Outcome of hyaluronic acid gel injection in glans penis for treatment of lifelong premature ejaculation: A pilot study.

Objective: To assess safety and efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA) gel injection in glans penis for treatment of premature ejaculation (PE) using our new five puncture technique. Patients and methods: This is a prospective, non-randomized clinical trial on HA gel injection in glans penis for all patients with lifelong PE; all patients were circumcised having heterosexual normal marital life and sexually active. Patients with history of ejaculatory medication use within the previous 3 months, psychiatric disorders, erectile dysfunction, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to prostatitis and acquired PE were excluded from the study. A local anesthetic was applied to the skin of glans penis for 30 minutes before the injection of 2 ml HA in glans penis via 30-gauge needle using our new Five-puncture technique. Intra-vaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was measured at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection. Results: Thirty patients completed our study follow up schedule. Mean age of the patients was 41.72 ± 8.50, while mean age of female partner was 37.23 ± 8.54 years. IELT was highly significantly increased (P-value < 0.001) after HA gel injection from baseline, which was in maximum 37.83 ± 11.01 sec at baseline to 323.03 ± 42.06, 281.07 ± 41.05, 241.03 ± 43.09 and 235.6 ± 41.87 sec after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively, after injection. Three patients complained from discomfort at the site of injection, two from bullae formation at the site of injection and one from ecchymosis, and all resolved spontaneously after 1 week to 10 days after injection. Conclusion: HA gel injection in glans penis using our new five-puncture technique is a safe and effective method that ensures a modest long-term significant increase in IELT and improves ejaculatory control.

Pediatric Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using Self-Retained Screwed Amplatz Sheath vs Ordinary Sheath.

Objective: To evaluate the use of a new 16F mini-screwed sheath in pediatrics in comparison to a 16F ordinary Amplatz sheath. Methods: Sixty-seven patients <18 years with renal calculi between 1 and 2 cm who was a candidate for mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-perc) between January 2019 and September 2021 were randomized by closed envelope in group A (34 patients) using new mini-screwed sheath and group B (33 patients) with ordinary mini-sheath. Patients with contraindications for percutaneous nephrolithotomy were excluded. Results: No significant difference was present between both groups according to patients and stone demographics. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding puncture site and number. The mean operative time was 51.25 ± 2.15 minutes and 52.35 ± 3.45 minutes in groups A and B, respectively. The fluoroscopy time was significantly lower in group A (2.1 ± 0.85 minutes) than in group B (2.9 ± 1.05 minutes). Tract loss was 18.2% in group B while 0% in group A. Although bleeding was less in group A, it was nonsignificant. The stone-free rate was (94.11%) and (90.9%) in group A and group B, respectively. Conclusion: Screwed sheath enables the urologist to have a stable track during pediatric mini-perc surgery despite the thin abdominal wall in the pediatric. The screw sheath provides significantly lower fluoroscopy time and decreases the need for nephrostomy tube insertion when compared with ordinary sheath in mini-perc renal surgery.

Flank-Free Modified Supine vs Prone Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Treatment of Medium-Sized Renal Pelvic Stone: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Introduction and Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard treatment of renal stone >2 cm. Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP) had emerged in the past decade as a new technique in treating renal stones <2 cm. In this study we compared between the outcome of UMP in prone position with the outcome of UMP in modified flank free supine position (FFSP). Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted between January 2016 and April 2020, including 122 patients, divided into two matched groups. Group A included 61 patients who underwent UMP in FFSP, and Group B included 61 patients who underwent UMP in a prone position. All patients had a single renal pelvic stone 1-2 cm. Patients with a single kidney, renal anomalies, body mass index ≥40 kg/m2, history of ipsilateral renal surgery, and age <18 years were excluded. In both groups, the dilatation was done up to 13F; a holmium laser was used through a 9F ureteroscope for fragmentation. Nephrostomy tube and ureteral stent were used only when indicated. Results: In total, 122 patients were divided into two groups. The mean age was 40.09 ± 13.63 and 39.67 ± 13.80 years in both groups, respectively. The operative time was 63.64 ± 9.22 and 78.48 ± 9.55 minutes in Groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.0001). The fluoroscopy time was 3.47 ± 0.56 and 4.45 ± 0.39 minutes in Groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.0001). No significant difference was shown between both groups regarding operative and postoperative complications. Shift to mini-PCNL was needed in one patient in Group A and four patients in Group B because of impaired vision. The hospital stay was 25.36 ± 4.23 and 26.13 ± 4.76 hours in both groups, respectively. The initial stone-free rate was 95.1% and 91.8% in both groups, respectively. Conclusions: UMP in modified supine position shows comparable results with UMP in the prone position regarding stone-free rate, hospital stay, and perioperative complication, with significantly shorter operative and fluoroscopy time.

Role of Preoperative Testicular Shear Wave Elastography in Predicting Improvement of Semen Parameters After Varicocelectomy for Male Patients With Primary Infertility.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of preoperative testicular shear wave elastography (SWE) in the prediction of improvement of semen analysis parameters after subinguinal microsurgical varicocele ligation in patients with primary infertility and clinically detectable varicocele. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Testicular SWE before the surgical intervention was done. Forty-eight patients were scheduled for subinguinal microsurgical varicocele ligation as a treatment option. Computer-assisted semen analysis was repeated 6 months after the intervention. RESULTS: At a cutoff value of 4.5 kPa, the stiffness index had a sensitivity of 86.4% and a specificity of 84.2% for semen parameter improvement after varicocelectomy. Correlation between different parameters of semen analysis and SWE showed a statistically significant negative correlation between SWE stiffness index and both sperm count (million/mL) and total motility. On the other hand, a nonsignificant negative correlation was found between SWE stiffness index and percentage of normal form. CONCLUSION: Testicular SWE is a good test that can be used in the assessment of male infertility with clinically detectable varicocele, and its results may predict semen parameter improvement after varicocelectomy. Further studies on a larger number of patients are needed to verify our results.