Zoledronic acid combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy of tamoxifen versus anastrozol plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal early breast cancer: final analysis of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 12.

BACKGROUND: Zoledronic acid (ZOL) plus adjuvant endocrine therapy significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) at 48- and 62-month follow-up in the ABCSG-12 trial. We present efficacy results of a final additional analysis after 94.4 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were premenopausal women who had undergone primary surgery for stage I/II estrogen-receptor-positive and/or progesterone-receptor-positive breast cancer with <10 positive lymph nodes, and were scheduled for standard goserelin therapy. All 1803 patients received goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days) and were randomized to tamoxifen (20 mg/days) or anastrozole (1 mg/days), both with or without ZOL (4 mg every 6 months) for 3 years. The primary end point was DFS; recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) were secondary end points. RESULTS: After 94.4-month median follow-up (range, 0-114 months), relative risks of disease progression [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.99; P = 0.042] and of death (HR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.43-1.02; P = 0.064) are still reduced by ZOL although no longer significant at the predefined significance level. Overall, 251 DFS events and 86 deaths were reported. Absolute risk reductions with ZOL were 3.4% for DFS and 2.2% for OS. There was no DFS difference between tamoxifen alone versus anastrozole alone, but there was a pronounced higher risk of death for anastrozole-treated patients (HR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.05-1.45; P = 0.030). Treatments were generally well tolerated, with no reports of renal failure or osteonecrosis of the jaw. CONCLUSION: These final results from ABCSG 12 suggest that twice-yearly ZOL enhances the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine treatment, and this benefit is maintained long-term. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT00295646 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=00295646).

Efficacy of tamoxifen ± aminoglutethimide in normal weight and overweight postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: an analysis of 1509 patients of the ABCSG-06 trial.

BACKGROUND: There exists evidence that body mass index (BMI) impacts on the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in patients with breast cancer. The relationship between BMI and the efficacy of tamoxifen is conflicting. We investigated the impact of BMI on the efficacy of single tamoxifen and tamoxifen plus an aromatase inhibitor in the well-defined prospective study population of the ABCSG-06 trial. METHODS: ABCSG-06 investigated the efficacy of tamoxifen vs tamoxifen plus aminoglutethimide in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Taking BMI at baseline, patients were classified as normal weight (BMI=18.5-24.9 kg m(-)(2)), overweight (BMI=25-29.9 kg m(-)(2)), and obese (30 kg m(-)(2)) according to WHO criteria. RESULTS: Overweight+obese patients had an increased risk for distant recurrences (hazard ratio (HR): 1.51; Cox P=0·018) and a worse overall survival (OS; HR: 1·49; Cox P=0·052) compared with normal weight patients. Analysing patients treated with single tamoxifen only, no difference between overweight+obese patients and normal weight patients regarding distant recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.35; Cox P=0·24) and OS (HR: 0.99; Cox P=0·97) could be observed. In contrast, in the group of patients treated with the combination of tamoxifen plus aminoglutethimide, overweight+obese patients had an increased risk for distant recurrences (1.67; Cox P=0·03) and a worse OS (1.47; Cox P=0·11) compared with normal weight patients. CONCLUSION: BMI impacts on the efficacy of aromatase inhibitor-based treatment but not single tamoxifen.

Intraoperative frozen section examination of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Intraoperative frozen section (FS) examination of the Sentinel node (SN) in breast cancer patients is questioned due to the relatively high number of positive SN(s) found in the permanent histological examination. This study reviews the data of the Austrian sentinel node study group on FS examination of the SN and tries to identify patients with a high risk of incorrect negative results. METHODS: 2326 breast cancer patients of the Austrian Sentinel node study group who underwent SN biopsy and intraoperative FS examination of the SN were further analysed for incorrect negative results and clinicopathologic factors indicating a higher rate of incorrect negative results. RESULTS: The FS of the SN was positive in 513 of 2326 patients (22.1%) and negative in 1813 of 2326 patients (77.9%). Permanent histological examination revealed a metastatic SN in 282 of 1813 patients. (incorrect negative rate 15.6%). 158 of 282 patients (56%) were found through H&E serial sectioning, whereas 124 of 282 patients (44%) were only seen in immunohistochemistry. Micrometastases, lobular histology and preoperative chemotherapy were associated with a higher rate of incorrect negative results. CONCLUSION: Incorrect negative results of FS examination are seen in 15% of patients and require a secondary axillary lymph node dissection. The disadvantage of missing a positive SN through FS is by far outweighed by the advantage of a single stage operation in case of a positive SN.

