Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 58
Filter
1.
Eur J Neurosci ; 59(11): 3117-3133, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38622053

ABSTRACT

Masking experiments, using vertical and horizontal sinusoidal depth corrugations, have suggested the existence of more than two spatial-frequency disparity mechanisms. This result was confirmed through an individual differences approach. Here, using factor analytic techniques, we want to investigate the existence of independent temporal mechanisms in frontoparallel stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion. To construct stereomotion, we used sinusoidal depth corrugations obtained with dynamic random-dot stereograms. Thus, no luminance motion was present monocularly. We measured disparity thresholds for drifting vertical (up-down) and horizontal (left-right) sinusoidal corrugations of 0.4 cyc/deg at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 Hz. In total, we tested 34 participants. Results showed a small orientation anisotropy with lower thresholds for horizontal corrugations. Disparity thresholds as a function of temporal frequency were almost constant from 0.25 up to 1 Hz, and then they increased monotonically. Principal component analysis uncovered two significant factors for vertical and two for horizontal corrugations. Varimax rotation showed that one factor loaded from 0.25 to 1-2 Hz and a second factor from 2 to 4 to 8 Hz. Direct Oblimin rotation indicated a moderate intercorrelation of both factors. Our results suggest the possible existence of two somewhat interdependent temporal mechanisms involved in frontoparallel stereomotion.


Subject(s)
Depth Perception , Individuality , Vision Disparity , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Depth Perception/physiology , Vision Disparity/physiology , Young Adult , Photic Stimulation/methods
2.
Vision Res ; 208: 108222, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37004491

ABSTRACT

Recent results have shown that males have lower duration thresholds for motion direction discrimination than females. Measuring contrast thresholds, a previous study has shown that males have a greater sensitivity to fine details and fast flickering stimuli than females, and that females have a higher sensitivity to low spatial frequencies modulated at low temporal frequencies. Here, we present the data of a contrast-detection motion discrimination experiment and a reanalysis of four different motion discrimination experiments where we compare duration thresholds for males and females using different spatial frequencies, stimulus sizes, contrasts, and temporal frequencies (in two experiments, motion surround suppression was measured). Results from the main experiment and the reanalysis show that, in general, the association between sex and contrast and duration thresholds for motion discrimination is not significant, with males and females showing similar data patterns. Only the reanalysis of one out of four studies revealed different duration thresholds between males and females paired with a strong effect size supporting previous results in the literature, although motion surround suppression was identical between groups. Importantly, most of our results do not show significant differences between males and females in contrast and duration thresholds, suggesting that the sex variable may not be as relevant as previously claimed when testing visual motion discrimination.


Subject(s)
Motion Perception , Male , Humans , Female , Contrast Sensitivity , Sensory Thresholds , Photic Stimulation/methods , Visual Perception
3.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 63(12): 26, 2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36394846

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The stereoscopic anisotropy is one of the most intriguing phenomena of stereoscopic vision. It shows that the disparity thresholds to detect three-dimensional sinusoidal horizontal corrugations are much lower than for vertical corrugations for spatial frequencies lower than 1 cycles/deg. A recent study has shown that the anisotropy increases during childhood and that visual experience probably plays an important role in its development (Serrano-Pedraza et al., 2016). Here we want to determine the impact that the visual experience has throughout life in the stereoscopic anisotropy. Methods: We performed two experiments testing two age groups of 35 participants each: the young group aged 18 to 45 years and the old group aged 62 to 90 years. We measured disparity thresholds for three-dimensional sinusoidal corrugations of 0.1 cyc/deg, with either vertical or horizontal orientation. Detection thresholds were obtained using Bayesian adaptive staircases. For each participant we computed the anisotropy index by subtracting the thresholds in logarithmic units of the vertical minus the horizontal corrugation. Results: The analyses show that stereo thresholds for vertical corrugations are similar for both groups, however, for horizontal corrugations the thresholds are much lower for the young group. Therefore, the anisotropy was much stronger in the young group (mean, 0.67 ± 0.46) than for the old group (mean, 0.24 ± 0.3). Pearson correlation between the anisotropy index and age shows a negative and significant correlation (r = -0.49; P = 1.83 × 10-5; N = 70), that is, as age advances, the anisotropy decreases. Conclusions: Thus, visual experience plays an important role in the development of stereo vision. Although disparity thresholds for horizontal corrugations in the older group are higher, surprisingly, disparity thresholds for vertical corrugations remain stable and do not change. Therefore, the stereoscopic anisotropy decreases with aging.


