Does spinal cord stimulation improve gait in Parkinson's disease: A comprehensive review.

INTRODUCTION: Axial disability, including gait disturbances, is common in Parkinson's disease (PD), especially in advanced stages. Epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been investigated as a treatment option for gait disorders in PD. Here, we review the literature on SCS in PD and evaluate its efficacy, optimal stimulation parameters, optimal electrode locations, possible effects of concurrent deep brain stimulation, and possible working mechanisms on gait. METHODS: Databases were searched for human studies involving PD patients who received an epidural SCS intervention and who had at least one gait-related outcome measure. The included reports were reviewed with respect to design and outcomes. Additionally, the possible mechanisms of action underlying SCS were reviewed. RESULTS: Out of 433 records identified, 25 unique studies with in total 103 participants were included. Most studies included only a few participants. The gait disorders of most PD patients with concurrent pain complaints, mostly low back pain, improved with SCS in almost all cases, regardless of stimulation parameters or electrode location. Higher-frequency stimulation (>200 Hz) seemed to be more effective in pain-free PD patients, but the results were inconsistent. Heterogeneity in outcome measures and follow-up times hindered comparability. CONCLUSIONS: SCS may improve gait in PD patients with neuropathic pain, but its efficacy in pain-free patients remains uncertain due to a lack of thorough double-blind studies. Apart from a well-powered, controlled, double-blind study design, future studies could further explore the initial hints that higher-frequency stimulation (>200 Hz) might be the best approach to improve gait outcomes in pain-free patients.

The Role of Microelectrode Recording in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: STN-DBS is a cornerstone in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The traditional approach is to use an awake operative technique with microelectrode recording (MER). However, more centers start using an asleep MRI-guided technique without MER. OBJECTIVE: We systematically reviewed the literature to compare STN-DBS surgery with and without MER for differences in clinical outcome. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases for randomized clinical trials and consecutive cohort studies published between 01-01-2000 and 26-08-2021, that included at least 10 PD patients who had received bilateral STN-DBS. RESULTS: 2,129 articles were identified. After abstract screening and full-text review, 26 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total of 34 study groups (29 MER and 5 non-MER). The standardized mean difference (SMD) in change in motor symptoms between baseline (OFF medication) and 6-24 months follow-up (OFF medication and ON stimulation) was 1.64 for the MER group and 1.87 for non-MER group (p = 0.59). SMD in change in levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was 1.14 for the MER group and 0.65 for non-MER group (p < 0.01). Insufficient data were available for comparative analysis of PDQ-39 and complications. CONCLUSION: The change in motor symptoms from baseline to follow-up did not differ between studies that used MER and those that did not. The postoperative reduction in LEDD from baseline to follow-up was greater in the MER-group. In the absence of high-quality studies comparing both methods, there is a clear need for a well-designed comparative trial.

Gender Distribution in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: The Effect of Awake versus Asleep Surgery.

There is evidence that men are more likely to undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD), suggesting that women are relatively undertreated. 121 consecutive PD patients undergoing awake DBS with microelectrode recording and intraoperative clinical testing (30 patients, 5 women) or asleep MRI-guided and CT-verified (91 patients, 38 women) bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS were included in this study. The results showed an increase in the proportion of female patients from 16.7% to 41.8% after changing our operative technique (OR = 5.61; 95% CI: 1.52-20.78; p = 0.010) from awake to asleep, suggesting that women are more likely to undergo DBS when operated asleep.

The Role of Microelectrode Recording and Stereotactic Computed Tomography in Verifying Lead Placement During Awake MRI-Guided Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) has become a cornerstone in the advanced treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Despite its well-established clinical benefit, there is a significant variation in the way surgery is performed. Most centers operate with the patient awake to allow for microelectrode recording (MER) and intraoperative clinical testing. However, technical advances in MR imaging and MRI-guided surgery raise the question whether MER and intraoperative clinical testing still have added value in DBS-surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the added value of MER and intraoperative clinical testing to determine final lead position in awake MRI-guided and stereotactic CT-verified STN-DBS surgery for PD. METHODS: 29 consecutive patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients underwent awake bilateral STN-DBS with MER and intraoperative clinical testing. The role of MER and clinical testing in determining final lead position was evaluated. Furthermore, interobserver variability in determining the MRI-defined STN along the planned trajectory was investigated. Clinical improvement was evaluated at 12 months follow-up and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: 98% of final leads were placed in the central MER-track with an accuracy of 0.88±0.45 mm. Interobserver variability of the MRI-defined STN was 0.84±0.09. Compared to baseline, mean improvement in MDS-UPDRS-III, PDQ-39 and LEDD were 26.7±16.0 points (54%) (p < 0.001), 9.0±20.0 points (19%) (p = 0.025), and 794±434 mg/day (59%) (p < 0.001) respectively. There were 19 adverse events in 11 patients, one of which (lead malposition requiring immediate postoperative revision) was a serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: MER and intraoperative clinical testing had no additional value in determining final lead position. These results changed our daily clinical practice to an asleep MRI-guided and stereotactic CT-verified approach.