Proton Beam Radiotherapy as a Curative Alternative to Radiofrequency Ablation for Newly Diagnosed Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 323 patients who underwent PBT (n=40) or RFA (n=283) as a curative treatment for previously untreated HCC between October 2016 and June 2021. The primary endpoints were local progression and toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 3.4 years (range=1.1-5.7 years). In terms of portal vein tumor thrombosis, tumor size, alpha-fetoprotein, and prothrombin-induced by vitamin K absence-II, the PBT group had significantly more severe tumor burdens than those of the RFA group (p<0.0001, p<0.0001, p=0.0004, and p<0.0001, respectively). No significant difference was observed in cumulative local progression rate (10.4% in PBT vs. 7.8% in RFA at 3-years, p=0.895). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported in only one patient (0.4%) after RFA. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that treatment modality was not a significant prognostic factor for local progression (hazard ratio=1.05; 95% confidence interval=0.32-3.48; p=0.934). CONCLUSION: PBT demonstrated comparable local control with acceptable toxicity to RFA in newly diagnosed HCC. Therefore, PBT may be a valid alternative.

Pulmonary function and toxicities of proton versus photon for limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the oncological outcomes and toxicities of definitive proton beam therapy (PBT) and photon beam therapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 262 patients with newly diagnosed LS-SCLC who underwent definitive PBT (n = 20; proton group) or photon beam therapy (n = 242; photon group) with concurrent chemotherapy between January 2016 and February 2021 and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), dose-volume parameters, and toxicities between the groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 24.5 months (range, 3.7 to 78.7). Baseline lung function was significantly worse and clinical target volume (CTV) was larger in the proton group (CTV: 296.6 vs. 215.3 mL; p = 0.080). The mean lung V10 was 37.7% ± 16.8% and 51.6% ± 24.5% in the proton and photon groups, respectively (p = 0.002). Two-year OS and PFS rates were 57.2% and 35.7% in the proton group and 65.3% and 40.8% in the photon group, respectively (p = 0.542 and 0.748, respectively). Grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis occurred in 5 (25.0%) and 7 (35.0%) PBT-treated patients and 66 (27.3%) and 40 (16.5%) photon beam therapy-treated patients, respectively (p = 0.826 and 0.062, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although the proton group had poorer lung function and a larger CTV than that in the photon group, both groups exhibited comparable treatment outcomes and radiation-related toxicities in LS-SCLC. PBT may be a valuable therapeutic modality in patients with poor pulmonary function or extensive disease burden owing to its lung-sparing ability.