Subject(s)
Depth Perception , Vision Disparity , Humans , Aged , Anisotropy , Bayes Theorem , Sensory Thresholds
4.
Vision Res ; 184: 58-73, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33873123

ABSTRACT

During smooth pursuit eye movements, the visual system is faced with the task of telling apart reafferent retinal motion from motion in the world. While an efference copy signal can be used to predict the amount of reafference to subtract from the image, an image-based adaptive mechanism can ensure the continued accuracy of this computation. Indeed, repeatedly exposing observers to background motion with a fixed direction relative to that of the target that is pursued leads to a shift in their point of subjective stationarity (PSS). We asked whether the effect of exposure reflects adaptation to motion contingent on pursuit direction, recalibration of a reference signal or both. A recalibration account predicts a shift in reference signal (i.e. predicted reafference), resulting in a shift of PSS, but no change in sensitivity. Results show that both directional judgements and confidence judgements about them favor a recalibration account, whereby there is an adaptive shift in the reference signal caused by the prevailing retinal motion during pursuit. We also found that the recalibration effect is specific to the exposed visual hemifield.


Subject(s)
Motion Perception , Pursuit, Smooth , Adaptation, Physiological , Eye Movements , Humans , Photic Stimulation
5.
J Vis ; 21(1): 10, 2021 01 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33450007

ABSTRACT

Motion discrimination of large stimuli is impaired at high contrast and short durations. This psychophysical result has been linked with the center-surround suppression found in neurons of area MT. Recent physiology results have shown that most frontoparallel MT cells respond more strongly to binocular than to monocular stimulation. Here we measured the surround suppression strength under binocular and monocular viewing. Thirty-nine participants took part in two experiments: (a) where the nonstimulated eye viewed a blank field of the same luminance (n = 8) and (b) where it was occluded with a patch (n = 31). In both experiments, we measured duration thresholds for small (1 deg diameter) and large (7 deg) drifting gratings of 1 cpd with 85% contrast. For each subject, a Motion Suppression Index (MSI) was computed by subtracting the duration thresholds in logarithmic units of the large minus the small stimulus. Results were similar in both experiments. Combining the MSI of both experiments, we found that the strength of suppression for binocular condition (MSIbinocular = 0.249 ± 0.126 log10 (ms)) is 1.79 times higher than under monocular viewing (MSImonocular = 0.139 ± 0.137 log10 (ms)). This increase is too high to be explained by the higher perceived contrast of binocular stimuli and offers a new way of testing whether MT neurons account for surround suppression. Potentially, differences in surround suppression reported in clinical populations may reflect altered binocular processing.


Subject(s)
Motion Perception/physiology , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Adult , Humans , Male , Psychophysics , Vision, Binocular/physiology
6.
IEEE Trans Haptics ; 14(3): 538-550, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33378262

ABSTRACT

The characterization of vibrotactile perception is crucial to accurately configure haptic devices and create appropriate stimuli for improving user performance in human-machine interaction systems. This article presents a study aiming to determine the absolute and differential vibrotactile thresholds in different areas of the torso to develop reliable haptic patterns to be displayed using a haptic vest. In the 'absolute threshold' experiment, we measure the minimum detectable vibration using a forced-choice task. Furthermore, in the 'differential threshold' experiment, we measure the minimum frequency change needed for users to discriminate two successive vibrotactile stimuli using a vibration matching task. The first experiment does not show differences between absolute thresholds, opening up the possibility of setting a unique minimal vibration for creating haptic patterns. Similarly, the second experiment does not show differences between differential thresholds. Moreover, as these thresholds follow Weber's law, it is viable to estimate any upper or lower differential threshold for any reference stimulus using a K-value. These results are a first step for creating vibrotactile patterns over the torso with the employed eccentric rotating mass motors. Moreover, the whole study provides a method to obtain these psychophysical values since the usage of different motors can change these results.


