Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Arch Osteoporos ; 17(1): 108, 2022 08 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35917039

ABSTRACT

This narrative review describes efforts to improve the care and prevention of fragility fractures in New Zealand from 2012 to 2022. This includes development of clinical standards and registries to benchmark provision of care, and public awareness campaigns to promote a life-course approach to bone health. PURPOSE: This review describes the development and implementation of a systematic approach to care and prevention for New Zealanders with fragility fractures, and those at high risk of first fracture. Progression of existing initiatives and introduction of new initiatives are proposed for the period 2022 to 2030. METHODS: In 2012, Osteoporosis New Zealand developed and published a strategy with objectives relating to people who sustain hip and other fragility fractures, those at high risk of first fragility fracture or falls and all older people. The strategy also advocated formation of a national fragility fracture alliance to expedite change. RESULTS: In 2017, a previously informal national alliance was formalised under the Live Stronger for Longer programme, which includes stakeholder organisations from relevant sectors, including government, healthcare professionals, charities and the health system. Outputs of this alliance include development of Australian and New Zealand clinical guidelines, clinical standards and quality indicators and a bi-national registry that underpins efforts to improve hip fracture care. All 22 hospitals in New Zealand that operate on hip fracture patients currently submit data to the registry. An analogous approach is ongoing to improve secondary fracture prevention for people who sustain fragility fractures at other sites through nationwide access to Fracture Liaison Services. CONCLUSION: Widespread participation in national registries is enabling benchmarking against clinical standards as a means to improve the care of hip and other fragility fractures in New Zealand. An ongoing quality improvement programme is focused on eliminating unwarranted variation in delivery of secondary fracture prevention.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Aged , Australia , Hip Fractures/prevention & control , Humans , New Zealand/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Secondary Prevention
2.
N Z Med J ; 135(1556): 73-80, 2022 06 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35728250

ABSTRACT

AIM: To describe the service delivery of the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) at Waitemata District Health Board (WDHB) for the year 2020, and to outline how the service evolved in recent years. METHOD: We reviewed and analysed the WDHB FLS database as well as 4-month and 12-month patient follow-up records from the calendar year 2020. RESULTS: In 2020, we identified and assessed 1,225 patients. We either directly initiated anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) (256), recommended to start AOM with patient's GP (477), or recommended to continue or switch to a different AOM (441) in the vast majority (1174 = 95.8%). In remaining 51 patients, AOM was either deemed unnecessary (owing to relatively young age and good DEXA indices) or patient refused it. Three hundred and thirty dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were arranged by FLS, and 79.5% were found to be either osteoporotic (32.9%) or osteopenic (46.6%). At 4-month and 12-month follow-up, 85.1% and 74.4%, respectively, of those expected to be on treatment were on treatment. CONCLUSION: The WDHB FLS has expanded and consolidated considerably in recent years. Nationwide implementation of effective FLSs should significantly reduce the burden of fragility fractures.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , New Zealand , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Secondary Prevention
4.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 12(4): 515-520, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33046409

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Frailty is a known risk factor for older patients with myeloma. Here we present realworld data using a computer-generated frailty assessment score (FRAIL score), based on 5 clinically derived parameters, in predicting patient outcomes. METHODS: Older patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who received frontline treatment with cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone had their FRAIL score retrospectively assessed. Treatment outcomes were assessed using standard IMWG criteria, and event free survival and overall survival determined. RESULTS: 155 patients were analysed. Compared to those who were assessed as non-frail (FRAIL score 0-1) likely-frail patients (score ≥ 2) were less likely to complete the full course of treatment (24.3% vs 53.4%, p = 0.002), and more likely to terminate treatment due to toxicities (35.1% vs 22.0%, p = 0.109), as well as having a greater number of patients stop treatment early for reasons other than toxicity or progression (27.0% vs 10.2%, p = 0.010). After a median follow up of 42.5 months, likely-frail patients were found to have a trend for shorter event-free survival (median EFS, 8.7 vs 17.9 months, p = 0.064) and statistically inferior overall survival (median OS, 30.2 vs 49.8 months, p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, stage, and Charlson comorbidity index, FRAIL score was prognostic for OS (HR = 3.47, 95% CI 1.88-6.4), but not EFS (HR = 1.28, 95%CI 0.79-2.06). CONCLUSION: The FRAIL score is independently predictive of overall survival in older patients with myeloma receiving bortezomib-based induction chemotherapy and can help identify those patients more likely to experience treatment toxicity.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Multiple Myeloma , Aged , Electronics , Frail Elderly , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
N Z Med J ; 132(1490): 17-25, 2019 02 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30789885

ABSTRACT

AIM: Mortality rates of up to 38% at one year have been reported following surgery for neck of femur fractures. The aim of this review is to evaluate the post-operative mortality rates and trends over time for patients with fractured neck of femur at Waitemata District Health Board. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study of all patients who received surgery following a neck of femur fracture at Waitemata District Health Board between 2009 and 2016. Inpatient data was retrieved from electronic hospital records and mortality rates from the Ministry of Health, New Zealand. Analyses included crude mortality rates and trends over time, and time-to-theatre from presentation with neck of femur fracture. RESULTS: A total of 2,822 patients were included in the study; mean age 81.9 years, 70.4% female and 29.6% male. Overall post-operative crude rates for inpatient, 30-day and one-year mortality were 3.7%, 7.2% and 23.8% respectively. Adjusted analyses showed a statistically significant decrease in mortality rates between 2009 and 2016 at inpatient (p=0.001), 30 days (p=<0.001) and one year (p=<0.001) time periods. There was also a significant association between time-to-theatre and mortality at inpatient (p=0.002), 30 days (p=0.0001), and one year (p=0.0002) time periods. CONCLUSION: Mortality rates following surgery for fractured NOF have significantly improved over recent years at Waitemata District Health Board. Reduced time-to-theatre is associated with decreased inpatient, 30-day and one-year mortality.


Subject(s)
Femoral Neck Fractures , Fracture Fixation , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost of Illness , Female , Femoral Neck Fractures/economics , Femoral Neck Fractures/epidemiology , Femoral Neck Fractures/mortality , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation/methods , Fracture Fixation/rehabilitation , Fracture Fixation/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , New Zealand/epidemiology , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Period , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...