The relationship of gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma control.

Purpose: To study whether ACT responses are confounded by gastro-esophageal status (GERD), and if this is in concordance with the variation in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1%) and Fractional Excretion of Nitric Oxide (FeNO). Materials and Methods: This is a prospective cohort study (n = 307). Patients were surveyed for demographics data, and underwent ACT scoring, FEV1% and FeNO testing. Results: Patients with GERD had mean ACT scores that were 4.1 (p < .001) lower than without-GERD group. Not-well-controlled asthmatics (FEV1% <80, high FeNO) with-GERD had mean ACT scores that were 2.9 (p < .001) for FEV1% <80 and 3.8 (p = .008) for high FeNO lower than without-GERD group respectively. Well-controlled asthmatics (FEV1% ≥80, low FeNO) with-GERD had mean ACT scores that were 5.2 (p < .001) for FEV1% ≥80 and 5.1 (p < .001) for low FeNO lower than without-GERD group respectively. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that symptoms of GERD can lead to an inaccurate perception of asthma control and ACT as compared to objective measures, such as FEV1% and FeNO. Hence, this can lead to mismanagement of asthma, especially when objective measures are not conducted along with ACT.

The effect of the socioeconomic status on the measurement of asthma control.

Background: The Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a commonly used scoring system for evaluation of asthma control in the pediatric and adult populations. Asthma control has been deemed poor in those economically disadvantaged. Objective: To study whether the ACT is affected by socioeconomic status (SES) as evaluated by the percentage of the federal poverty level and the education level. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study (N = 307), in which the patients were surveyed for demographics data and underwent ACT scoring, spirometry (forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration) and fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide testing. Results: There was a positive correlation of improved mean score on the ACT (p < 0.001) with higher education status and higher federal poverty level status. Conclusion: SES plays a factor in the way patients perceived their asthma control, and therefore affected how they scored on the ACT.

Prevalence and management of aspirin hypersensitivity in a cardiology practice.

Background: Data are lacking with concern to the prevalence and management of aspirin (ASA) hypersensitivity. Objective: To study the prevalence, different types of reactions, and implications for clinical management of ASA hypersensitivity in a cardiology practice. Methods: We conducted an electronic medical record review of 11,375 individuals, 5052 (44%) in the ambulatory setting, and 6323 (56%) admitted for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), from January 2012 to December 2013. Results: The prevalence of ASA hypersensitivity was 1.88% (n = 214). Skin reactions were the most common (40 [19%]), followed by angioedema (10 [4.6%]), respiratory (9 [4.2%]), and anaphylaxis (6 [2.8%]). No records were found for 74 patients (34.5%), and 69 patients (32.2%) were mistakenly labeled as allergic for having gastrointestinal symptoms. Of the 214 patients who had documented ASA hypersensitivity, 108 individuals (50.46%) had coronary artery disease. The medications at discharge were the following: ASA (30 [14%]), thienopyridine (48 [22%]), a combination of ASA and thienopyridine (13 [6%]), anticoagulation only (26 [12%]), and no antiplatelet (97 [43%]). Conclusion: ASA hypersensitivity is often not documented correctly or is often misdiagnosed or not appropriately managed. There is a need for improved management of ASA hypersensitivity, including appropriate referral for ASA desensitization and combating unnecessary avoidance in patients with intolerance due to adverse effects.