Subject(s)
Torso , Vibration , Differential Threshold , Humans
7.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 40(6): 815-827, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32989799

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In 2019, we described ASTEROID, a new stereotest run on a 3D tablet computer which involves a four-alternative disparity detection task on a dynamic random-dot stereogram. Stereo thresholds measured with ASTEROID were well correlated with, but systematically higher than (by a factor of around 1.5), thresholds measured with previous laboratory stereotests or the Randot Preschool clinical stereotest. We speculated that this might be due to the relatively large, sparse dots used in ASTEROID v0.9. Here, we introduce and test the stereo thresholds and test-repeatability of the new ASTEROID v1.0, which uses precomputed images to allow stereograms made up of much smaller, denser dots. METHODS: Stereo thresholds and test/retest repeatability were tested and compared between the old and new versions of ASTEROID (n = 75) and the Randot Circles (n = 31) stereotest, in healthy young adults. RESULTS: Thresholds on ASTEROID v1.0 are lower (better) than on ASTEROID v0.9 by a factor of 1.4, and do not differ significantly from thresholds on the Randot Circles. Thresholds were roughly log-normally distributed with a mean of 1.54 log10 arcsec (35 arcsec) on ASTEROID v1.0 compared to 1.70 log10 arcsec (50 arcsec) on ASTEROID v0.9. The standard deviation between observers was the same for both versions, 0.32 log10 arcsec, corresponding to a factor of 2 above and below the mean. There was no difference between the versions in their test/retest repeatability, with 95% coefficient of repeatability = 0.46 log10 arcsec (a factor of 2.9 or 1.5 octaves) and a Pearson correlation of 0.8 (comparable to other clinical stereotests). CONCLUSION: The poorer stereo thresholds previously reported with ASTEROID v0.9 appear to have been due to the relatively large, coarse dots and low density used, rather than to some other aspect of the technology. Employing the small dots and high density used in ASTEROID v1.0, thresholds and test/retest repeatability are similar to other clinical stereotests.


Subject(s)
Computers, Handheld , Depth Perception/physiology , Sensory Thresholds/physiology , Strabismus/diagnosis , Vision Tests/methods , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Visual Acuity , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Strabismus/physiopathology , Young Adult
8.
Vision Res ; 175: 58-74, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32712430

ABSTRACT

The study of motion perception through classical psychophysical methods has suggested that independent spatiotemporal filters acting over specific locations in retinal images carry out early motion processing. On the other hand, individual differences approaches have been able to identify a structure of spatiotemporal filters too. In this same fashion-through an individual differences approach-the present study aims to uncover a structure of spatiotemporal frequency selective motion mechanisms. This is done, for the first time, using supra-threshold contrast stimuli in a motion direction discrimination task. Two experiments were performed measuring duration thresholds for drifting 2D Gabor gratings of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3 and 6 c/deg. They moved with a speed of 2 deg/sec, with Michelson contrasts of 0.1 or 0.9 (Experiment 1) or had a contrast of 0.9 drifting with a temporal frequency of 2 Hz or 8 Hz (Experiment 2). Principal component analyses uncover three factors in each of four conditions. When Varimax-rotated, these are seen to be selective to spatial frequencies lower than 0.5 c/deg, intermediate ones from 0.5 to 1-1.5 c/deg, and frequencies greater than 1-1.5 c/deg. Direct Oblimin rotations indicate that factors are moderately correlated. Further analyses show very slight differences in the correlational structures between contrast conditions (0.1 vs. 0.9), and no differences between temporal frequency conditions (2 Hz vs. 8 Hz). To conclude, the idea of a three-factor structure in motion processing for low, intermediate, and high spatial frequencies is supported.


Subject(s)
Individuality , Motion Perception , Humans , Motion , Sensory Thresholds , Time Factors
9.
Vision Res ; 167: 60-69, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31972446

