Strokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks Occurrence During Annual Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of stroke/TIA during annual dual antiplatelet therapy (ADAPT) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains high. Some evidence suggests that shorter than ADAPT may diminish such risk, still providing adequate vascular protection. However, the precise timing of strokes/TIA occurrences during ADAPT is unclear but may be important for determining optimal preventive treatment duration. STUDY QUESTION: The precise timing of secondary cerebrovascular events over ADAPT. STUDY DESIGN: Access was gained to the FDA-issued Platelet Inhibition and Outcomes (PLATO) trial data set on which post hoc analyses of stroke/TIA timing after ticagrelor and clopidogrel on top of aspirin was explored. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Events were counted and plotted over time from day 1 till day 365 after the index ACS event. RESULTS: Among 18,624 enrollees, 252 strokes and 49 TIAs were reported. After the exclusion of entries with missing dates, unclear randomization codes, and events beyond 1-year follow-up, 238 strokes and 45 TIAs were analyzed. Overall, most frequent strokes/TIAs occurred within the first day after qualifying ACS, with the gradual declines after day 7 and day 40 reaching background counts thereafter. The strokes/TIAs patterns did not differ much between P 2 Y12 inhibitors except for twice more events at day 1 and excess exclusions after day 365 in the ticagrelor arm. CONCLUSIONS: Most cerebrovascular events emerged very early after ACS despite ADAPT. This large hypothesis-generating evidence may justify shorter than the ADAPT duration after ACS. Twice more events at day 1 and excess late ticagrelor exclusions in PLATO deserve further scrutiny. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT00391872.

Time Course of Death After Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for 1 Year.

BACKGROUND: Excess mortality remains the cornerstone concern despite dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after acute coronary syndrome. Some data suggest that shorter periods than 12 months of DAPT diminish bleeding risks yet still provide adequate vascular protection and improving survival. However, the precise timing of deaths after acute coronary syndrome has not been mapped in many studies. This knowledge may be critical for defining optimal treatment duration. METHODS: Access was gained to the data set for the Platelet Inhibition and Outcomes (PLATO) trial, which was issued by the Food and Drug Administration, in which post hoc analyses of timing of death events during DAPT (with either aspirin/ticagrelor or aspirin/clopidogrel) were performed. All-cause individual deaths were counted and plotted over time from day 1 to day 365 after the index event. RESULTS: Among 18,624 enrollees, 938 total deaths were reported to the Food and Drug Administration in PLATO. After exclusion of deceased patients with missing dates, randomization errors, and deaths beyond 1 year of follow-up, 913 fatalities (509 after clopidogrel and 404 after ticagrelor) were analyzed. The PLATO records did not indicate where exactly deaths occurred making impossible to triage in the hospital versus outpatient fatalities. Most frequent deaths occurred within the Day 1 (n = 41); Day 2 (n = 48); and Day 3 (n = 33) and overall during the first week (n = 202; 22.1%) after the index acute coronary syndrome, with a gradual decline after Day 10 and Day 60, reaching background counts after Day 220. CONCLUSION: Focusing on mortality reduction, this large data set may support a shorter than 12 months' duration of DAPT.

