Impact of whole-body 18F-FDG PET on staging and managing patients with breast cancer: the referring physician's perspective.

UNLABELLED: FDG PET has emerged as an important clinical imaging modality for diagnosing and staging cancer. However, the impact of FDG PET on staging and managing patients with breast cancer from the referring physician's point of view is unknown. METHODS: The referring physicians of 160 breast cancer patients received standardized questionnaires inquiring if and how PET findings altered their patient's stage and their clinical management decisions. Management changes were classified as intermodality if the change was from one modality to another (e.g., medical to surgical, surgical to radiation, medical to no treatment, and vice versa) or as intramodality if the change was within the same modality (e.g., altered medical or radiotherapy approach). RESULTS: Fifty of the 160 surveys were completed (31% response rate). PET changed the clinical stage in 36% of patients (28% upstaged, 8% downstaged) and resulted in intermodality changes in 28% of patients and intramodality changes in 30% of patients. CONCLUSION: The results of this prospective survey show that FDG PET has a major impact on the management of breast cancer patients, influencing both clinical stage and management in more than 30% of patients.

Comparison of helical computerized tomography, positron emission tomography and monoclonal antibody scans for evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate specific antigen relapse after treatment for localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We compare the detection of metastatic disease by helical computerized tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET) with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose and monoclonal antibody scan with 111indium capromab pendetide in patients with an elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) after treatment for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 45 patients with an elevated PSA (median 3.8 ng./ml.) were studied following definitive local therapy with radical prostatectomy in 33, radiation therapy in 9 and cryosurgery in 3. CT of the abdomen and pelvis, and whole body PET were performed in all patients, of whom 21 also underwent monoclonal antibody scan. Lymph nodes 1 cm. in diameter or greater on CT were considered abnormal and were sampled by fine needle aspiration in 12 patients. RESULTS: PET and CT were positive for distant disease in 50% of 22 patients with PSA greater than 4, and in 4 and 17%, respectively, of 23 with PSA less than 4 ng./ml. The detection rate for metastatic disease was similar for CT and PET, and higher overall than that for monoclonal antibody scan. Monoclonal antibody scan was true positive in only 1 of 6 patients, while PET was true positive in 6 of 9 with CT guided fine needle aspiration proved metastases. CONCLUSIONS: CT and PET each detected evidence of metastatic disease in 50% of all patients with a high PSA or PSA velocity (greater than 4 ng./ml. or greater than 0.2 ng./ml. per month, respectively). Both techniques are limited for detecting metastatic disease in patients with a low PSA or PSA velocity. Our data suggest that monoclonal antibody scan has a lower detection rate than CT or PET.

ROC and localization ROC analyses of lesion detection in whole-body FDG PET: effects of acquisition mode, attenuation correction and reconstruction algorithm.

UNLABELLED: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and localization ROC (LROC) studies were performed to compare lesion detection at the borderline of detectability on images reconstructed with two-dimensional filtered backprojection (FBP) without attenuation correction (a common clinical protocol), three-dimensional FBP without attenuation correction, two-dimensional FBP with segmented attenuation correction and a two-dimensional iterative maximum a posteriori (MAP) algorithm using attenuation correction. Lung cancer was the model for the study because of the prominent role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the staging of lung cancer and the importance of lesion detection for staging. METHODS: Simulated lung cancer lesions were added to two-dimensional and three-dimensional PET data from healthy volunteers. Data were reconstructed using the four methods. Four nuclear medicine physicians evaluated the images. Detection performance with each method was compared using ROC and LROC analysis. Jackknife analysis provided estimates of statistical significance for differences across all readers for the ROC results. RESULTS: ROC and LROC results indicated statistically significant degradation in detection performance with three-dimensional acquisition (average area under ROC curves [Az] 0.51; average area under LROC curves [A(z,LROC)] 0.13) and segmented attenuation correction (average Az 0.59; average Az,LROC 0.29) compared with two-dimensional FBP without attenuation correction (average Az 0.79; average A(z,LROC) 0.54). ROC and LROC results indicated an improvement in detection performance with iterative MAP reconstruction (average Az 0.83; average A(z,LROC) 0.64) compared with two-dimensional FBP reconstruction; this improvement was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Use of segmented attenuation correction or three-dimensional acquisition with FBP reconstruction is not expected to improve detection of lung lesions on whole-body PET images compared with images with two-dimensional FBP without attenuation correction. The potential improvement in detection obtained with an iterative MAP reconstruction method is small compared with that obtained with two-dimensional FBP without attenuation correction.

