QT PRODACT: in vivo QT assay in the conscious dog for assessing the potential for QT interval prolongation by human pharmaceuticals.

The goal of the present study was to examine the utility of the conscious dog model by assessing the QT-interval-prolonging potential of ten positive compounds that have been reported to induce QT interval prolongation in clinical use and seven negative compounds considered not to have such an effect. Three doses of test compounds or vehicle were administered orally to male beagle dogs (n=4), and telemetry signals were recorded for 24 h after administration. All positive compounds (astemizole, bepridil, cisapride, E-4031, haloperidol, MK-499, pimozide, quinidine, terfenadine, and thioridazine) caused a significant increase in the corrected QT (QTc) interval, with a greater than 10% increase achieved at high doses. In contrast, administration of negative compounds (amoxicillin, captopril, ciprofloxacin, diphenhydramine, nifedipine, propranolol, and verapamil) did not produce any significant change in the QTc interval, with the exception of nifedipine that may have produced an overcorrection of the QTc interval due to increased heart rate. The estimated plasma concentrations of the positive compounds that caused a 10% increase in the QTc interval were in good agreement with the plasma/serum concentrations achieved in humans who developed prolonged QT interval or torsade de pointes (TdP). Although careful consideration should be given to the interpretation of QT data with marked heart rate change, these data suggest that an in vivo QT assay using the conscious dog is a useful model for the assessment of QT interval prolongation by human pharmaceuticals.

QT PRODACT: sensitivity and specificity of the canine telemetry assay for detecting drug-induced QT interval prolongation.

The purpose of this investigation was to define the sensitivity and specificity of the canine telemetry assay for detecting drug-induced QT interval prolongation. Data from twelve studies generated in the QT PRODACT project were used in this investigation. The study design was a 4x4 Latin square cross-over design and included the following drugs: MK-499, E-4031, terfenadine, haloperidol, cisapride, bepridil, propranolol, diphenhydramine, captopril, verapamil, amoxicillin, and ciprofloxacin. The estimated root squared error of the model, which estimated the slope of the QT-RR relationships for each animal, for all dogs during the pre-dosing period was 5.45%. Using the QT-RR model, the sensitivity and specificity in each cutoff value that judges QT prolongation were estimated based on the experiment errors and measurement errors in the 12 studies. When the cutoff value was 5%, the sensitivity in 10% prolongation was 0.978 and the specificity in 0% was 0.996. In conclusion, it was judged that a 5% cutoff value for changes in heart rate corrected QT interval using the canine telemetry assay is practical, and the sensitivity and specificity of the telemetry assay are very high when using the analytical method presented here. Based upon this information, the canine telemetry assay using the individual subject heart rate correction model is recommended as a sensitive test system for the in vivo assessment of risk for QT interval prolongation.