Comparison of three instruments to assess changes of motor impairment in acute hemispheric stroke: the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS).

PURPOSE: The purpose was to compare the performance of three representative instruments to measure changes of motor recovery with acute hemispheric stroke. METHOD: In 41 consecutive patients with acute hemispheric infarction, motor recovery was assessed within 3 days of onset and then every 2 weeks until the 12th week with the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS). We analyzed the relationships among the corresponding subscales of the three instruments with the Spearman's rank correlation method, and compared their responsiveness by plotting the temporal profiles of scores of each instrument and by testing the significance of changes over time with the Friedman test. RESULTS: High correlations were observed among the three instruments at each examination point. However, the SIAS scores were more widely dispersed at the same NIHSS and CNS scores. Friedman test revealed that the scores changed significantly during the observation period with the SIAS and the CNS but not with the NIHSS. The changes were detected later with the CNS than with the SIAS. CONCLUSIONS: Although the assessment results with the three instruments were highly inter-correlated, the SIAS performed better with respect to responsiveness to changes. Implication for Rehabilitation When providing rehabilitation services to patients with stroke, it is important to document objectively the level of their impairment from the acute stage and during the entire course of rehabilitation with standardized instrument, and to predict their functional outcomes as early and accurately as possible. This study therefore compared three representative instruments with established psychometric properties, the SIAS, the NIHSS and the CNS, with respect to their ability to document motor impairment and their responsiveness to recovery in patients with acute hemispheric stroke.

[Examination of living environment upon return to home for patients with cervical spinal cord injury--report of a case].

Living environment is a problem for spinal cord injury patients upon their return to the society. There are also many instances of home care problems after hospital discharge. For cervical spinal cord injury patients in particular, appropriate intervention/assistance provided by the authorities in accordance with the level of residual function is essential, but there have been few reports on this issue. Here we report on a municipal facility for cervical spinal cord injury patients where a patient moved into upon hospital discharge that did not provide a suitable environment, and the burden posed on his family increased. The patient was a 55-year-old man with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury who was commuting to our rehabilitation center after hospital discharge. We investigated the environment in the municipal housing facility he had moved into, and examined the relationship between the level of cervical spinal cord injury function and ADL assessment before and after hospital discharge. The main problems were an increase in care provided by his wife due to unsuitable toilet facilities and insufficient public facilities concerning the living environment. In terms of ADL by FIM (functional independence measure), namely, toilet transfer, toilet motion and defecation control which he had performed independently at the time of hospital discharge, all had decreased to a level requiring assistance after he moved into the present apartment. Therefore, approach via welfare equipment compensation were undertaken. As a result, the burden for his wife diminished, but the ADL and FIM scores obtained were low. Thus, the living environment facilities for patients with cervical spinal cord injuries should be in accordance with the level of function and ADL, suggesting the necessity for the authorities to establish a cooperative system for running home facilities.

[The necessity of community rehabilitation for outpatients with a communication disorder].

In order to explore the necessity of community rehabilitation, we conducted a questionnaire survey of patients with a communication disorder who had finished speech therapy at our hospital during the period of April 1998 to November 2001. A total of fifty-four subjects answered the questionnaire. The following observations were made based on the results. 1. Fifty-nine percent of the respondents was experiencing some degree of difficulties in their daily life, and facing some sorts of psychological and social problems. 2. Fifty nine percent considered community rehabilitation was necessary, while only one respondent was actually receiving it. 3. The majority of respondents wished there were speech therapists in their area to provide a variety of services such as recreation and rehabilitation. These results suggest the importance of speech therapy through local welfare and social care facilities.