ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Kangaroo care (KC) is an evidence-based best practice that can prevent major health complications in preterm infants. However, there is a lack of evidence on the feasibility and safety of placing extremely preterm infants under 28 weeks gestational age in KC position. AIM: To compare thermal stability 60 min after the first KC session in the lateral versus prone position in extremely preterm infants under 28 weeks gestational age. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single-centre, randomized, non-inferiority, parallel clinical trial. The patients were extremely preterm infants during their first 5 days of life. Infants in the intervention group received KC in the lateral position while those in the control group received KC in the prone position. All infants receiving KC were inside their polyethylene bags but maintained skin-to-skin contact. The primary outcome was the axillary temperature of the infants, and the secondary outcome was the development of intraventricular haemorrhage. RESULTS: Seventy infants were randomized (35 per group). The mean gestational age was 26 +1(1+1) in both groups. In the first KC session, the infant temperature at 60 minutes was 36.79°C (0.43) in lateral KC position, and 36.78°C (0.38) in prone KC position (p = .022). In lateral KC position, 7.69% (2) of the children who, according to the cranial ultrasound performed before the first session, had no haemorrhage presented with intraventricular haemorrhage after the first session. In prone KC position, new haemorrhages appeared after the first session in 29.17% (7) (p = .08). CONCLUSIONS: The lateral KC position is an alternative to the conventional prone KC position and maintains normothermia in infants under 28 weeks gestational age. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Extremely preterm infants are candidates for KC. Lateral KC position is an evidence-based best practice that can be applied to preterm infants under 28 weeks GA. This evidence is particularly useful in performing umbilical catheterization on these patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, there are no validated neonatal pain assessment scales in Spanish. Given the need for such a scale, a study was undertaken to adapt and validate the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) scale. After translation and back-translation, content validity was addressed, a crucial phase in validation studies, in which researchers examine whether the items that make up the scale represent the content that the scale is intended to assess. AIMS: The aim was to provide evidence for the content validity of the Spanish adaptation of the PIPP-R scale. METHOD: The study used the Delphi technique with 10 experts. Data collection was anonymous and was conducted through an online platform. It was an ad hoc survey consisting of four questions, with a five-point Likert scale for each item on the scale and for the instruction table. An item-content validity index (I-CVI) and a scale-content validity index (S-CVI) were calculated for the analysis. RESULTS: After two rounds of the survey, all items exceeded an I-CVI of 0.9. The S-CVI value was 0.98 (±0.03) for the scale, and 1 for its instruction table. The kappa index yielded values indicating an excellent degree of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the PIPP-R obtained a high degree of content validity according to the expert group and the Delphi technique.