ABSTRACT

Motion direction discrimination becomes impaired when combinations of drifting high spatial frequency (HSF) and static low spatial frequency (LSF) patterns are merged into a compound stimulus. Such impairment has been suggested to occur due to an interaction between motion sensors tuned to coarse and fine scale spatial patterns. This interaction is modulated by different stimulus parameters like temporal frequency, size, the spectral components mixed, and their relative contrast. The present research precisely aims to explore in a deeper way the interaction's dependency upon the spatial frequency and the relative contrast of the components when both move coherently. Two experiments were therefore performed measuring duration thresholds (Experiment 1) and proportion of correct responses (Experiment 2) in a motion direction discrimination task. Stimuli were vertical Gabor patches of 4 deg diameter horizontally drifting with a speed of 2 deg/sec. Simple LSF and HSF stimuli as well as complex stimuli where both components moved coherently (LSFm + HSFm) were used. These were grouped in the following LSF and HSF pairs: 0.25-0.75, 0.5-1.5, 1-3 and 2-6 c/deg. Each component had a Michelson contrast of 28% or 7%, giving rise to different relative contrast combinations. Most interestingly, the results show a decrease in performance for complex stimuli with respect to each of their simple components when the LSF component has a lower contrast than the HSF one. The decrease depends on the particular spatial frequencies mixed in a stimulus. Further knowledge about the inhibitory mechanism is thus provided, revealing its joint dependency upon contrast and spatial frequency.


Subject(s)
Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Discrimination, Psychological/physiology , Motion Perception/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Psychophysics , Sensory Thresholds/physiology , Young Adult
10.
PLoS One ; 15(1): e0226822, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31895925

ABSTRACT

Bayesian staircases are widely used in psychophysics to estimate detection thresholds. Simulations have revealed the importance of the parameters selected for the assumed subject's psychometric function in enabling thresholds to be estimated with small bias and high precision. One important parameter is the slope of the psychometric function, or equivalently its spread. This is often held fixed, rather than estimated for individual subjects, because much larger numbers of trials are required to estimate the spread as well as the threshold. However, if this fixed value is wrong, the threshold estimate can be biased. Here we determine the optimal slope to minimize bias and maximize precision when measuring stereoacuity with Bayesian staircases. We performed 2- and 4AFC disparity detection stereo experiments in order to measure the spread of the disparity psychometric function in human observers assuming a Logistic function. We found a wide range, between 0.03 and 3.5 log10 arcsec, with little change with age. We then ran simulations to examine the optimal spread using the empirical data. From our simulations and for three different experiments, we recommend selecting assumed spread values between the percentiles 60-80% of the population distribution of spreads (these percentiles can be extended to other type of thresholds). For stereo thresholds, we recommend a spread around the value σ = 1.7 log10 arcsec for 2AFC (slope ß = 4.3 /log10 arcsec), and around σ = 1.5 log10 arcsec for 4AFC (ß = 4.9 /log10 arcsec). Finally, we compared a Bayesian procedure (ZEST using the optimal σ) with five Bayesian procedures that are versions of ZEST-2D, Psi, and Psi-marginal. In general, for the conditions tested, ZEST optimal σ showed the lowest threshold bias and highest precision.


Subject(s)
Psychometrics/methods , Visual Perception/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Bayes Theorem , Child , Child, Preschool , Empirical Research , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychoacoustics , Sensory Thresholds , Young Adult
11.
Transl Vis Sci Technol ; 8(1): 25, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30834173

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe a new stereotest in the form of a game on an autostereoscopic tablet computer designed to be suitable for use in the eye clinic and present data on its reliability and the distribution of stereo thresholds in adults. METHODS: Test stimuli were four dynamic random-dot stereograms, one of which contained a disparate target. Feedback was given after each trial presentation. A Bayesian adaptive staircase adjusted target disparity. Threshold was estimated from the mean of the posterior distribution after 20 responses. Viewing distance was monitored via a forehead sticker viewed by the tablet's front camera, and screen parallax was adjusted dynamically so as to achieve the desired retinal disparity. RESULTS: The tablet must be viewed at a distance of greater than ∼35 cm to produce a good depth percept. Log thresholds were roughly normally distributed with a mean of 1.75 log10 arcsec = 56 arcsec and SD of 0.34 log10 arcsec = a factor of 2.2. The standard deviation agrees with previous studies, but ASTEROID thresholds are approximately 1.5 times higher than a similar stereotest on stereoscopic 3D TV or on Randot Preschool stereotests. Pearson correlation between successive tests in same observer was 0.80. Bland-Altman 95% limits of reliability were ±0.64 log10 arcsec = a factor of 4.3, corresponding to an SD of 0.32 log10 arcsec on individual threshold estimates. This is similar to other stereotests and close to the statistical limit for 20 responses. CONCLUSIONS: ASTEROID is reliable, easy, and portable and thus well-suited for clinical stereoacuity measurements. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: New 3D digital technology means that research-quality psychophysical measurement of stereoacuity is now feasible in the clinic.

