Cost-effectiveness of Bedaquiline for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis in the Republic of Korea.

PURPOSE: Bedaquiline is a new drug used for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding bedaquiline to a standard regimen (SR) for treating patients with MDR-TB, including extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-TB, in the Republic of Korea. METHODS: A cohort-based decision-analytic model developed in a previously published study from the United Kingdom was used, with a 20-year time horizon and a 5% discount rate for cost and effectiveness, to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of bedaquiline + SR and SR only. The key parameters regarding the clinical data were available via the published Phase II trial of bedaquiline. Additional parameters for recurrence, cure status, loss to follow-up, surgery, death, cost, and health utility were based on Korean data if available; otherwise the international literature data were applied. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. FINDINGS: Based on the analysis, a patient on bedaquiline + SR would gain 1.20 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at 13,961,659 Korean won (KRW) (1100 KRW = US $1) of additional cost compared with a patient administered SR only, with an incremental cost/utility ratio of 11,638,656 KRW/QALY. Bedaquiline + SR had an 80% probability of being cost-effective, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 26 million KRW, compared with SR only. IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study suggest that, in the Republic of Korea, bedaquiline, as a part of combination therapy with SR, is a cost-effective option for the treatment of MDR-TB (including XDR-TB) compared with SR only.

Treatment outcome and mortality among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in tuberculosis hospitals of the public sector.

This study was conducted to evaluate treatment outcome, mortality, and predictors of both in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) at 3 TB referral hospitals in the public sector of Korea. We included MDR-TB patients treated at 3 TB referral hospitals in 2004 and reviewed retrospectively their medical records and mortality data. Of 202 MDR-TB patients, 75 (37.1%) had treatment success and 127 (62.9%) poor outcomes. Default rate was high (37.1%, 75/202), comprising 59.1% of poor outcomes. Male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-7.49), positive smear at treatment initiation (aOR, 5.50; 95% CI, 1.22-24.90), and extensively drug-resistant TB (aOR, 10.72; 95% CI, 1.23-93.64) were independent predictors of poor outcome. The all-cause mortality rate was 31.2% (63/202) during the 3-4 yr after treatment initiation. In conclusion, the treatment outcomes of patients with MDR-TB at the 3 TB hospitals are poor, which may reflect the current status of MDR-TB in the public sector of Korea. A more comprehensive program against MDR-TB needs to be integrated into the National Tuberculosis Program of Korea.