results of saphenous vein and radial artery grafting have been greatly improved by the use of intraoperative angiography, improvements in surgical techniques, and improved perioperative treatment.
ABSTRACT
Meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus present the neurosurgeon with different choices: observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery. During the last decade, advances in microsurgical techniques have significantly lowered the treatment-related morbidity, and some neurosurgeons have reported long-term follow-up results. Recently, several radiosurgical series have reported excellent tumor control and good functional preservation for tumors in this area. Most of these series do not provide complete information about the patient's cranial nerve function, and objective and subjective outcome data. The follow-up provided has also been short, considering that meningiomas have a tendency to recur or regrow up to 20 years postoperatively. There is also the concern about those patients who fail radiosurgical treatment, since microsurgery does not yield good results in such cases. In this paper, several radiosurgical series are critically reviewed, with a discussion about the pros and cons of microsurgery versus radiosurgery. The authors suggest that a uniform reporting strategy be adopted by all surgeons treating tumors of this area, which will allow comparative studies to be conducted. Additionally, we suggest a treatment algorithm for cavernous sinus meningiomas, based on the patients age, occupation and preference, preoperative binocular function, and curability of the tumor.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Due to their involvement with critical neurovascular structures, tumors located in the cranial base present challenges to neurosurgeons and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Rates of tumor control, complications, patient outcomes, and recurrences were extracted and summarized from two decades of our surgical and radiological treatment follow-up and review of the medical literature. RESULTS: Recent advances in surgical techniques involving cranial base approaches have made surgical intervention safer and curative resection more likely. In managing benign tumors, surgical resection is the gold standard for treatment. While immediate complications are still significant, long-term outcomes in most cases are excellent. Focused radiosurgery using a gamma knife or linear accelerator has produced favorable outcomes, and it improves the management of small or minimally symptomatic cranial base tumors. For slow-growing malignant tumors, extensive surgery followed by radiotherapy achieves the best outcome. In managing highly malignant tumors, outcome is determined by the effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. On some occasions, surgery is needed to obtain greater control of highly malignant tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Skull base tumors are relatively common, and management of these tumors is rapidly evolving. The combination of surgical excision using cranial base techniques, radiosurgery, fractionated radiotherapy, and chemotherapy should be individually tailored based on the location and pathological aggressiveness of the tumor and the symptomatology of the patient.
