Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 124(2): 181-6, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17309875

ABSTRACT

A study has been carried out to propose diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for lateral cephalometric radiology in Germany based on the dose-area product (DAP). DRLs were proposed separately for child and adult exposure settings which are 26.4 and 32.6 mGy cm2, respectively. Organ absorbed doses from lateral cephalometric radiology were also measured using thermoluminescence detectors (TLDs) and an adult anthropomorphic phantom specially design for dosimetric study in dental radiology. Effective doses were then calculated using three different techniques where the salivary gland and brain tissue were given different weighting factors. Conversion coefficients for estimating effective dose from DAP value derived in this study range from 0.042 to 0.149 microSv/mGy cm2.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Cephalometry/methods , Radiography, Dental/methods , Radiometry/methods , Body Burden , Computer Simulation , Germany , Humans , Models, Biological , Radiation Dosage , Relative Biological Effectiveness
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 123(1): 131-4, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16905759

ABSTRACT

In this study, dose-area product (DAP) measurements in panoramic dental radiology have been performed in Germany. The results obtained in this study were proposed as diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). A representative number of dental panoramic units, both with digital and conventional image receptors, have been chosen. Common statistical parameters such as mean, standard deviation and 3rd quartile have been calculated. For four different standard programmes, 'large adult', 'adult male', 'adult female' and 'child', the proposed DRLs are 101, 87, 84 and 75 mGy cm(2), respectively. No clear tendency to a generalised dose reduction from the transition to digital techniques has been observed. Effective doses have been calculated from E/DAP conversion factors published in literature. Even though these values differ by a factor of approximately 3, upper limits of 15.8-21.2 microSv for the four different exposure settings were derived from the data.


Subject(s)
Radiation Monitoring , Radiography, Panoramic , Radiology , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Biological , Radiation Dosage , Risk Assessment
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 123(2): 262-7, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16971397

ABSTRACT

In this study, dose area product measurements have been performed to propose diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in intraoral dental radiology. Measurements were carried out at 60 X-ray units for all types of intraoral examinations performed in clinical routine. The third quartile values calculated range from 26.2 to 87.0 mGy cm(2). The results showed that there exists a large difference between the patient exposures among different dental facilities. It was also observed that dentists working with faster film type or higher tube voltage are not always associated with lower exposure. The study demonstrated the necessity to have the DRLs laid out as guidelines in dental radiology.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/analysis , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Body Burden , Humans , X-Rays
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 121(4): 461-5, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16782982

ABSTRACT

In this study, dose area product (DAP) measurements have been performed aiming at establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in paediatric intraoral dental radiology. Measurements were carried out at 52 X-ray units for all types of intraoral examinations performed in clinical routine. Not all X-ray units have pre-set child exposure settings with reduced exposure time or in some cases lower tube voltage. Child examinations are carried out using adult exposure settings at these units, which increases the DAP third quartile values by up to 50%. For example, third quartile values for periapical examination ranges from 14.4 to 40.9 mGy cm(2) for child settings and 20.6 to 48.8 mGy cm(2) when the adult settings are included. The results show that there exists a large difference between the patient exposures among different dental facilities. It was also observed that clinics working with faster film type or higher tube voltage are not always associated with lower exposure.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/analysis , Radiation Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/methods , Body Burden , Child , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Radiation Dosage , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Risk Factors , X-Rays
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...