Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Geospat Health ; 17(s1)2022 06 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35686992

ABSTRACT

This study aimed at detecting space-time clusters of COVID-19 cases in Fars Province, Iran and at investigating their potential association with meteorological factors, such as temperature, precipitation and wind velocity. Time-series data including 53,554 infected people recorded in 26 cities from 18 February to 30 September 2020 together with 5876 meteorological records were subjected to the analysis. Applying a significance level of P<0.05, the analysis of space-time distribution of COVID-19 resulted in nine significant outbreaks within the study period. The most likely cluster occurred from 27 March to 13 July 2020 and contained 11% of the total cases with eight additional, secondary clusters. We found that the COVID-19 incidence rate was affected by high temperature (OR=1.64; 95% CI: 1.44-1.87), while precipitation and wind velocity had less effect (OR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.75-0.89 and OR=0.27; 95% CI: 0.14-0.51), respectively.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Iran/epidemiology , Meteorological Concepts , Risk Factors
2.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol ; 2022: 4965411, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35677102

ABSTRACT

Background: Using time series and spatiotemporal analyses, this study aimed to establish an Early Warning System (EWS) for COVID-19 in Fars province Iran. Methods: A EWS was conducted on (i) daily basis city-level time series data including 53 554 cases recorded during 18 February-30 September 2020, which were applied to forecast COVID-19 cases during 1 October-14 November 2020, and (ii) the spatiotemporal analysis, which was conducted on the forecasted cases to predict spatiotemporal outbreaks of COVID-19. Results: A total of 55 369 cases were forecasted during 1 October-14 November 2020, most of which (26.9%) occurred in Shiraz. In addition, 65.80% and 34.20% of the cases occurred in October and November, respectively. Four significant spatiotemporal outbreaks were predicted, with the Most Likely Cluster (MLC) occurring in ten cities during 2-22 October (P < 0.001 for all). Moreover, subgroup analysis demonstrated that Zarrindasht was the canon of the epidemic on 6 October (P=0.04). As a part of EWS, the epidemic was triggered from Jahrom, involving the MLC districts in the center, west, and south parts of the province. Then, it showed a tendency to move towards Zarrindasht in the south and progress to Lar in the southernmost part. Afterwards, it simultaneously progressed to Fasa and Sepidan in the central and northwestern parts of the province, respectively. Conclusion: EWS, which was established based on the current protocol, alarmed policymakers and health managers on the progression of the epidemic and on where and when to implement medical facilities. These findings can be used to tailor province-level policies to servile the ongoing epidemic in the area; however, governmental level effort is needed to control the epidemic at a larger scale in the future.

3.
Respirology ; 27(9): 758-766, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35738778

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ivermectin is a known anti-parasitic agent that has been investigated as an antiviral agent against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ivermectin in mild COVID-19 patients. METHODS: In this multi-arm randomized clinical trial conducted between 9 April 2021 and 20 May 2021, a total of 393 patients with reverse transcription-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection and mild symptoms were enrolled. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive single-dose ivermectin (12 mg), double-dose ivermectin (24 mg) or placebo. The primary outcome was need for hospitalization. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of subjects who required hospitalization between the placebo and single-dose ivermectin groups (absolute difference in the proportions: -2.3 [95% CI = -8.5, 4.1]) and between the placebo and double-dose ivermectin groups (absolute difference in the proportions: -3.9 [95% CI = -9.8, 2.2]). The odds of differences in mean change in severity score between single-dose ivermectin and placebo groups (ORdifference  = 1.005 [95% CI: 0.972, 1.040]; p = 0.762) and double-dose ivermectin and placebo groups (ORdifference  = 1.010 [95% CI: 0.974, 1.046]; p = 0.598) were not statistically significant. None of the six adverse events (including mild dermatitis, tachycardia and hypertension) were serious and required extra action. CONCLUSION: Single-dose and double-dose ivermectin early treatment were not superior to the placebo in preventing progression to hospitalization and improving clinical course in mild COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Hospitalization , Humans , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
4.
Iran J Med Sci ; 47(3): 219-226, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35634523

