Repeatability and agreement of swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry biometers in myopes.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Biometric measurements in the context of myopia are fundamental to detect eyes at risk of developing myopia and during the follow-up of patients with myopia control treatment. Thus, the accuracy of biometers has high clinical relevance. BACKGROUND: The Myopia Master is a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry especially dedicated to the follow-up of myopic patients. This study aims to assess the repeatability of the Myopia Master and evaluate its agreement with a swept-source optical coherence interferometry biometer (IOL Master 700). METHODS: This cross-sectional prospective study assessed the biometric parameters of two groups of myopes (age range: 8-16 years old), spectacle corrected (n = 60) and orthokeratology contact lens wearers (n = 60). One senior optometrist performed two consecutive measurements per instrument, which included axial length, mean keratometry and horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID). The repeatability of each device and the agreement between devices were assessed by the dispersion of the measurement differences, for AL, mean keratometry, corneal astigmatism and HVID. RESULTS: The two biometers measured approximately the same value in both measurements. Test-retest repeatability tended to be lower than clinical significant thresholds, in particular, for AL and mean keratometry. Corneal-related parameters tended to have lower repeatability in the orthokeratology group, especially mean keratometry. The agreement between instruments revealed statistically significant differences between devices with the SS-OCT measuring longer eyes, steeper corneas and larger HVID. CONCLUSIONS: In a paediatric population, the Myopia Master showed clinically acceptable repeatability levels, but the IOL Master 700 demonstrated superior repeatability. Eyes treated with orthokeratology may compromise the repeatability of the corneal-related parameters. The Myopia Master and the IOL Master 700 are repeatable devices appropriate for monitoring myopia progression, but the differences observed do not allow their use interchangeably.

Association between Clinical Vision Measures and Visual Perception and Soccer Referees' On-field Performance.

SIGNIFICANCE: The decisions taken by soccer officials are critically important to game management. Understanding the underlying processes that mediate expert performance in soccer refereeing may lead to a better standard of officiating. Vision is the dominant source of incoming information upon which officials rely to make their on-field decisions. PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that performance on generic tests of vision and visual perception predicts domain-specific performance in elite-level soccer referees (R) and assistant referees (AR). METHODS: We assessed the vision of R and AR who officiate at the highest level in Portugal. To be eligible for inclusion, R and AR had to have officiated for at least two consecutive seasons across the 2014/2015, 2015/2016, and 2016/2017 seasons. A single, rank-order list of the performance of eligible officials was created based on the rank-order list for each season that was made by the Portuguese Soccer Federation. Clinical vision measures included visual acuity and stereoacuity, and visual perception measures were gathered using the Test of Visual Perceptual Skills, Third Edition. RESULTS: A total of 59 officials participated (21 R, 38 AR), 17 of whom officiated at the international level. The R and AR groups did not differ in vision or visual perception measures. We found that better stereoacuity (P < .001) and visual memory (P = .001) are associated with a higher rank order of on-field performance after adjusting for the age, experience, the national/international status, and the regional affiliation of the officials. Together, these two measures explain 22% of the variance in rank-order performance. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show a link between the vision of officials and their on-field performance. The origin and significance of these findings remain to be established, and further work is required to establish whether they are component skills in the domain of soccer refereeing.

The effect of astigmatic axis on visual acuity measured with different alphabets in Roman alphabet readers.

OBJECTIVE: Astigmatism produces meridional variations in the retinal blur pattern, thus interacting with object spatial detail and altering visual performance as the axis changes. This study investigates the influence of astigmatic axis orientation on visual acuity (VA) for four alphabets used worldwide. METHODS: Visual acuity was measured monocularly in 25 Roman alphabet users (mean age: 25.6±7.5 years) using computer-presented logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log-MAR) charts with letters from four different alphabets (Arabic, Chinese, Roman, and Tamil). VA was assessed under the effect of four optical conditions: best distance correction and three astigmatic conditions (using a +2.00 cylindrical diopter trial case lens with its axis oriented at 180, 45, or 90 degrees). For each alphabet, single optotypes were presented on a monitor viewed from a distance of 4.0 m, and a matching technique was used to identify the letters. RESULTS: The degradation in VA with astigmatic defocus was influenced by the alphabet used (p<0.001) and by the astigmatic axis (p<0.001). Interactions in VA degradation between astigmatic axes and alphabet (p<0.001) showed differences within 0.10 logMAR. These interactions were more pronounced in alphabets with higher dominance of curves and vertical (Tamil) and horizontal (Arabic) detail. CONCLUSION: Interactions between alphabet and type of astigmatism indicate that the effects of meridional blur on letter discrimination differ between alphabets. These findings have relevance in the way VA is assessed in populations using different typographies, and ultimately in the impact of astigmatic axis on their visual performance.

Vision in high-level football officials.

Officiating in football depends, at least to some extent, upon adequate visual function. However, there is no vision standard for football officiating and the nature of the relationship between officiating performance and level of vision is unknown. As a first step in characterising this relationship, we report on the clinically-measured vision and on the perceived level of vision in elite-level, Portuguese football officials. Seventy-one referees (R) and assistant referees (AR) participated in the study, representing 92% of the total population of elite level football officials in Portugal in the 2013/2014 season. Nine of the 22 Rs (40.9%) and ten of the 49 ARs (20.4%) were international-level. Information about visual history was also gathered. Perceived vision was assessed using the preference-values-assigned-to-global-visual-status (PVVS) and the Quality-of-Vision (QoV) questionnaire. Standard clinical vision measures (including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and stereopsis) were gathered in a subset (n = 44, 62%) of the participants. Data were analysed according to the type (R/AR) and level (international/national) of official, and Bonferroni corrections were applied to reduce the risk of type I errors. Adopting criterion for statistical significance of p<0.01, PVVS scores did not differ between R and AR (p = 0.88), or between national- and international-level officials (p = 0.66). Similarly, QoV scores did not differ between R and AR in frequency (p = 0.50), severity (p = 0.71) or bothersomeness (p = 0.81) of symptoms, or between international-level vs national-level officials for frequency (p = 0.03) or bothersomeness (p = 0.07) of symptoms. However, international-level officials reported less severe symptoms than their national-level counterparts (p<0.01). Overall, 18.3% of officials had either never had an eye examination or if they had, it was more than 3 years previously. Regarding refractive correction, 4.2% had undergone refractive surgery and 23.9% wear contact lenses when officiating. Clinical vision measures in the football officials were similar to published normative values for young, adult populations and similar between R and AR. Clinically-measured vision did not differ according to officiating level. Visual acuity measured with and without a pinhole disc indicated that around one quarter of participants may be capable of better vision when officiating, as evidenced by better acuity (≥1 line of letters) using the pinhole. Amongst the clinical visual tests we used, we did not find evidence for above-average performance in elite-level football officials. Although the impact of uncorrected mild to moderate refractive error upon officiating performance is unknown, with a greater uptake of eye examinations, visual acuity may be improved in around a quarter of officials.