ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the degree of pain, the amount of retained gas, and the safety of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) insufflation in patients undergoing double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE). OBJECTIVE: To clarify the usefulness and safety of CO(2) insufflation during DBE. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Forty eligible patients with small-bowel disease for whom DBE was indicated were randomized to a CO(2) insufflation (CO(2)) group or an air insufflation (air) group by means of sealed envelopes. INTERVENTION: DBE with insufflation of CO(2) or air. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy evaluation was based on the degree of pain as assessed by use of a visual analog scale (VAS) and the amount of residual gas retention within the small and large bowels on radiography. The safety of CO(2) insufflation was evaluated by arterial blood gas analysis. RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients in the CO(2) group had severe pain of ≥ 50 mm on the VAS during DBE than in the air group (P = .02). Significantly less gas was retained in the small bowel just after and at 3 hours after DBE in the CO(2) group than in the air group (P = .003, P = .01, respectively). There was significantly less residual gas retention in the large bowel at 3 hours after DBE in the CO(2) group than in the air group (P = .02). There was no significant difference in pre-DBE and post-DBE partial pressure of oxygen in the blood (PaO(2)) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the blood (PaCO(2)) between groups. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSION: CO(2) insufflation is a safe and useful procedure when performed during DBE.
Subject(s)
Air , Carbon Dioxide/administration & dosage , Double-Balloon Enteroscopy/methods , Insufflation/methods , Intestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Intestine, Small , Adult , Blood Gas Analysis , Carbon Dioxide/pharmacokinetics , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Intestinal Diseases/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen/blood , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) is a therapeutic option for intestinal strictures of Crohn's disease (CD). Double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) enables EBD to be performed even for deep-situated strictures of the small intestine. The aim of this study was to clarify the efficacy and safety of EBD using DBE for small bowel strictures in patients with CD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The subjects comprised 25 patients with CD who underwent EBD using DBE for small intestinal strictures for which a colonoscope or gastrointestinal scope could not be inserted. All subjects had obstructive symptoms due to strictures that were confirmed using small intestinal enteroclysis. They were observed for at least 6 months after the initial EBD. The short-term success rate of EBD using DBE, the complication rate and the long-term outcome were investigated. RESULTS: This procedure was successful with regard to short-term dilatation in 18 of the 25 CD patients (72%). Long strictures measuring more than 3 cm were seen in six out of seven (85.7%) of the unsuccessful EBD cases, compared with two out of 18 (11.1%) of the successful EBD cases (P=0.001). Complications were encountered in two of the 25 patients (8%). The cumulative surgery-free rate for all the subjects was 83% and 72% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: EBD using DBE is a useful and safe procedure for small intestinal short strictures in CD patients. We conclude that this procedure is a therapeutic option that should be attempted before resorting to surgical therapy.
