Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 9(13): 1338-46, 2016 07 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27388820

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to prospectively study and confirm the safety and efficacy of the Tryton Side Branch Stent in the treatment of coronary artery bifurcations involving large side branches (SBs). BACKGROUND: The TRYTON Pivotal randomized controlled trial (RCT) was designed to compare the Tryton stent with standard provisional SB stenting in large vessels. The trial inadvertently enrolled patients with too small SBs (<2.25 mm). The overall trial did not meet its primary endpoint, because of an increased rate of periprocedural myocardial infarction in the Tryton stent arm. A post hoc analysis restricted to the intended population showed that the trial would have met its endpoint if only patients with SBs ≥2.25 mm in diameter (by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography) had been enrolled. METHODS: The Tryton Confirmatory Study was a prospective, single-arm extension of the TRYTON Pivotal RCT that enrolled an additional 133 patients treated with the Tryton Side Branch Stent. It was designed to confirm the results of the post hoc analysis and emphasized the inclusion of appropriately sized SBs. The primary endpoint was noninferiority with regard to periprocedural myocardial infarction (creatine kinase myocardial band 3 times the upper limit of normal) compared with a performance goal based on the TRYTON Pivotal RCT. RESULTS: Among the 133 enrolled patients, 132 (99.2%) had SBs ≥2.25 mm. Baseline clinical and angiographic parameters were similar in this study and the RCT. Periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in 10.5% of patients, which was numerically lower than the provisional group in the TRYTON Pivotal RCT (11.9%). The 95% confidence bounds did not extend beyond the pre-defined performance goal of 17.9%, meeting the noninferiority primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: The Tryton Confirmatory Study, in conjunction with the post hoc analysis of the intended population in the TRYTON Pivotal RCT, supports the safety and efficacy of the Tryton Side Branch Stent for treatment of bifurcation lesions involving large SBs.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/instrumentation , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Coronary Vessels , Stents , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Biomarkers/blood , Chromium Alloys , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Creatine Kinase, MB Form/blood , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/blood , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
2.
J Endovasc Ther ; 20(6): 770-81, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24325693

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the optical coherence tomography-guided Ocelot catheter to cross femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions (CTOs). METHODS: The CONNECT II study was a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized single-arm study of the safety and effectiveness of the Ocelot catheter in CTO crossing. Key inclusion criteria were a 99% to 100% stenosed femoropopliteal segment, lesion length between 1 and 30 cm, and resistance to guidewire crossing. The main exclusion criterion was a severely calcified target vessel. The primary safety endpoint was 30-day major adverse events (MAE), while the primary effectiveness endpoint was successful CTO crossing (i.e., guidewire placement in the distal true lumen) with the Ocelot catheter. Endpoint analysis was based on pre-specified objective performance criteria. Between February and June 2012, 100 patients (55 men; mean age 69 years) were enrolled. Most of the CTOs (94%) were in the superficial femoral artery (SFA); mean lesion length was 16.6±9.3 cm. RESULTS: Through 30 days, 2 patients experienced MAE (significant perforations) related to the Ocelot catheter. The Ocelot catheter successfully crossed 97% of target CTOs either alone (72%), in conjunction with an assist device (18%), or in conjunction with a re-entry device (7%). Both primary safety and effectiveness endpoints were met. CONCLUSION: The Ocelot catheter with optical coherence tomography guidance offers physicians a reliable option for crossing femoral and popliteal chronic total occlusions with low MAE rates.


Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Femoral Artery , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Popliteal Artery , Vascular Access Devices , Aged , Chronic Disease , Clinical Competence , Constriction, Pathologic , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Equipment Design , Europe , Female , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Learning Curve , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Time Factors , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Outcome , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...