Evaluation of the Analgesia Nociception Index and videopupillometry to predict post-tonsillectomy morphine requirements in children: a single-centre, prospective interventional study.

Background: Tonsil surgery causes significant and challenging postoperative pain. The Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and videopupillometry are two techniques of interest to monitor nociception in adults and may predict postoperative morphine requirements. We hypothesised that these techniques could predict the need for morphine after tonsillectomy in children. The main objective was to assess the prognostic significance of ANI and videopupillometry, measured at the end of surgery, on morphine consumption determined by a Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale score >3 in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Methods: A single-centre, prospective, interventional study evaluating children between 2 and 7 yr old undergoing tonsil surgery was performed. ANI and videopupillometry with tetanic stimulation were measured under general anaesthesia 4 min after the end of the surgical procedure. Each child was evaluated every 10 min by a nurse using the FLACC scale in the PACU and blinded to the measurements performed in the operating theatre. Results: Eighty-nine children were analysed and 39 (44%) received morphine in the PACU. Neither ANI values nor videopupillometry values were predictive of postoperative morphine consumption (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI; 0.42-0.65], and P=0.57; and 0.52, 95% CI [0.41-0.63], and P=0.69, respectively). Neither ANI values nor videopupillometry values were correlated to the maximum FLACC scale score in the PACU with ρ=0.04 (P=0.71) and ρ=0.06 (P=0.57), respectively. Conclusions: Neither ANI nor videopupillometry performed at the end of surgery can predict morphine consumption in the PACU in children undergoing tonsillectomy.

Pectoral I Block Does Not Improve Postoperative Analgesia After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Dual-Centered Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: General anesthesia for breast surgery may be supplemented by using a regional anesthetic technique. We evaluated the efficacy of the first pectoral nerve block (Pecs I) in treating postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, dual-centered, placebo-controlled trial was performed. One hundred twenty-eight patients scheduled for unilateral breast cancer surgery were recruited. A multimodal analgesic regimen and surgeon-administered local anesthetic infiltration were used for all patients. Ultrasound-guided Pecs I was performed using bupivacaine or saline. The primary outcome was the patient pain score (numerical rating scale [NRS]) in the recovery unit 30 minutes after admission or just before the morphine administration (NRS ≥4/10). The secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption (ie, in the recovery unit and after 24 hours). RESULTS: During recovery, no significant difference in NRS was observed between the bupivacaine (n = 62, 3.0 [1.0-4.0]) and placebo (n = 65, 3.0 [1.0-5.0]) groups (P = 0.55). However, the NRS was statistically significantly different, although not clinically significant, for patients undergoing major surgeries (mastectomies or tumorectomies with axillary clearance) (n = 29, 3.0 [0.0-4.0] vs 4.0 [2.0-5.0], P = 0.04). Morphine consumption during recovery did not differ (1.5 mg [0.0-6.0 mg] vs 3.0 mg [0.0-6.0 mg], P = 0.20), except in the major surgery subgroup (1.5 mg [0.0-6.0 mg] vs 6.0 mg [0.0-12.0 mg], P = 0.016). Intraoperative sufentanil and cumulative morphine consumption up to 24 hours did not differ between the 2 groups. Three patients experienced complications related to the Pecs I. CONCLUSIONS: Pecs I is not better than a saline placebo in the presence of multimodal analgesia for breast cancer surgery. However, its role in extended (major) breast surgery may warrant further investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01670448.

Basic critical care echocardiography: validation of a curriculum dedicated to noncardiologist residents.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a limited, tailored training program for noncardiologist residents without experience in ultrasound to reach competence in basic critical care echocardiography. DESIGN: Prospective descriptive clinical study. SETTING: Medical-surgical intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 201 patients (125 men; age: 61 ± 16 yrs; Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II: 37 ± 17; 145 ventilated patients) who required a transthoracic echocardiography were studied. INTERVENTION AND MEASUREMENTS: The curriculum consisted of a 12-hr learning program blending didactics, interactive clinical cases, and tutored hands-on sessions. After completion of this tailored training program, all eligible patients subsequently underwent a transthoracic echocardiography performed in random order by a recently trained resident and an experienced intensivist with expertise in critical care echocardiography who was used as a reference. The agreement between responses to clinical questions provided by the two investigators who independently interpreted the transthoracic echocardiography study at bedside was used as an indicator of effectiveness of the tested curriculum. MAIN RESULTS: Residents performed a mean of 33 transthoracic echocardiograms during the study period (range: 29-38). Experienced intensivists had significantly fewer unaddressed clinical questions than did residents (57 [5.7%] vs. 111 [11.0%] of 1,005 clinical questions: p < .0001). When compared to residents, the experienced intensivists performed shorter transthoracic echocardiography examinations (3.0 ± 1.0 min vs. 7.0 ± 2.5 min: p < .0001) with more acoustic windows (888 vs. 828 of 1,005 potential windows: p < .0001). Residents adequately assess global left ventricle systolic function (κ: 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.92). They accurately identified dilated left ventricle (κ: 0.90; 95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.0), dilated right ventricle (κ: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.89), dilated inferior vena cava (κ: 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.63-0.94), and pericardial effusion (κ: 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.99) and diagnosed two cases of tamponade. CONCLUSIONS: A 12-hr training program blending didactics, interactive clinical cases, and tutored hands-on sessions dedicated to noncardiologist residents without experience in ultrasound appears well suited for reaching competence in basic critical care echocardiography.