ABSTRACT
Loudness growth prediction using normal templates of loudness derived with ABR and DPOAE measures was investigated in 20 children 4 to 12 years and 20 adults with normal hearing. An ABR click latency-intensity function (LIF), ABR 2 kHz tone LIF, and DPOAE 2 kHz amplitude-intensity function (AIF) were recorded from each listener. A loudness-intensity function was also measured for each electrophysiologic stimulus. Children and adults exhibited similar intensity functions of ABR latency, DPOAE amplitude, and loudness. A statistically significant relationship was found between loudness and ABR latency and DPOAE amplitude. Loudness estimation equations derived with ABR latency and DPOAE amplitude accurately and reliably predicted the loudness-intensity functions of the listeners. Normative ABR and DPOAE templates of predicted loudness growth may have clinical application in site-of-lesion assessment or hearing aid fitting by distinguishing abnormal rates of loudness growth for individuals who cannot provide reliable behavioral measures.
Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Hearing Disorders/diagnosis , Loudness Perception/physiology , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Acoustic Impedance Tests , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
The test efficiency and reliability of loudness assessment using a computer-controlled method of cross-modality matching (CMM) between line length and loudness was investigated in children 4 to 12 years with normal hearing or mild to severe degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Adult listeners with normal hearing served as a comparison group. Computer-generated visual and acoustic stimuli were used to derive individual loudness data. Children and adults with normal hearing presented with similar loudness functions, while children with sensorineural hearing loss had steeper functions than their normal-hearing counterparts. Retest data supported reliability of the CMM method with children within the current study and between previous studies performed with a similar, but manual, method. The computer CMM approach proved more time efficient than the manual one, halving the test time. The CMM loudness task in a computerized version may have potential in a research or clinical setting, in particular for individualizing hearing aid fittings with children.