Association of GB virus C (GBV-C)/hepatitis G virus (HGV) with haematological diseases of different malignant potential.

Among risk groups for GB virus C (GBV-C)/HGV infection, patients with haematological diseases are particularly exposed due to the combination of transfusional support and immunodeficiency status. To examine any association between GBV-C/HGV positivity and different malignancy potential of hematological diseases, we investigated two groups of patients, one with clonal stem cell disease with long latency period (myelodysplasia, myeloproliferative disease) and one with malignant haematological diseases (Hodgkin's lymphoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, acute leukemia, multiple myeloma). Virus positivity was compared with the data from cytogenetic analysis at first diagnosis. The frequency of GBV-C/HGV infection in these patients was studied using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and E2 antibody assay. Serum GBV-C RNA was found in 29/47 (62%) patients. The prevalence of GBV-C RNA in the group of oncological cases (72%) was significantly higher (P= .02) than in the patients with clonal stem cell diseases (28%). Among the GBV-C negative cases, only 25% had malignant haematological diseases. The data from GBV-C/ HGV tested cases for which cytogenetic analysis was carried out indicated an association of GBV-C/HGV positivity with genomic destabilization in general. Of the cases with numerical and structural aberrations, 64% were GBV-C positive. A correlation could not be confirmed between GBV-C/HGV and liver enzyme levels, blood transfusions, chemotherapy treatment, or viral coinfection. These findings suggest a high risk of GBV-C/HGV infection in patients with haematological disorders especially in the group of malignant diseases. These observations may indicate that the persistence of GBV-C/HGV in these patients could be associated with susceptibility to genomic destabilisation.

Monitoring of hematopoietic recovery after autologous stem cell transplantation by analysis of G alpha 16 mRNA and CD34 surface glycoprotein.

The hematopoiesis-specific G protein alpha subunit G alpha16 was shown to be expressed in early normal and malignant hematopoietic cell lines and has been suggested to play an important role in signal transduction of hematopoiesis. We previously demonstrated a strict correlation of G alpha16 mRNA and CD34 antigen expression in peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). In PBSC mobilization, both markers are detectable at the time of hematopoietic recovery and progenitor cell release. In this study the possible use of G alpha16 determination in peripheral blood samples for monitoring patients undergoing stem cell transplantation was investigated. Normal peripheral blood is negative for G alpha16 expression. In all five patients G alpha16 mRNA expression appeared shortly before the time of blood cell recovery. When tested together with CD34 (three cases) a pattern different from CD34 antigen expression was found, reflecting a different mechanism of action. In two cases with different time points of leukocyte and platelet recovery G alpha16 mRNA was detected at both time points but not in the interval, thus suggesting a role of G alpha16 in multipotent precursor cells. CD34 mRNA tested in three patients was not detected at any time; this argues for different regulation of CD34 and G alpha16 mRNA. G alpha16 may be used as an indicator of hematopoietic recovery after autologous stem cell transplantation, suggesting that there are cell type-specific G protein-mediated signal transduction pathways of early hematopoiesis.

Expression of G alpha 16, a G-protein alpha subunit specific for hematopoiesis in acute leukemia.

G-proteins are essential in signal transduction pathways. A G-protein alpha subunit termed G alpha 16 was found to be exclusively expressed in hematopoietic cell lines. In cells derived from patients, G alpha 16 expression has been detected in progenitor- and pre-B ALL cells and also in peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). In this study, we analyzed G alpha 16 expression using a RT-PCR technique by testing elutriated blood cells from normal donors, PBSC from breast cancer patients and bone marrow or peripheral blood cells from acute leukemia patients. Both of two ALL patients and 15/16 AML patients expressed G alpha 16. In elutriation experiments, G alpha 16 expression was found in fractions containing the highest number of precursor cells but was absent in mature T and B cell fractions. In addition, CD34-enriched PBSC were positive for G alpha 16 expression. Further in vitro experiments using the cell line KG1 showed that G alpha 16 expression was not affected by the growth inhibiting hemoregulatory peptide pEEDCK which has a sequence homology present within G alpha 16. Taken together, these data demonstrate that G alpha 16 is expressed in various normal and malignant hematopietic progenitors but not in their differentiated counterparts. G alpha 16 could play a vital role in signal transduction pathways controlling proliferation in early normal and malignant hematopoiesis.