ABSTRACT
Se presenta un caso clínico en el que se rehabilita a una paciente con maxilar superior atrófico mediante una combinación de implantes cigomáticos, colocados mediante una aproximación exteriorizada, e implantes anteriores convencionales palatinizados. Se realizó un procedimiento de regeneración ósea guiada alrededor de los implantes cigomáticos para obtener un mayor grosor de la cortical vestibular y palatina alrededor de los implantes del maxilar superior y mejorar el pronóstico. A un año de la carga protésica, el hueso periimplantario se mantiene estable
A clinical case is presented in which a patient with atrophic upper jaw is rehabilitated by a combination of zygomatic implants, placed using an exteriorized approach, and conventional palatalized anterior implants. A guided bone regeneration procedure is performed around the zygomatic implants to obtain a greater thickness of the facial bone and improve the prognosis. One year after loading, the peri-implant bone remains stable
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Bone Regeneration , Atrophy/diagnostic imaging , Dental Implants , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Jaw, Edentulous/surgery , Zygoma/surgery , Atrophy/surgery , Maxilla/abnormalities , Maxilla/surgery , Zygoma/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) comprises a group of hereditary disorders characterized by mechanical fragility of the skin and mucous membranes, with the development of blisters and vesicles in response to minimum tissue friction. Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) with generalized involvement is the most common subtype in the oral cavity. The present study was carried out to investigate dental implant survival, peri-implant tissue condition, patient satisfaction, and the impact of treatment upon the quality of life of patients with RDEB rehabilitated with implants and full-arch implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with RDEB underwent dental implant treatment between September 2005 and December 2016. A retrospective study was made to analyze implant survival, peri-implant tissue health and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 80 implants were placed (42 in the maxilla and 38 in the mandible) in 13 patients between 20-52 years of age and diagnosed with RDEB. All the implants were rehabilitated on a deferred basis with 20 full-arch prostheses. Fifteen fixed prostheses and 5 implant-supported overdentures were placed. The implant survival rate was 97.5% after a mean follow-up of 7.5 years after prosthetic loading. Fifty percent of the implants showed mucositis at the time of evaluation. Probing depth was maintained at 1-3 mm in 96.2% of the implants, and bleeding upon probing was observed in 67.5% of the implants. There was a high prevalence of bacterial plaque (85%). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of edentulous patients with RDEB by means of implants and implant-supported prostheses is predictable as evidenced by the high success rate, and improves patient self-esteem and quality of life.
Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica , Jaw, Edentulous , Adult , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Dental Restoration Failure , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Maxilla , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical behavior of one-piece complete-coverage crowns and fixed partial dentures (FPDs) on teeth with vertical preparation without finish line biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This prospective study included 52 patients requiring treatment with restorations in the esthetic region: 74 crowns and 27 FPDs. The sample included a total of 149 teeth that were prepared vertically without finish line. The sample was divided into two groups: one-piece crowns and FPDs, all with zirconia cores, feldspathic ceramic veneer, and a 0.5-mm prosthetic finish line of zirconia. All procedures were carried out at the University of Valencia from 2013 to 2014. The following parameters were evaluated over a two-year follow-up: oral hygiene, periodontal state, gingival thickening, gingival margin stability, the presence of complications, and restoration survival rate. Patient satisfaction with treatment was assessed by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: Two years after treatment, 80.5% of treated teeth remained free of gingival inflammation and bleeding. Mean gingival thickening was 0.41 ± 0.28 mm for one-piece crowns and 0.38 ± 0.36 mm for FPDs. Gingival margin stability was 100%, but 2% of the sample presented biological complications. The VAS patient satisfaction scores were eight out of a maximum score of 10. CONCLUSIONS: Two years after treatment, vertical preparation without finish line produces gingival thickening, margin stability, and optimal esthetics. Neither crowns nor FPDs presented any mechanical complications.
