Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 47(2): 68-77, 2023 03.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37078847

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe our current protocol for surgical and postsurgical management of abdominal paragangliomas (PGLs) and pheochromocytomas, with a special focus on multidisciplinary management in centres with experience. METHODS: The physicians involved in the management of patients with abdominal PGLs and pheochromocytomas of our hospital reviewed systematically current knowledge on the surgical management of abdominal PGLs and pheochromocytomas. RESULTS: Currently, surgery is considered the treatment of choice for abdominal PGLs and pheochromocytomas. The choice of surgical approach is determined based on the location of the lesion, size, patient́s body habitus and the likelihood of malignancy. Laparoscopic surgery is usually considered the gold standard approach for pheochromocytomas, but open access should be considered in invasive and/or potentially malignant tumours >8-10 cm and for abdominal PGLs. Postsurgical management of pheochromocytomas and PGLs includes close hemodynamic monitoring and treatment of postsurgical complications, the pathological study of the surgical specimen, reassessment of hormonal and/or radiological status and planning of follow-up based on the risk of recurrence and malignancy. CONCLUSION: Surgery represents the treatment of choice of most abdominal PGLs and pheochromocytomas. Optimal postsurgical evaluation, including hemodynamic, pathological, hormonal, and radiological evaluation, should be performed by a multidisciplinary team specializing in PGL/pheochromocytoma management.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms , Laparoscopy , Paraganglioma , Pheochromocytoma , Humans , Pheochromocytoma/diagnosis , Pheochromocytoma/surgery , Paraganglioma/diagnostic imaging , Paraganglioma/surgery , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Adrenalectomy/methods
2.
Actas urol. esp ; 47(2): 68-77, mar. 2023. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-217256

ABSTRACT

Objetivo Describir nuestro protocolo actual para el manejo quirúrgico y posquirúrgico de los paragangliomas abdominales (PGL) y los feocromocitomas, con especial atención en el manejo multidisciplinar en centros con experiencia. Métodos Los facultativos implicados en el tratamiento de pacientes con PGL abdominales y feocromocitomas de nuestro hospital revisaron sistemáticamente la evidencia científica actualmente disponible sobre el tratamiento quirúrgico de los PGL abdominales y feocromocitomas. Resultados La cirugía se considera el tratamiento de primera elección para los PGL abdominales y feocromocitomas. La decisión sobre el tipo de abordaje quirúrgico se basa en la localización y el tamaño de la lesión, la constitución corporal del paciente y la probabilidad estimada de malignidad. La cirugía laparoscópica suele considerarse el abordaje de referencia para los feocromocitomas, pero en los tumores invasivos y/o potencialmente malignos de más de 8-10 cm y en los PGL abdominales debe considerarse el abordaje abierto. El tratamiento posquirúrgico de los feocromocitomas y los PGL incluye una monitorización hemodinámica estrecha, el tratamiento de las complicaciones posoperatorias, el estudio patológico de la muestra quirúrgica, la reevaluación del estado hormonal y/o radiológico y la planificación del seguimiento en función del riesgo de recurrencia y malignidad. Conclusión La cirugía representa el tratamiento de elección de la mayoría de los PGL abdominales y feocromocitomas. La evaluación posoperatoria óptima, que incluye la evaluación hemodinámica, patológica, hormonal y radiológica, debe ser realizada por un equipo multidisciplinar especializado en el tratamiento de PGL/feocromocitomas (AU)


Purpose To describe our current protocol for surgical and postsurgical management of abdominal paragangliomas (PGLs) and pheochromocytomas, with a special focus on multidisciplinary management in centres with experience. Methods The physicians involved in the management of patients with abdominal PGLs and pheochromocytomas of our hospital reviewed systematically current knowledge on the surgical management of abdominal PGLs and pheochromocytomas. Results Currently, surgery is considered the treatment of choice for abdominal PGLs and pheochromocytomas. The choice of surgical approach is determined based on the location of the lesion, size, patient́s body habitus and the likelihood of malignancy. Laparoscopic surgery is usually considered the gold standard approach for pheochromocytomas, but open access should be considered in invasive and/or potentially malignant tumours > 8-10 cm and for abdominal PGLs. Postsurgical management of pheochromocytomas and PGLs includes close hemodynamic monitoring and treatment of postsurgical complications, the pathological study of the surgical specimen, reassessment of hormonal and/or radiological status and planning of follow-up based on the risk of recurrence and malignancy. Conclusion Surgery represents the treatment of choice of most abdominal PGLs and pheochromocytomas. Optimal postsurgical evaluation, including hemodynamic, pathological, hormonal, and radiological evaluation, should be performed by a multidisciplinary team specializing in PGL/pheochromocytoma management (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Abdominal Neoplasms/surgery , Paraganglioma/surgery , Pheochromocytoma/surgery , Postoperative Period , Clinical Protocols
3.
J Endocrinol Invest ; 44(12): 2545-2555, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34304388