Impact of Bleeding on Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, and Death During 12 Months Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding remains a complication during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Some data suggest a link between bleeding and worsened vascular outcomes. However, this association is unclear, due to omitting of minor bleedings when applying conservative scales. In contrast, the Platelet Inhibition and Outcomes (PLATO) trial classification used broad realistic capturing of all bleedings. METHODS: Access was gained to the Food and Drug Administration-issued adjudication data set on which post hoc analyses of bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and death were conducted. Bleeding was defined as minimal, minor, major, and life-threatening or fatal (LTOF) as per the original PLATO scale. RESULTS: Among 18,624 enrollees, 10,705 adjudicated events occurred across 7171 patients. There were 618 minimal, 1412 minor, 1216 major, and 536 LTOF bleedings for the total of 3782 events reported in 3387 patients. There were 938 deaths, 2751 MIs and 359 strokes. The overall bleeding was 20.3%, exhibited in 19.2% patients. Total bleeds were associated with less deaths (odds ratio [OR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-0.63) and MI (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.41-0.54; P < .001 for both). There were no differences in deaths (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.93-1.34; P = .24), but less MIs (OR: 0.72. 95% CI: 0.59-0.86; P < .001), and more strokes (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.64-2.88; P < .001) after LTOF. Major, minor, and minimal bleeds were associated with less deaths and MI but not strokes. CONCLUSION: These large uniformly adjudicated data reveal that within 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy, 1 out of 5 patients experiences bleeding. Overall, bleeding was associated with diminished incidence of death and MI but not strokes.

The FDA and PLATO Investigators death lists: Call for a match.

PURPOSE: The FDA-issued PLATO trial dataset revealed that some primary death causes (PDCs) were inaccurately reported favouring ticagrelor. However, the PLATO Investigators operated the shorter death list of uncertain quality. We compared if PDC match when trial fatalities were reported to the FDA and by the PLATO Investigators. METHOD: The FDA list contains precisely detailed 938 PLATO deaths, while shorter investigators dataset consists of 905 deaths. We matched four vascular (sudden, post-MI, heart failure and stroke), and three non-vascular (cancer, sepsis and suicide) PDC between death lists. RESULTS: There were more sudden deaths in the shorter list than in the FDA dataset (161 vs 138; P < .03) and post-AMI (373 vs 178; P < .001) but fewer heart failure deaths (73 vs 109; P = .02). Stroke numbers match well (39 vs 37; P = NS) with only two ticagrelor cases removed. Cancer matched well (32 vs 31; P = NS), and sepsis cases were identical (30 vs 30; P = NS). However, two extra clopidogrel suicides in the shorter list are impossible to comprehend. CONCLUSIONS: The PLATO trial PDCs were mismatched between FDA and investigators sets. We are kindly asking the ticagrelor sponsor or/and concerned PLATO Investigators to clarify the PDC dataset match.

All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes With Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Heart Failure in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with heart failure (HF) are treated with warfarin or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Randomized outcome-driven comparisons of different anticoagulant strategies in HF are lacking. Data from international, government-mandated registries may be useful in understanding the real-life use of various anticoagulants and how they are linked to outcomes. STUDY QUESTION: To assess 2015 annual all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke rates co-reported for warfarin and NOACs in subjects with and without HF in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. STUDY DESIGN: We extracted and examined outcome cases in subjects with HF and on warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban and stratified these according to anticoagulants. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Annual all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke in FAERS. ANALYSIS METHOD: Odds ratio (OR) and χ(Equation is included in full-text article.)for oral anticoagulants from FAERS with and without HF among complete primary reports issued in 2015. RESULTS: FAERS reported 137,026 HF cases, with death co-reported in 42,942 (31.3%). In total, 11,278 (8.2%) HF patients were treated with anticoagulants, with more prescribed warfarin (n = 8260) than all NOACs combined (n = 3018). Very few reports for edoxaban were available. Warfarin consistently displayed a signal for excess adverse events compared to NOACs: OR (95% confidence interval) for the composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke were 1.91 (1.76-2.07) versus apixaban, 1.92 (1.81-2.03) versus dabigatran, 4.09 (3.38-4.37) versus rivaroxaban, and 2.64 (2.53-2.76) versus all NOACs combined (all P < 0.001). Warfarin, compared to all NOACs combined, demonstrated higher rates of all-cause mortality [OR = 2.69 (95% confidence interval, 2.49-2.90)], myocardial infarction [5.30 (4.17-6.74)], stroke [OR = 8.85 (6.61-11.84)], and ischemic stroke [OR = 12.73 (8.87-18.27); all P < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Annual 2015 FAERS profiles in HF patients reveal that warfarin was numerically dominant. Warfarin was associated with higher risk of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke compared to NOACs. These observational data provide real-world insight into a potential safety benefit of NOACs over warfarin in the setting of HF.