Positron emission tomography in urological oncology.

PURPOSE: We provide scientists and clinicians with an introduction to the basic principles and methods of positron emission tomography (PET) and summarize the recent research and clinical applications of PET in the urological field. Specifically, we introduce PET so that the reader can understand and objectively review current and future articles that involve this imaging technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The recent applications of PET in urology in the published literature were searched and reviewed. RESULTS: In prostate carcinoma preliminary studies using radiotracer 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) demonstrated that PET cannot reliably differentiate between primary prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia, and that PET is not as sensitive as bone scintigraphy for the detection of osseous metastases. However, PET may have a role in the detection of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate specific antigen relapse after primary local therapy. In renal cell carcinoma recent studies have shown the ability of FDG PET to detect primary and metastatic lesions and to monitor response to therapy. In the staging of testicular cancer FDG PET has been used to differentiate viable carcinoma from benign teratomas and/or fibrotic or necrotic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Current developments in PET technology that accurately stage the extent of tumor before surgery as well as monitor effectiveness or ineffectiveness of new or current therapies may make PET a valuable tool in research and in the management of urological diseases.

Evaluating tumor biology and oncological disease with positron-emission tomography.

The usefulness of positron-emission tomography (PET) for noninvasive assessment of several biological parameters of neoplastic tissue has been reviewed. Numerous radiotracers have been developed, whose particular distribution in the presence of cancer in vivo serves to distinguish medically relevant properties of the tumor cells with which they associate. That distribution is most accurately determined through use of a PET scanner, to localize and quantify the tracer molecules, in which have been incorporated positron-emitting isotopes. These tracers include hypoxia markers, receptor ligands, substrates for enzymatic modification by the products of expression of specific genes, and precursors of protein anabolism and carbohydrate catabolism. In addition, application of PET to evaluation of patients with some particular cancers has been examined, while placing special emphasis on the level of scientific rigor of the evidence underlying conclusions about appropriate use of PET in oncology.

Cholesterol crystals in hydroceles: sonographic detection and possible significance.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study of seven patients who had elective surgical repairs of a hydrocele was to try to differentiate by microscopy and chemical analysis hyperechoic hydrocele fluid from the more typical anechoic hydrocele fluid. CONCLUSION: Hyperechoic hydrocele fluid is related to the presence of cholesterol crystals. Cholesterol crystals were noted on microscopic examination in all three patients with hyperechoic hydrocele fluid. No cholesterol crystals were evident in the four patients with typical anechoic hydrocele fluid.

PET in oncology: will it replace the other modalities?

Medical imaging technology is rapidly expanding and the role of each modality is being redefined constantly. PET has been around since the early sixties and gained clinical acceptance in oncology only after an extreme number of scientific publications. Although PET has the unique ability to image biochemical processes in vivo, this ability is not fully used as a clinical imaging tool. In this overview, the role of PET in relation to other tumor imaging modalities will be discussed and the reported results in the literature will be reviewed. In predicting the future of PET, technical improvements of other imaging modalities need to be dealt with. The fundamental physical principles for image formation with computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), photon-emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission CT (SPECT) will not change. The potential variety of radiopharmaceuticals which may be developed is unlimited, however, and this provides nuclear imaging techniques with a significant advantage and adaptive features for future biologic imaging. The current applications of PET in oncology have been in characterizing tumor lesions, differentiating recurrent disease from treatment effects, staging tumors, evaluating the extent of disease, and monitoring therapy. The future developments in medicine may use the unique capabilities of PET not only in diagnostic imaging but also in molecular medicine and genetics. The articles discussed in this review were selected from a literature search covering the last 3 years, and in which comparisons of PET with conventional imaging were addressed specifically. PET studies with the glucose analogue fluorine-18-labeled deoxyglucose (FDG) have shown the ability of detecting tumor foci in a variety of histological neoplasms such as thyroid cancer, breast cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, head and neck carcinoma, colorectal cancer, ovarian carcinoma, and musculoskeletal tumors. Also, the contribution of the whole body PET (WBPET) imaging technique in diagnosis will be discussed. In the current health care environment, a successful imaging technology must not only change medical management but also demonstrate that those changes improve patient outcome.

