Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiac arrest?: rapid-response extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-arrest percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be useful in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, little is known about the combination of ECMO and intra-arrest PCI. This study investigated the efficacy of rapid-response ECMO and intra-arrest PCI in patients with cardiac arrest complicated by acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter cohort study was conducted with the use of the database of ECMO in Hiroshima City, Japan. Between January 2004 and May 2011, rapid-response ECMO was performed in 86 patients with acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional CPR. The median age of the study patients was 63 years, and 81% were male. Emergency coronary angiography was performed in 81 patients (94%), and intra-arrest PCI was performed in 61 patients (71%). The rates of return of spontaneous heartbeat, 30-day survival, and favorable neurological outcomes were 88%, 29%, and 24%, respectively. All of the patients who received intra-arrest PCI achieved return of spontaneous heartbeat. In patients who survived up to day 30, the rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was lower (58% versus 28%; P=0.01), the intra-arrest PCI was higher (88% versus 70%; P=0.04), and the time interval from collapse to the initiation of ECMO was shorter (40 [25-51] versus 54 minutes [34-74 minutes]; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid-response ECMO plus intra-arrest PCI is feasible and associated with improved outcomes in patients who are unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On the basis of these findings, randomized studies of intra-arrest PCI are needed.

[Transluminal placed endovascular graft (TPEG) for thoracic aortic disease in fifteen patients under general anesthesia].

In 15 transluminal placed endovascular graft (TPEG) operations for thoracic aortic aneurysm either from dissection or injury, we induced general anesthesia with propofol, and maintained with propofol or sevoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen. The temporary balloon occlusion technique used for prevention of stent migration caused hypotension (systolic pressure 30-60 mmHg) in all cases. After releasing the occluding balloon, blood pressure in each patient recovered to the prehypotension level without use of catecholamine. We experienced two emergency operations, a thoracotomy and a celiotomy, resulting from graft failure. We had sudden hypotension in two other cases. In the first patient with aortic regurgitation, coronary air embolism was suspected because of ST segment elevation, while in the other, the hypotension was due to unexpected bleeding from the femoral artery sheath. Two additional patients developed vascular injuries occurring during manipulation of the catheter or sheath. In order to manage anesthesia for TPEG, it is necessary to be aware of its complications.