Mortality and adverse events with brand and generic clopidogrel in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

AIMS: Clopidogrel is commonly used even after expiring patents. The brand clopidogrel (BC) was dealt by single company, while numerous manufacturers produce generic clopidogrel (GC). There are no convincing data to compare the safety of different formulations. Therefore, the data yielded from international, uniform, government-mandated registries may be useful. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed primary causative adverse events (PCAE) after BC and GC in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The outcomes were divided into death, cardiac, thrombotic/embolic, haemorrhagic, and rash/dermal complications. These primary endpoints were then examined by proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and chi-square (χ2). Among total FAERS (n = 9 466 679) reports, overall BC (n = 88 863) cases were more common than after GC (n = 36 559). When triaged by PCAE role, BC (n = 18 328) was also more abundant than GC (n = 3987). The reported death rates were more than doubled after BC [18.4% vs. 7.0%; PRR = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.32-0.43; χ2=369.7; P<0.0001] for total FAERS, and consistent for late 2010-2017 (17.6% vs. 7.0% PRR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.37-0.45; χ2=286.2; P<0.004) PCAE cases. In contrast, GC trended to co-report more cardiac (14.6% vs. 13.3%; PRR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.0-1.25; χ2=3.5; P<0.06). The haemorrhagic (40.9% vs. 32.3%; PRR = 1.45; 95% CI 1.33-1.57; χ2=75.8; P<0.0001), and rash/dermal (5.4% vs. 4.6%; PRR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.0-1.44; χ2=3.75; P<0.05) events were also more common for GC. Thrombotic/embolic events were reported equally (at 7.0%) after each formulation. CONCLUSION: The PCAE profiles differ with BC and GC in FAERS. While deaths reports were higher, the rates of cardiac, haemorrhagic, and skin complications were less common for BC. Despite expected reporting bias, this may indicate that the manufacturers of GC are reluctant to report deaths to the FDA. However, the overall adverse event profile suggests potentially better safety of BC over GC formulations.

Body Mass Index and Plasma P-Selectin before Coronary Stenting Predict High Residual Platelet Reactivity at 6 Months on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

BACKGROUND: High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may impact clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, whether any biomarkers assessed before PCI at DAPT loading may predict delayed maintenance HRPR is not clear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether conventional clinical or laboratory indices at loading before stenting may predict HRPR at 6 months of maintenance DAPT. METHODS: The study was designed on a single-center prospective cohort, and included 94 pre-PCI patients. All patients underwent elective PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation, and received DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel. Platelet reactivity was assessed with 5 µmol/L of adenosine diphosphate-induced light transmission aggregometry before PCI, but after 24 h of DAPT loading, and repeated at 6 months. Baseline clinical characteristics, CYP2C19 polymorphism, C-reactive protein, soluble P-selectin, CD40L, interleukin-6, PAI-1 levels, and von Willebrand factor activity were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence (light transmission aggregometry <50%) of prestent HRPR was 16%. By univariate regression, body mass index (BMI; p = 0.02), total cholesterol (p = 0.01), low-density lipoproteins (p = 0.004), CYP2C19*2 allele carriage (p = 0.006), soluble P-selectin (p = 0.009), and von Willebrand factor (p = 0.04) were linked to future HRPR. However, multivariate regression analysis suggested that only BMI and P-selectin were independent predictors of HRPR. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet reactivity before elective stenting is associated with numerous biomarkers; however, only BMI and soluble P-selectin were independent predictors of future HRPR during maintenance-phase DAPT. This may be important for future tailored antiplatelet strategies in patients with metabolic syndrome and diabetics.

