ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Facial balance significantly impacts aesthetics, particularly in the middle and lower thirds. Patients with chin retrusion often benefit from sagittal plane chin advancement in rhinoplasty, enhancing surgical outcomes and satisfaction. OBJECTIVES: This article presents a method for analyzing chin deformities and discusses a hybrid treatment approach to harmonize facial features, complementing rhinoplasty. METHODS: The chin positions of patients treated by the senior author were assessed. A retrospective analysis included 49 patients with chin retrusion of 2.5-6 mm. Among them, 22 patients initially offered chin implants declined, leading to planned chin augmentation. Fat grafting was exclusively performed for 20 patients lacking sufficient cartilage. The "Hybrid Chin Advancement" technique involved supporting tissues beneath muscles with nasal septum cartilage and fat injections and tissues above muscles with fat injection alone. RESULTS: Pre- and postoperative Legan angle measurements and chin advancements were compared across three groups. While preoperative Legan angles were statistically similar, postoperative Legan angles and advancement changes were significantly higher in the implant group (p < 0.0001). Comparing hybrid chin advancement and fat grafting groups, postoperative Legan angles and advancement changes were significantly higher in the hybrid chin group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Fat grafting suffices for mild advancements (~ 2 mm), while the hybrid chin method is effective for moderate advancements (~ 4 mm). For advancements exceeding 6 mm, implants or osseous genioplasty are optimal. Our study's hybrid approach offers an easy, safe, and reliable method for achieving facial harmony in the lower two-thirds without compromising patient expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
ABSTRACT
Mammoplasty is a surgery commonly used for macromastia. Many mammoplasty techniques are described, all with their specific pros and cons. However, the concern to avoid serious complications sometimes takes precedence, and the ideal result cannot be. For macromastia and severely ptotic breasts, usually the free nipple-areolar complex (NAC) mammoplasty technique is implemented. The results, however, may only be completely satisfactory regarding cosmetics. Loss of NAC, poor appearance, flabbiness, flattening, and ptosis are among the disadvantages of this technique. This study aimed to present the results of mammoplasty employing the superomedial pedicle technique without interrupting a macromastia central base with a pedicle length of 8 to 18 cm. According to the literature, many plastic surgeons recommend the free NAC rather than the pedicle technique because of the high complication rates in mammoplasties planned for highly ptotic breasts and macromastia. On the other hand, many free NAC techniques and their modifications with pedicle mammoplasty are described. The general conviction is that a standard method, protocol, or technique good for all patients does not exist. Our results are more acceptable both cosmetically and physiologically. Therefore, the superomedial pedicle technique can be modified to achieve ideal results where free NAC mammoplasty is considered for severe macromastia and ptotic patients. This combined method contributes to the viability of NAC by increasing blood supply to breast tissue and providing an ideal breast appearance.