Dietary manipulation with lemonade to treat hypocitraturic calcium nephrolithiasis.

PURPOSE: Pharmacological treatment of hypocitraturic calcium nephrolithiasis requires as many as 12 tablets, or numerous crystal packages or liquid supplements taken throughout the day. In addition to added cost, this cumbersome regimen decreases patient compliance, which may increase stone recurrence rates. We evaluated the urinary biochemical effects of dietary citrate supplementation in hypocitraturic calcium stone formers in an attempt to decrease or eliminate the need for pharmacological therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 12 patients who were either noncompliant with or intolerant of pharmacological citrate therapy supplemented their routine diet with citrate in the form of lemonade, consisting of 4 ounces of reconstituted lemon juice (5.9 gm. citric acid) mixed with tap water to a total volume of 2 l. and consumed at uniform intervals throughout the day. Urine specimens (24-hour) were obtained for biochemical analysis after 6 days of lemonade therapy and compared to pre-lemonade baseline values. RESULTS: Of the 12 patients 11 had increased urinary citrate levels during lemonade therapy (average 204 mg. per day). Average levels increased from 142 mg. daily (range less than 10 to 293) at baseline to 346 mg. daily (range 89 to 814) after treatment (p < 0.001). Daily total urinary volumes were similar (2.7 versus 2.9 l.). Seven of 12 patients became normocitraturic while consuming lemonade. Urinary calcium excretion decreased an average of 39 mg. daily, while oxalate excretion was unchanged. The lemonade mixture was well tolerated. Two patients complained of mild indigestion that did not require cessation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Citrate supplementation with lemonade increased urinary citrate levels more than 2-fold without changing total urinary volume. Lemon juice, which contains nearly 5 times the concentration of citric acid compared to orange juice, is an inexpensive and well tolerated dietary source of citrate. Lemonade therapy may improve patient compliance, and may be useful as adjunctive treatment for patients with hypocitraturic calcium nephrolithiasis.

Comparison of systematic sextant and lesion directed biopsies in prostate cancer detection.

This study was designed to determine the value of performing separate lesion directed biopsies in addition to systematic random sextant biopsies for the detection, grading, and assessment of bilaterality of prostate cancer. A prospective study of 82 consecutive patients who had peripheral zone hypoechoic regions visualized on transrectal ultrasound was performed. All patients had either an abnormal prostate-specific antigen or an abnormal digital rectal examination and underwent random systematic and lesion directed biopsies. Cancer detection, laterality, and histologic grade of lesion directed biopsies were compared with those from systematic random biopsies. Prostate cancer was detected in 35 (40%) of 82 patients who had a hypoechoic lesion visualized. Three (9%) cancers would have been missed if only systematic biopsies had been performed, while nine (26%) cancers would have been missed if only lesion directed biopsies had been performed. In all but one patient, the Gleason score of the lesion directed biopsy was equal to or within one grade of the highest Gleason score determined from systematic biopsy. Systematic random biopsies detected cancer on the opposite side of a positive lesion directed biopsy in 48% of patients. In no case did a lesion directed biopsy add to the detection of bilateral disease. In conclusion, lesion directed biopsies increase the detection of prostate cancer when performed in addition to systematic random sextant biopsies. However, lesion directed biopsies alone would result in a substantial miss rate of prostate cancer. They do not add to the determination of bilateral disease, nor do they add to the pathologic grading of the detected cancer.