ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Xpert(®) MTB/RIF assay can diagnose tuberculosis (TB) rapidly and with great accuracy. The effect of Xpert placement at point of care (POC) vs. at an off-site laboratory on patient management remains unknown. DESIGN: At a primary care clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa, we compared TB diagnosis and treatment initiation among 1861 individuals evaluated for pulmonary TB using Xpert performed either at POC or offsite. RESULTS: When Xpert was performed at POC, a higher proportion of Xpert-positive individuals started treatment (95% vs. 87%, P = 0.047) and time to treatment initiation was shorter (median 0 vs. 5 days, P < 0.001). In contrast, among Xpert-negative TB cases, a higher proportion (87% vs. 72%, P = 0.001) started treatment when the sample was sent to the laboratory, with a shorter time to treatment (median 9 vs. 13 days, P = 0.056). While the overall proportion of presumed TB patients starting treatment was independent of Xpert placement, the proportion started based on a bacteriologically confirmed diagnosis was higher when Xpert was performed at POC (73% vs. 58%, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of Xpert at POC resulted in more Xpert-positive patients receiving treatment, but did not increase the total number of presumed TB patients starting treatment. When samples were sent to a laboratory for Xpert testing, empiric decision making increased.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/complications , Laboratories/statistics & numerical data , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Point-of-Care Systems/statistics & numerical data , Sputum/microbiology , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Adult , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , South AfricaABSTRACT
SETTING: Primary care clinic serving a high tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence community in South Africa. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a program combining TB and HIV contact investigation with tracing of individuals lost to TB or HIV care. DESIGN: Contacts were offered home-based HIV testing, TB symptom screening, sputum collection and referral for isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT). Effectiveness was assessed by the number needed to trace (NNT). RESULTS: Only 419/1197 (35.0%) households were successfully traced. Among 267 contacts, we diagnosed 27 new HIV cases (10 linked to care) and two TB cases (both initiated treatment) and three started IPT. Of 630 patients lost to care, 132 (21.0%) were successfully traced and 81 (61.4%) re-engaged in care. The NNT to locate one individual lost to care was 4.8 (95%CI 4.1-5.6), to re-engage one person in care 7.8 (95%CI 6.4-9.7), to diagnose one contact with HIV 44.3 (95%CI 30.6-67.0), to link one newly diagnosed contact to HIV care 120 (95%CI 65.3-249.2) and to find one contact with active TB and initiate treatment 599 (95%CI 166.0-4940.7). CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of this contact tracing approach in identifying new TB and HIV cases was low. Methods to optimize contact investigation should be explored and their cost-effectiveness assessed.
