Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 15(4): 413-6, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22076690

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ligation of the intersphincteric tract (LIFT), a novel sphincter-saving technique, has been recently described with promising results. Literature data are still scant. In this prospective observational study, we present our experience with this technique. METHODS: Between October 2010 and April 2011, 18 patients with 'complex' fistulas underwent LIFT. All patients were enrolled in the study after a physical examination including digital examination and proctoscopy. For the purpose of this pilot study, fistulas were classified as complex if any of the following conditions were present: tract crossing more than 30% of the external sphincter, anterior fistula in a woman, recurrent fistula or pre-existing incontinence. Endpoints were healing time, presence of recurrence, faecal incontinence and surgical complications. RESULTS: Ten patients were men and 8 were women; mean age was 39 years; minimum follow-up was 4 months. Three patients required drainage seton insertion and delayed LIFT. After LIFT, 1 patient experienced haemorrhoidal thrombosis. At the end of the follow-up, 15 patients (83%) healed with no recurrence. Three patients had persistent symptoms and required further surgical treatment. We did not observe postoperative worsening of continence. CONCLUSIONS: Results from our pilot study indicate that this novel sphincter-saving approach is effective and safe for treating complex anal fistula.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/surgery , Rectal Fistula/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Ligation/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Proctoscopy , Prospective Studies , Rectal Fistula/diagnosis , Secondary Prevention , Suture Techniques , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Tech Coloproctol ; 15(1): 31-7, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21153854

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Different trials have investigated the role of conventional anal manometry in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders. The aim of the present study is to define the role and the effectiveness of vector anal manometry and vector asymmetry index scoring in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders i.e. fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2007, 387 patients underwent clinical and manometric evaluation in the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy, and were included in the present prospective cohort study. All the patients underwent clinical examination, Wexner incontinence scoring, and anal vector manometry and were classified into three groups. Group I included patients with normal resting anal pressure values (195 patients). Groups II and III consisted of patients with resting anal pressure higher and lower than normal values, respectively (90 and 102 patients, respectively). All patients were classified into asymmetric and non-asymmetric according to the vector asymmetry index using a cut-off of 20%. We investigated the correlation between anal asymmetry and pelvic floor disorders, i.e. fecal incontinence due to sphincter injury, rectal prolapse, and obstructed defecation. RESULTS: In Group III, the number of asymmetric patients was significantly higher than non-asymmetric ones (P < 0.0001). Asymmetry values were significantly higher in group III than in groups I and II considering squeeze (P < 0.0001) or resting pressures (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant association between anal asymmetry and both anal incontinence (P < 0.0001) and rectal prolapse (P = 0.0270). No such association was found between anal asymmetry and obstructed defecation. CONCLUSION: Anal vector manometry using vector analysis of resting and squeeze pressures is complementary to endoanal ultrasonography, as it provides information on anal sphincter function and integrity. The vector asymmetry index >20% correlates with fecal incontinence due to anal sphincter lesions. Therefore, anal vector manometry may be useful as an independent method of screening for pregnant women at risk of sphincter injury and for patients undergoing anorectal surgery with risk factors for incontinence, like previous anorectal surgery or a history of two or more previous vaginal deliveries.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/physiopathology , Anus Diseases/physiopathology , Defecation/physiology , Fecal Incontinence/physiopathology , Manometry/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anal Canal/injuries , Anus Diseases/diagnosis , Anus Diseases/etiology , Chi-Square Distribution , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Fecal Incontinence/diagnostic imaging , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Rectal Prolapse/complications , Risk Factors , Statistics, Nonparametric , Ultrasonography , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...