[Impact of omission of axillary dissection on adjuvant therapy in patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes according to the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria]. / Impact de l'omission du curage axillaire sur les traitements adjuvants chez les patientes ayant un ganglion sentinelle métastatique et répondant aux critères d'inclusion de l'ACOSOG Z0011.

OBJECTIVES: The results of the ACOSOG Z0011 questioned the usefulness of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in case of metastatic sentinel lymph node (SLN). The aim of our study was to assess the impact of the omission of ALND according to the inclusion criteria of the ACOSOG Z0011 study if SLN are metastatic but also the consequences on prescription of the application of a new standard of care for adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included, between November 2007 and January 2012, patients with T1-T2N0 breast cancer and metastatic SLN meeting the criteria for omission of completion ALND according to the study of the ACOSOG Z0011. Patients were submitted anonymously and randomly in multidisciplinary meeting (MM) 3 times: with complete information including ALND (MM1), with information from SLN alone (MM2) and with complete information of ALND according to the current protocols in 2013 (MM3). During each presentation, we collected the decision of the different adjuvant treatments proposed: chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiotherapy (with radiation fields). Then, we compared therapeutic proposals of the 3 presentations. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were eligible for inclusion criteria of the ACOSOG Z0011. Treatments actually proposed during MM1 consisted of 94.8 % of chemotherapy, 77.6 % of breast and lymph nodes radiotherapy and 91.4 % of hormone therapy. During the MM2, there was no significant difference compared to the decision taken during MM1. In fact, during MM2, we decided chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormonotherapy respectively in 89.7, 79.3 and 91.4 % of the cases. During the MM3, it was shown a significant decrease in the indications of chemotherapy (82.8 %, P=0.03) and lymph nodes irradiation (56.9 %, P=0.02) compared to the therapeutic proposals of the MM1. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The lack of information of ALND does not seem to significantly alter indications for adjuvant treatment. Otherwise, the evolution of our references causes a decrease in adjuvant therapy.

[Indication of radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer]. / Place de la radiothérapie après chimiothérapie première dans le cancer du sein.

Indications for adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer are defined from the clinical data and the pathological extent of disease in the surgical specimen. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could modify the pathological characteristics of the tumour, inducing a pathologic complete response in 15 to 50% of cases, challenging the classical indications of adjuvant radiotherapy. The benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not prospectively evaluated. Nonetheless, from retrospective series, some recommendations with a low level of proof could be given: (i) after lumpectomy, radiotherapy of the mammary gland must be performed even in case of pathologic complete response; (ii) after mastectomy, postoperative radiotherapy is recommended in case of cT3-T4, cN1-3 (clinical or radiological) or pathologically involved nodes; (iii) irradiation of the lymph nodes areas is more questionable, but could be also proposed in case of cN1 or pN1. These recommendations are in accordance with those recently published by the National Cancer Institute and the French National Cancer Institute.

[Role of locoregional radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes after preoperative chemotherapy and mastectomy. The Institut Curie-Hôpital René-Huguenin experience]. / Rôle de l'irradiation locorégionale adjuvante en l'absence d'envahissement ganglionnaire après chimiothérapie néoadjuvante, mastectomie totale et lymphadénectomie axillaire pour un cancer du sein. Expérience de l'hôpital René-Huguenin-institut Curie.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy generally induces significant changes in the pathological extent of disease and challenges the standard indications of adjuvant postmastectomy radiation therapy. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes (pN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Among 1054 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our institution between 1990 and 2004, 134 patients had pN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, metastatic sites, and treatments were prospectively recorded. The impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy on locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall survival was evaluated by multivariate analysis including known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 134 eligible patients, 78 patients (58.2%) received postmastectomy radiation therapy, and 56 patients (41.8%) did not. With a median follow-up time of 91.4 months, the 10-year locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were 96.2% and 77.2% with postmastectomy radiation therapy and 86.8% and 87.7% without radiation therapy, respectively (no significant difference). In multivariate analysis, there was a trend towards poorer overall survival among patients who did not have a pathologically complete primary tumour response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 6.65; 95% CI, 0.82-54.12; P=0.076). Postmastectomy radiation therapy had no effect on either locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.09-1.61; P=0.18) or overall survival (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 0.71-6; P=0.18). There was a trend towards poorer overall survival among patients who did not have pathologically complete in-breast tumour response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 6.65; 95% CI, 0.82-54.12; P=0.076). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study showed no increase in the risk of distant metastasis, locoregional recurrence or death when postmastectomy radiation therapy was omitted in breast cancer patients with pN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy. Whether the omission of postmastectomy radiation therapy is acceptable for these patients should be addressed prospectively.