Filing Sources after Oral P2Y12 Platelet Inhibitors to the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

BACKGROUND: The US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) is a global passive surveillance database that relies on voluntary reporting by health care professionals and consumers as well as required mandatory reporting by pharmaceutical manufacturers. However, the initial filers and comparative patterns for oral P2Y12 platelet inhibitor reporting are unknown. We assessed who generated original FAERS reports for clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor in 2015. METHODS: From the FAERS database we extracted and examined adverse event cases coreported with oral P2Y12 platelet inhibitors. All adverse event filing originating sources were dichotomized into consumers, lawyers, pharmacists, physicians, other health care professionals, and unknown. RESULTS: Overall, 2015 annual adverse events were more commonly coreported with clopidogrel (n = 13,234) with known source filers (n = 12,818, or 96.9%) than with prasugrel (2,896; 98.9% out of 2,927 cases) or ticagrelor (2,163, or 82.3%, out of 2,627 cases, respectively). Overall, most adverse events were filed by consumers (8,336, or 44.4%), followed by physicians (5,290, or 28.2%), other health care professionals (2,997, or 16.0%), pharmacists (1,125, or 6.0%), and finally by lawyers (129, or 0.7%). The origin of 811 (4.7%) initial reports remains unknown. The adverse event filing sources differ among drugs. While adverse events coreported with clopidogrel and prasugrel were commonly originated by patients (40.4 and 84.3%, respectively), most frequently ticagrelor reports (42.5%) were filed by physicians. CONCLUSION: The reporting quality and initial sources differ among oral P2Y12 platelet inhibitors in FAERS. The ticagrelor surveillance in 2015 was inadequate when compared to clopidogrel and prasugrel. Patients filed most adverse events for clopidogrel and prasugrel, while physicians originated most ticagrelor complaints. These differences justify stricter compliance control for ticagrelor manufacturers and may be attributed to the confusion of treating physicians with unexpected fatal, cardiac, and thrombotic adverse events linked to ticagrelor.

Incidence and Causes for Early Ticagrelor Discontinuation: A "Real-World" Dutch Registry Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The PLATO trial revealed superiority of ticagrelor over clopidogrel for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, adverse events such as bleeding, dyspnea, and bradycardia were frequently reported, potentially leading to excess early ticagrelor discontinuation (ETD), later confirmed in the PEGASUS trial. We here evaluated the incidence and causes for ETD in a real-world patient cohort in a high-volume nonacademic percutaneous coronary intervention center in the Netherlands. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center registry, all patients discharged from the hospital with a new ticagrelor prescription were screened for ETD. Follow-up data were obtained using the hospital electronic patient file records and confirmed by telephone contact with the patient and/or general practitioner, if necessary, to complement the data. RESULTS: Ticagrelor was prescribed in 354 patients between December 2011 and December 2012. The follow-up data were available in 301 patients with a mean follow-up duration of 330 days. ETD or switching to another antiplatelet agent occurred in 73 patients (24.3%), mostly due to dyspnea (11.6%), bleeding (3.7%), or planned major surgery (2.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Almost one quarter of ticagrelor patients were discontinued prematurely or switched to another antiplatelet agent within 1 year, mostly due to dyspnea or bleeding.

Vorapaxar and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Coincidence or Adverse Association?

BACKGROUND: Vorapaxar, a novel antiplatelet thrombin PAR-1 inhibitor, is currently approved for post myocardial infarction and peripheral artery disease indications with concomitant use of clopidogrel and/or aspirin. The vorapaxar safety profile was acceptable. However, aside from heightened bleeding risks, excesses of solid cancers and diplopia, there were more amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) diagnoses after vorapaxar. STUDY QUESTION: To assess the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews on the potential association of vorapaxar with ALS. STUDY DESIGN: The review the public FDA records on reported adverse events after vorapaxar. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Incidence of ALS after vorapaxar and placebo. RESULTS: The ALS risk appears very small, about 1 case per 10,000 treated subjects, but quite probable. Indeed, there were overall 2 placebo and 4 vorapaxar ALS incidences in the Phase III clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Potential adverse association of vorapaxar with ALS risks may be related to off-target neuronal PAR receptor(s) blockade beyond platelet inhibition.

