ABSTRACT
Diagnostic and interventional radiology play a crucial role in healthcare, facilitating diagnosis of disease, treatment planning, interventional therapies, and assessment for response to treatment. However, many rural and remote regions are disproportionately limited in accessing high-quality radiological services. Challenges include limited imaging infrastructure in these communities, geographic isolation, and workforce shortages impacting provision of interventional image-guided procedures and subspecialty imaging in particular. However, a career in rural or remote radiology also presents unique opportunities including a deep sense of community, broad scope of practice, and immense benefit to patient care. This review aims to explore the landscape of rural and remote radiology with a focus on Canada, including opportunities, challenges, and potential strategies. Some of the challenges are shared by both rural and remote communities while others are distinct. Factors that have contributed to challenges in recruitment and retention of rural and remote radiologists include workload burden, inadequate or suboptimal imaging and interventional equipment, and limited exposure during training. Additionally, strategies to improve the provision of radiology services in rural and remote communities are highlighted, addressing both the workforce shortage and the lack of essential equipment and other resources.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Factors associated with time to return to work are poorly understood for occupational injuries, other than those to the back. METHODS: Anonymized data on claims for work-related wrist or ankle fracture between 1/1/1998 and 12/31/2002 were identified in administrative data held by the Workers Compensation Board in Alberta, Canada. Bivariate and Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with return to work. RESULTS: Increased duration of temporary disability (TD) was associated with older age, female gender, work in construction and construction trade services, smaller company size, higher industry claim rates, a fall/jump from a height, ankle fracture, and greater medical aid costs in the 30 days following injury (used as a proxy for severity). CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with longer time off work were largely consistent with those reported following back injury. Median time to return to work was longer following ankle than wrist fracture. Although Workers' Compensation Board (WCB) administrative data provided information that could be used to identify factors affecting return to work, better information on injury severity would considerably enhance their research potential.
