Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 67(3): 341-345, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29601433

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Thiopurines are commonly used in the maintenance of remission for children with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Variation in drug metabolism may affect hepatotoxicity or therapeutic effect. We aimed to describe our center's experience with thiopurine optimization through the use of reduced thiopurine dosing in combination with allopurinol upon hepatotoxicity, drug metabolite levels, and clinical outcomes in children with IBD. METHODS: Patients aged 2 to 21 years with IBD treated with the combination of thiopurines/allopurinol between 2008 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients previously treated with antitumor necrosis factor therapy were excluded. Demographic data, transaminase levels (aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase), drug metabolites levels (6-thioguanine [6-TG], 6-methylmercaptopurine), physician global assessment, and corticosteroid use were recorded at baseline, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (29 girls, 56%) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-two of 52 (62%) remained on the combination for 12 months. In those remaining on the thiopurine/allopurinol combination, median alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase levels were reduced (P < 0.001) and median 6-TG levels were increased (P < 0.001) at both 6 and 12 months. Corticosteroid use was decreased at both 6 (P < 0.001) and 12 months (P < 0.001) compared to use at baseline. Remission rates also improved at both 6 (P = 0.013) and 12 months (P = 0.003). Twenty of the 52 patients (38%) had discontinued the thiopurine/allopurinol combination within 12 months of initiation with 17 of 52 (33%) initiating antitumor necrosis factor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose thiopurines in combination with allopurinol improved hepatotoxicity and increased 6-TG levels in children with IBD. Corticosteroid use was reduced and remission rates improved in those patients remaining on this combination for 1 year. However, approximately 40% of patients required a change in therapy within 12 months.


Subject(s)
Allopurinol/therapeutic use , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Mercaptopurine/analogs & derivatives , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Free Radical Scavengers/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Mercaptopurine/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 63(6): 651-657, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26960176

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) are both common and increasing. The definition of CAM therapy among both practitioners and patients is variable. The aim of our study was to update our understanding of how pediatric IBD patients use, perceive, and define CAM therapies. METHODS: We surveyed families of patients with IBD followed in the Gastroenterology Division at Nationwide Children's Hospital in summer 2014 during a routine clinic visit. The survey included questions about the following demographic and disease information; use and side effects associated with prior conventional therapies (CT); and attitudes toward, and use of CAM. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 104 of 118 patients approached (14 ±â€Š3 years; 43% women). Patients had previously used an average of 3 CT. CAM therapy was used by 84% of patients surveyed, although only 24% of patients/families considered themselves to be using CAM. Common CAM therapies included vitamins/supplements, stress management techniques, and/or dietary changes. Factors associated with using specific CAM therapies included self-reported prior CT-related side effects (P < 0.01) and moderate/severe disease activity (P < 0.01). Most families (77%) desired to learn more about CAM. CONCLUSIONS: Patients seen in a tertiary care center for pediatric IBD frequently integrated CAM therapies into their treatment regimen. Patients with prior side effects from CT or more severe disease were more likely to use CAM. Given the high prevalence of CAM use, pediatric gastrointestinal physicians should be knowledgeable and open to discussions about CAM therapies with their patients.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative/therapy , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Crohn Disease/therapy , Adolescent , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Complementary Therapies/adverse effects , Complementary Therapies/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Preference/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...