Mortality and cancer after 12 versus 30 months dual antiplatelet therapy. The Korean Outcomes Registry Evaluating Antithrombotics (KOREA).

The optimal duration and cancer risks of antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are unclear. We compared cancer and all-cause mortality after dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin (ASA) versus ASA alone over 18 months follow-up in event-free patients at 12 months DAPT from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) dataset via the Korean Outcomes Registry Evaluating Antithrombotics (KOREA). We selected PCI patients who were event free for 12 months and maintained a consistent antiplatelet regimen for 18 more months. The primary endpoints were any cancer and all-cause mortality at 30 months follow-up after PCI. From 320,351 screened post-PCI patient HIRA records, we excluded 294,413 and qualified 25,938, constituting DAPT (n=10,992) and ASA (n=14,946) groups. The Propensity Score Matching (PSM), and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) revealed no significant differences in background demographics and clinical characteristics for DAPT versus ASA patients. At 30-months post-PCI, after massive (>91 %) exclusions, cancer risk was higher for continuous DAPT [455 (4.15 %) vs 606 (4.04 %); HR=1.221; 95 %CI: 1.061-1.405; p=0.005], which remained significant by PSM (p=0.006) or IPTW (p=0.007), while all-cause mortality was similar [136 (1.24 %) vs 192 (1.28 %) HR=0.999; 95 %CI: 0.736-1.135; p=0.993]. This analysis suggests a potential mild excess cancer risk, but no mortality benefit in Korean post-PCI patients treated with DAPT for an additional 18 months beyond conventional 12 months DAPT. These data are not supporting continuing DAPT for more than one year in East Asians. Analysing cancer types and assessing potential cancer association with bleeding are warranted.

Predicting Successful Recanalization in Patients with Native Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: The Busan CTO Score.

BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy to manage chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains unclear. The Japanese CTO multicenter registry (J-CTO) score is an established tool for predicting successful recanalization. However, it does not take into account nonangiographic predictors for final technique success. In the present study, we designed and tested a scoring model called the Busan single-center CTO registry (B-CTO) score combining clinical and angiographic characteristics to predict successful CTO recanalization in Korean patients. METHODS: Prospectively enrolled CTO patients (n = 438) undergoing coronary intervention (1999-2015) were assessed. The B-CTO score comprises 6 independent predictors: age 60-74 years and lesion length ≥20 mm were assigned 1 point each, while age ≥75 years, female gender, lesion location in the right coronary artery, blunt stump, and bending >45° were assigned 2 points each. For each predictor, the points assigned were based on the associated odds ratio by multivariate analysis. The lesions were classified into 4 groups according to the summation of points scored to assess the probability of successful CTO recanalization: easy (score 0-1), intermediate (score 2-3), difficult (score 4-5), and very difficult (score ≥6). CTO opening was designated as the primary endpoint regardless of the interventional era or the skill of the operator. RESULTS: The final success rate for B-CTO was 81.1%. The probability of successful recanalization for patient groups classified as easy (n = 64), intermediate (n = 148), difficult (n = 134), and very difficult (n = 92) was 95.3, 86.5, 79.1 and 65.2%, respectively (p for trend <0.001). When compared to the J-CTO, the B-CTO score demonstrated a significant improvement in discrimination as indicated by the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC 0.083; 95% CI 0.025-0.141), with a positive integrated discrimination improvement of 0.042 and a net reclassification improvement of 56.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The B-CTO score has been designed and validated in Korean patients with native coronary CTO and is an improved tool for predicting successful recanalization. Wider application of the B-CTO score remains to be explored.