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To offer a practical guide for the presurgical and anesthetic management of pheochromocytomas and sympathetic paragangliomas (PGLs). METHODS: This protocol was based on a comprehensive review of the literature and on our own multidisciplinary team's experience from managing pheochromocytoma and sympathetic PGLs at a referral center. RESULTS: Patients with pheochromocytomas and sympathetic paragangliomas (PGLs) may develop potentially life-threatening complications, especially during surgical procedures. A complete biochemical, radiological, genetic, and cardiological assessment is recommended in the preoperative stage as it provides an evaluation of the risk of surgical complications and malignancy, allowing individualization of the presurgical treatment. Treatment with α-blockade and proper volume expansion in the preoperative stage significantly reduces the perioperative morbidity. During surgery, the anesthesiologist should look for a deep anesthetic level that inhibits the cardiovascular effects of catecholamines to minimize the risk of intraoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: An optimal presurgical evaluation of pheochromocytomas/ sympathetic PGL requires a multidisciplinary approach, including a complete hormonal, radiological, cardiac, genetic, and functioning evaluation in most cases. A proper preoperative evaluation in combination with strict blood pressure and heart rate control, and blood volume status optimization, will significantly reduce the risk of intraoperative and perioperative complications. In those patients who unfortunately develop intraoperative complications, the role of the anesthesiologist is essential since the selection of the appropriate management has a direct impact on morbimortality reduction.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/surgery , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Paraganglioma/surgery , Pheochromocytoma/surgery , Preoperative Care/methods , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Paraganglioma/pathology , Patient Care Planning/standards , Pheochromocytoma/pathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Adjustment
4.
Br J Anaesth ; 120(4): 734-744, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29576114

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative complications in patients having major elective surgery using oesophageal Doppler monitor-guided goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT), in which administration of fluids, inotropes, and vasopressors was guided by stroke volume, mean arterial pressure, and cardiac index. METHODS: The FEDORA trial was a prospective, multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, controlled patient- and observer-blind trial conducted in adults scheduled for major elective surgery. Randomization and allocation were carried out by a central computer system. In the control group, intraoperative fluids were given based on traditional principles. In the GDHT group, the intraoperative goals were to maintain a maximal stroke volume, with mean arterial pressure >70 mm Hg, and cardiac index ≥2.5 litres min-1 m-2. The primary outcome was percentage of patients with moderate or severe postoperative complications during the first 180 days after surgery. RESULTS: In total, 450 patients were randomized to the GDHT group (n=224) or control group (n=226). Data from 420 subjects were analysed. There were significantly fewer with complications in the GDHT group (8.6% vs 16.6%, P=0.018). There were also fewer complications (acute kidney disease, pulmonary oedema, respiratory distress syndrome, wound infections, etc.), and length of hospital stay was shorter in the GDHT group. There was no significant difference in mortality between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oesophageal Doppler monitor-guided GDHT reduced postoperative complications and hospital length of stay in low-moderate risk patients undergoing intermediate risk surgery, with no difference in mortality at 180 days. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN93543537.


Subject(s)
Cardiotonic Agents/administration & dosage , Fluid Therapy/methods , Hemodynamics/physiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage , Elective Surgical Procedures , Esophagus , Female , Goals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods
5.
Br J Anaesth ; 95(3): 358-61, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16040634

ABSTRACT

The anaesthetic and critical care management of blunt abdominal trauma in a patient previously diagnosed with non-compaction of the left ventricular myocardium (a rare autosomal dominant inherited disease) is reported. The management was influenced by the presence of an implanted automated internal defibrillator and treatment with anticoagulants because of the high frequency of severe arrhythmias and systemic embolism. The pathophysiology of ventricular non-compaction is reviewed briefly.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies/complications , Hemoperitoneum/therapy , Splenic Rupture/therapy , Adult , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Cardiomyopathies/diagnosis , Critical Care/methods , Hemoperitoneum/complications , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Perioperative Care/methods , Splenic Rupture/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...