ABSTRACT

Background: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has entered our lives with the fear of outbreak, death, and recurrence. Our objective in this study is to evaluate the epidemiological features of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and death in Fars province, Iran. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from February 18th to September 30th, 2020, where age, history of underlying diseases, sex, community-wide quarantine, nationality, close contact, pregnancy, medical staff job, traveling , and residency were compared between alive and deceased groups. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software, version 22.0, and the significance level was set at 0.05. Results: Regarding 57958 new cases of COVID-19, the basic reproduction number (R0) was estimated as 2.8, requiring a minimum of 65% immunization to reach herd immunity. Moreover, an R0=0.36 was required to reach the endemic state in the region. The incidence, mortality, fatality, and recurrence rates of COVID-19 were estimated as 1347.9 per 100,000 dwellers, 209.5 per 1000,000 dwellers, 1.6 %, and 3.1 per 100,000 dwellers, respectively. Age, history of underlying diseases, urban residency, and the male sex were significantly higher in the deceased group (OR=1.09, 5.48, 1.24, and 1.32; All Ps<0.001, <0.001, 0.005, and <0.001, respectively). In addition, the recurrence rate among positive cases was estimated as 0.23% with a median±inter-quartile range equal to 84±46.25 days. Community-wide quarantine was shown to be a protective factor for death due to COVID-19 (OR=0.58, P=0.005). Conclusion: Community-wide quarantine blocks the transmission of COVID-19 effectively. COVID-19 enjoys no solid immunity. History of underlying diseases, the male sex, urban residency, and age were among the most significant causes of death due to COVID-19. Further investigations are recommended on the genetic structure of SARS-CoV-2, treatments, and vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Male , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2
5.
J Family Reprod Health ; 14(3): 166-172, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33603808

ABSTRACT

Objective: we aimed to carry out an applied methodological tool, using Root-Cause Analysis (RCA), to determine the main causes of maternal mortality in Fars province, south of Iran, in 2014. Materials and methods: This is a case-series study and was conducted based on a careful examination of records and verbal autopsy with the family of the deceased person and their medical care team. Using RCA, quantitative dynamic modeling was done to display the overall impacts of different causes on maternal mortality. Finally, sensitivity analysis was done to determine the magnitude of contribution of each root-cause of maternal mortality. Results: Totally, all 10 maternal deaths with Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR) of 13.4 per 100.000 births, were recorded in the maternal surveillance system during 2014. The RCA results revealed that the root-causes of maternal mortality were ignorance and negligence (50%), delay in diagnosis (30%), delay in service provision in the first 24 hours after delivery (10%), and undesirable health care (10%). The results of sensitivity analysis in different scenarios revealed that medical negligence had the highest contribution to maternal mortality. Conclusion: Although maternal surveillance system stated some causes such as hemorrhage to be responsible for maternal deaths, the RCA showed that root-causes such as medical neglects had a fundamental role. Therefore, maternal mortality can be prevented by reforming the health care system and training all service providers, especially for high-risk mothers.

6.
J Family Reprod Health ; 13(1): 1-6, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31850091

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the trend of changes in Age-Specific Fertility Rate (ASFR), Total Fertility Rate (TFR), and Cohort Fertility Rate (CFR) in rural areas of Fars province, southern Iran during 1988-2012. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted based on analyze fluctuations in fertility. Information about the number of births and mothers aged 15-49 years was collected. By calculating the ASFR, TFR, and CFR along with analyzing their patterns the trend of changes in fertility rate would be revealed. Finally, modeling and time series forecast of ASFR based on age groups was conducted using the SPSS software. Results: The TFR was estimated to be 4.21, 2.1, 1.76, 1.65, and 1.78 per thousand in 1992, 1997, 2002, 2007, and 2012, respectively. Moreover, CFR was 2.01, 1.54, 1.05, 0.54, and 0.13 for those born during 1972-1976, 1977-1981, 1982-1986, 1987-1990, and 1991-1995, respectively. Also the time trend of ASFR based on age groups showed a negative slope. Conclusion: The fertility followed a negative slope during 1992-2012, indicating their descending trend during these years. TFR = 2.1 was a standard population replacement rate in the societies. Therefore, continual decline of this rate during 1992-2012 could be a warning factor that requires planning for reform and precise evaluation.

7.
Epidemiol Health ; 37: e2015031, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26212506

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The survival rate of thalassemia patients has not been conclusively established, and the factors associated with survival remain unclear. This study aimed to determine the survival rate of thalassemia among patients in southern Iran and to identify the factors associated with mortality from thalassemia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted based on a retrospective review of the medical records of 911 beta-thalassemia patients in 2014. Data analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 212 patients (23.3%) died, and 26.8% had thalassemia intermedia. The 20-year, 40-year, and 60-year survival rates were 85%, 63%, and 54%, respectively. Both crude and adjusted analyses found that education, marital status, ferritin levels, and comorbidities were related to mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic and hematological factors were found to be significantly associated with the survival rate of thalassemia. Addressing these factors may help healthcare providers and physicians to provide the best possible care and to improve the survival rate.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...