Robotics in cardiac surgery.

A summary of its uses in mitral valve surgery and coronary artery revascularisation.

Does off-pump coronary revascularization reduce mortality in re-operative coronary artery surgery? A meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Re-operative coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a challenging operation that is often performed in a high-risk patient group. Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in these patients is hypothesised to be advantageous due to the reduced invasiveness and physiological stress of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). The aims of this study were to assess whether OPCAB may improve outcomes in patients undergoing re-operative CABG. METHODS: Twelve studies, incorporating 3471 patients, were identified by systematic literature review. These were meta-analysed using random-effects modelling. Primary endpoints were 30-day and mid-term mortality. Secondary endpoints were completeness of revascularization, mean number of grafts per patient and the effect of intra-operative conversion on mortality. RESULTS: A significantly lower rate of 30-day mortality was observed with OPCAB (OR 0.51, 95% CI [0.35, 0.74]), however, no difference was demonstrated in mid-term mortality. Significantly less complete revascularization and mean number of grafts per patient were observed in the OPCAB group. Meta-regression revealed no change in 30-day mortality when the effect of conversion from one technique to the other was assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump techniques may reduce early mortality in selected patients undergoing re-operative CABG; however, this does not persist into mid-term follow-up. OPCAB may also lead to intra-operative conversion and, although this did not affect outcomes in this study, these results are constrained by the limited data available. Furthermore, OPCAB may increase target vessel revascularization and, consequently, incomplete revascularization which, whilst not reflected in the short-term outcomes, requires longer-term follow-up in order to be fully assessed.

Management of the left subclavian artery during endovascular stent grafting for traumatic aortic injury - a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: Traumatic thoracic aortic injuries are serious and may be associated with high morbidity and mortality. Endovascular stent grafting is now an established treatment option which often requires proximal landing zone extension through left subclavian artery (LSA) origin coverage. This in turn can lead to downstream ischaemic complications which may be lessened by LSA revascularisation. This study investigates the consequence of LSA coverage and potential benefit of revascularisation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic literature review of studies between 1997 and 2010 identified 94 studies incorporating 1704 patients. Chronological trends in LSA management practice for trauma were sought. Designated outcomes of interest were prevalences of left arm ischaemia, stroke, spinal cord ischaemia, endoleak, stent migration, need for additional procedure and mortality. These outcomes were compared in patients with and without LSA coverage (taking account of the degree of coverage). The impact of revascularisation on these outcomes was also explored. Statistical analysis included examination with Chi-Square or Fisher's tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Isolated total LSA coverage without revascularisation increases the prevalence of left arm ischaemia [prevalence of 4.06% versus 0.0% (p < 0.001)]; stroke [prevalence of 1.19% versus 0.23% (p = 0.025)]; and need for additional procedure [prevalence of 2.86% versus 0.86% (p = 0.004). In contrast there were no reported cases of stroke, spinal cord ischaemia, endoleak, stent migration or mortality when the LSA origin was only partially covered. When the LSA territory was revascularised, again no cases of left arm ischaemia, stroke, spinal cord ischaemia, endoleak, or mortality were reported. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that LSA coverage in patients undergoing endovascular stent grafting of the thoracic aorta for trauma should be avoided where possible to avoid ensuing downstream ischaemic complications. When coverage is anatomically necessary, partial coverage is better than complete in terms of avoiding these complications and revascularisation may be considered, however these decisions must be made in the context of the individual patient scenario.