ABSTRACT
Objective: To report a case of monozygotic dichorionic (DC) twins after a single cryopreserved blastocyst embryo transfer followed by genetic determination of zygosity postpartum. Design: Case report. Setting: University hospital. Patients: A 26-year-old woman with polycystic ovary syndrome and her 36-year-old male partner with severe oligozoospermia, resulting in a 1.5-year history of primary infertility. Interventions: Controlled ovarian stimulation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment with single cryopreserved embryo transfer at blastocyst stage. Main Outcome Measures: Ultrasound images of the fetuses and short tandem repeat genotyping postpartum. Results: A DC twin pregnancy following a single cryopreserved blastocyst embryo transfer was confirmed at the first trimester screening. Confirmatory testing performed postpartum included short tandem repeat analysis determining monozygosity and pathology examination reporting DC placental configuration. Conclusions: Dichorionic monozygotic twins are thought to arise from the splitting of an embryo before the blastocyst stage. This case suggests that placental configuration of monozygotic twins may not strictly depend on timing of embryo division. Genetic analysis is the only tool to confirm the zygosity.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare the analgesic profile of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (RPCA) and combined spinal-epidural analgesia technique (CSEA) in multiparous women during the entire labour. We hypothesized that CSEA would provide a better and more sustained pain reduction than RPCA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational trial under ID NCT02963337 at a university hospital in Slovenia 2017-2018. Analgesic efficacy, satisfaction with pain-relief, adverse effects, labour progress, and outcomes between RPCA (80) and CSEA (81) were compared. RESULTS: CSEA provided significantly lower pain scores during the entire labour. Compared to baseline, significant pain reduction was recorded in both groups after 15 min. No difference was recorded compared to baseline with RPCA and CSEA after 45 and 90 mins, respectively. CSEA provided higher satisfaction than RPCA (5 [5-5] vs 5 [4-5], p < 0.0001). More patients with CSEA opted for the same technique for the next labour [CSEA; 77 (95%) vs RPCA; 65 (81%), p = 0.003]. No crossovers were observed. RPCA was associated with desaturation (34%), bradypnea (21%) and apnoea (25%), which were transitional and easily managed. None had severe sedation. No differences were recorded in labour progress and outcomes. Apgar scores were reassuring in all neonates (> 8). None had umbilical artery pH < 7.0. CONCLUSIONS: In multiparas, CSEA provided superior analgesia and satisfaction than RPCA. Nevertheless, RPCA provided a satisfactory experience, suggesting it could be used when neuraxial analgesia is not available, preferred, or contraindicated. In that case, constant presence of midwife is mandatory for management of clinically significant hypoventilation.
