Relation of symptoms to impaired stomach, small bowel, and colon motility in long-standing diabetes.

Stomach, intestinal, and colonic transit were measured in males with insulin-requiring diabetes of greater than 10 years' duration to compare with symptoms and to estimate the medical significance. For all diabetics only the symptom constipation correlated with the appropriate regional delayed transit. Diabetics with delayed transit in any region, however, had more overall gastrointestinal symptoms. Diabetics with delayed transit had disease of significantly longer duration than those without delay. Delayed transit was common in the diabetics selected for study with 21 of 54 stomachs, 10 of 20 small intestines, and 14 of 20 colons showing impairment. Of 35 diabetics with impaired transit at one or more locations, only seven were judged of medical importance and five of these responded to treatment. In this study, delayed transit was frequent; in the one fifth requiring management, the symptoms related closely to the region impaired.

The importance of hiatal hernia in reflux esophagitis compared with lower esophageal sphincter pressure or smoking.

The characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease have not been adequately defined. To determine the influence on the esophageal mucosa of hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, acid reflux, and cigarettes and alcohol, we studied the reflux parameters, smoking habits, and alcohol consumption of 184 healthy, ambulatory outpatients who received endoscopy as the initial diagnostic procedure for workup of gastroesophageal reflux. Patients received endoscopic and histologic evaluations of the esophageal mucosa, prolonged ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, and esophageal manometric determinations. Structural analysis was used to test the plausibility of various clinical theories concerning the most important factors contributing to the development of esophagitis. Statistical analyses revealed the following: (a) the lower esophageal sphincter pressure, acid contact time, and frequency of reflux episodes were highly associated with the presence of a hiatal hernia (p less than 0.003 for all parameters); (b) individuals with esophagitis had 16.5 times as many hiatal hernias as found in normal, healthy people; (c) cigarette smoking was not correlated with esophagitis but was significantly associated with increased lower esophageal sphincter pressure (r = 0.18; p less than 0.03); and (d) smoking was also not associated with increased acid contact time or increased frequency of reflux episodes. We conclude that (a) the presence of a hiatal hernia, not the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter, is the most important predictor of reflux frequency, acid contact time, and esophagitis; (b) a decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure, as suggested by structural analysis, is unlikely to be the cause of increased reflux episodes or esophagitis; and (c) if smoking and lower esophageal sphincter pressure are factors in the development of esophagitis, they damage the esophageal mucosa by mechanisms other than increased frequency of reflux episodes or increased acid contact time.

Most asthmatics have gastroesophageal reflux with or without bronchodilator therapy.

The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and asthma has not been clearly defined. We measured the lower esophageal sphincter pressures and studied gastroesophageal reflux patterns over 24 hours using an ambulatory Gastroreflux Recorder (Del Mar Avionics, Irvine, CA) in 44 controls and 104 consecutive adult asthmatics. The presence or absence of reflux symptoms was not used as a selection criterion for asthmatics. All asthmatics had discrete episodes of diffuse wheezing and documented reversible airway obstruction of at least 20%. Patients underwent reflux testing while receiving, if any, their usual asthmatic medications: 71.2% required chronic bronchodilators and 28.8% required no bronchodilators. Compared with controls, asthmatics had significantly decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressures, greater esophageal acid exposure times, more frequent reflux episodes, and longer clearance times in both the upright and supine positions (P less than 0.0001 for all parameters tested). There were no differences in any of the measured reflux parameters between asthmatics who required bronchodilators and those who did not. Thus, the decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressures and increased levels of acid reflux in asthmatics were not entirely caused by the effects of bronchodilator therapy. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis generated reflux values that discriminated asthmatics from controls. More than 80% of adult asthmatics have abnormal gastroesophageal reflux. We conclude that most adult asthmatics, regardless of the use of bronchodilator therapy, have abnormal gastroesophageal reflux manifested by increased reflux frequency, delayed acid clearance during the day and night, and diminished lower esophageal sphincter pressures.

Effect of positions, eating, and bronchodilators on gastroesophageal reflux in asthmatics.

Gastroesophageal reflux is common in asthmatics. To determine whether bronchodilators, the supine position, or eating affect gastroesophageal reflux, we performed ambulatory 24-hr pH monitoring on 44 controls and 104 unselected adult asthmatics. All asthmatics had discrete attacks of wheezing and documented reversible airway obstruction of at least 20%. The presence or absence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms was not used as a criterion for patient selection. Chronic bronchodilator therapy was required by 71.2% of the asthmatics, and was continued during the test. Asthmatics had significantly worse GER than controls during the 3-hr postprandial period, which continued into the nonpostprandial period up to the next meal. Significant differences were present for esophageal mucosal acid contact time, frequency of reflux episodes, and clearance times. During the nonpostprandial periods asthmatics had four times the acid reflux as controls and 19-fold the frequency of prolonged reflux episodes. There were no differences between asthmatics on bronchodilators and those not on bronchodilators in any of the reflux parameters during the upright (postprandial, nonpostprandial) period or supine (sleep) period (P = NS). We conclude that: (1) regardless of the use of bronchodilator therapy, asthmatics have significant GER when asleep and after meals that continues beyond the postprandial period to the next meal; and (2) asthmatics receiving bronchodilators have similar gastroesophageal reflux patterns after eating, in the nonpostprandial period, and when asleep as asthmatics not receiving bronchodilators.

Explosion-safe, enema-free, nutritious colonoscopy preparation using a prepackaged formula diet.

Breath hydrogen and methane concentrations were normal before morning colonoscopy in 72 ambulatory patients randomly assigned to Ensure or clear liquid diet preparation for 48 hours. Mechanical bowel preparation was equal with each diet using an evening-laxative and morning-enema regimen and with Ensure using two consecutive evenings of laxatives without enemas. Ensure is an explosion-safe, mechanically acceptable, nutritionally adequate method of colonoscopy preparation. With a suitable laxative, Ensure eliminates the need for enemas in colonoscopy preparation.