Antibiotic hypersensitivity and adverse reactions: management and implications in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown the discrepancy between self-reported antibiotic allergies and true allergies. Inaccurate reporting of antibiotic hypersensitivities can limit treatment options and result in use of more expensive antibiotics and contribute to resistance. METHODS: This retrospective cohort chart review obtained data on 16,515 patients after obtaining IRB approval. Patients who had an antibiotic adverse reaction were identified, recorded, and their management reviewed. 7926 patients were selected from inpatient internal medicine clinics, 8042 patients from outpatient internal medicine clinics, and 547 from orthopedic clinics. RESULTS: The prevalence of reported antibiotic sensitivity in our study was 9.89% (n = 1624). Reported antibiotic sensitivity was 8.88% (n = 704) in inpatient settings as compared to 11.2% (n = 902) and 5.12% (n = 28) in medicine and orthopedic outpatient settings respectively. The top five antibiotic adverse reactions reported were penicillins (42%), sulfonamides (25%), fluoroquinolones (4.3%), tetracyclines (4.2%), and macrolides (3.5%). In all settings, penicillins and sulfonamides adverse reactions were the top two reportings. 11.88% (n = 193) of patients with reported adverse reactions reported sensitivities to multiple antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated high prevalence of reported antibiotic sensitivity in three clinical settings. However, a significant portion of these patients may not be truly hypersensitive to these antibiotics. There is a need for increased awareness among medical professionals about the importance of detailed history taking and management of self-reported antibiotic allergies to combat unnecessary use of antibiotics.

Prolonged severe immunodeficiency following thymectomy and radiation: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Immunodeficiency can occur both in patients undergoing radiation therapy, as well as in patients who have had thymectomies. However, few studies have examined the immune recovery of a patient following both procedures. We aim to emphasize the need for assessment and consistent monitoring of patients with thymoma prior to and after combined treatment of thymectomy and radiation, both of which are likely to result in an increased risk for immunodeficiency. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the longitudinal progress of a 59-year-old Asian male who underwent thymectomy followed by radiation therapy and subsequently presented with generalized urticaria. Revelation of a low absolute lymphocyte count (615 cells/mcL) on initial evaluation prompted further analysis of his immunoglobulin levels and antigen response to a polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PneumoVax-23). Although his immunoglobulin levels were unremarkable, he failed to respond to 11 of 12 serotypes of the pneumococcal vaccine. As a result, he was placed on Bactrim® (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) prophylaxis to prevent opportunistic infections, and his CD4+ and CD8+ counts were monitored over the course of 8 years. His lymphocyte counts 87 months after thymectomy and 85 months after radiation therapy were as follows: absolute lymphocyte count 956 cells/mcL, absolute CD3+/CD4+ 164/mm3 (16%) and absolute CD3+/CD8+ 257/mm3 (25%). The patient was able to discontinue Bactrim® (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) prophylaxis after 9 years of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The lymphocytopenia, low CD4+ count, and failed response to pneumococcal vaccination that presented in our patient are consistent with immunodeficiency. After radiation alone, a recovery of T-lymphocytes is usually observed after approximately 3 weeks. Over the course of 8 years, he has still not made a full recovery according to laboratory markers, which seem to have stabilized at chronically low levels. To prevent serious complications, we suggest that patients who have undergone both thymectomy and radiation therapy be monitored for immunodeficiency. This case report informs the practices of allergists, oncologists, and neurologists in the continuing care of patients with thymoma.

Efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in combination with a long-acting beta2-agonist in asthmatic children under age 5.

The incidence of asthma in children under age 5 is higher than in any other segment of the population. Current NAEPP guidelines recommend treatment of some asthmatics in this age group with the combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta2-agonist even though this practice has never been studied with children younger than 4. This retrospective study analyzes the efficacy and safety of a combination of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol (SA) in children under 5. Fifty patients who started using FP/SA before the age of 60 months were included in the analysis. To determine efficacy, we tracked the change in emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and the frequency of wheezing as a result of treatment. Emergency room visits were reduced from 78 to 5 (p<0.001), hospitalizations were reduced from 43 to 2 (p<0.001) and frequency of wheezing, daily, weekly, or monthly, was also reduced significantly (p<0.003). In terms of safety, there was only a 3.4% reduction in height percentile (p=0.37). Combination therapy is highly efficacious and safe for asthmatics under the age of 5. A well-designed prospective study is necessary to further evaluate the benefits and risks of this treatment method.