12.
J Vis ; 18(13): 17, 2018 12 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30593062

ABSTRACT

The perceived direction of motion of a brief moving fine scale pattern reverses when a static coarse scale pattern is added to it (Henning & Derrington, 1988). This impairment in motion direction discrimination has been explained by the inhibitory interaction between motion sensors tuned to fine and coarse scales. This interaction depends on the particular spatial frequencies mixed, the size of the stimulus, and the relative contrast of the components (Serrano-Pedraza, Goddard, & Derrington, 2007; Serrano-Pedraza & Derrington, 2010). In this research we wanted to study the effect of speed or temporal frequency on the interaction between motion sensors. We performed three experiments where we measured duration thresholds in a motion direction discrimination task, and we also measured the proportion of correct responses. The stimuli used in the experiments were horizontally drifting vertical Gabor patches of 4° diameter (2σxy). In the first two experiments, five stimulus configurations of moving (m) and static (s) components were used: two simple stimuli, 1m c/° and 3m c/°; and three complex stimuli, 1m + 3m, 1m + 3s, and 1s + 3m. Results show that for all conditions but 1s + 3m, duration thresholds decrease (proportion of correct responses increase) with increasing speed. However, in condition 1s + 3m, duration thresholds increase from 0.5°/s to 2°/s and then decrease with increasing speed. In the third experiment we tested whether the interaction between scales is tuned to speed or temporal frequency using different conditions: 1s + 4m, 1s + 6m, 0.5s + 1.5m, and 2s + 6m. Results from duration thresholds suggest that the strength of the inhibitory interaction between motion sensors tuned to coarse and fine scales is temporal frequency tuned with a maximum around 6 Hz and a minimum between 6 and 12 Hz in the case of the proportion of correct responses.


Subject(s)
Discrimination, Psychological/physiology , Motion Perception/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Sensory Thresholds/physiology , Young Adult
13.
PLoS One ; 13(7): e0200151, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29979774

ABSTRACT

The impairment to discriminate the motion direction of a large high contrast stimulus or to detect a stimulus surrounded by another one is called visual suppression and is the result of the normal function of our visual inhibitory mechanisms. Recently, Melnick et al. (2013), using a motion discrimination task, showed that intelligence strongly correlates with visual suppression (r = 0.71). Cook et al. (2016) also showed a strong link between contrast surround suppression and IQ (r = 0.87), this time using a contrast matching task. Our aim is to test this link using two different visual suppression tasks: a motion discrimination task and a contrast detection task. Fifty volunteers took part in the experiments. Using Bayesian staircases, we measured duration thresholds in the motion experiment and contrast thresholds in the spatial experiment. Although we found a much weaker effect, our results from the motion experiment still replicate previous results supporting the link between motion surround suppression and IQ (r = 0.43). However, our results from the spatial experiment do not support the link between contrast surround suppression and IQ (r = -0.09). Methodological differences between this study and previous studies which could explain these discrepancies are discussed.


Subject(s)
Intelligence/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Bayes Theorem , Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Motion Perception/physiology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Psychophysics , Sensory Thresholds/physiology , Visual Cortex/physiology , Young Adult
14.
PLoS One ; 13(7): e0201366, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30059524

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Measuring accurate thresholds in children can be challenging. A typical psychophysical experiment is usually too long to keep children engaged. However, a reduction in the number of trials decreases the precision of the threshold estimate. We evaluated the efficiency of forced-choice paradigms with 2 or 4 alternatives (2-AFC, 4-AFC) in a disparity detection experiment. 4-AFC paradigms are statistically more efficient, but also more cognitively demanding, which might offset their theoretical advantage in young children. METHODS: We ran simulations evaluating bias and precision of threshold estimates of 2-AFC and 4-AFC paradigms. In addition, we measured disparity thresholds in 43 children (aged 6 to 17 years) with a 4-AFC paradigm and in 49 children (aged 4 to 17 years) with a 2-AFC paradigm, both using an adaptive weighted one-up one-down staircase. RESULTS: Simulations indicated a similar bias and precision for a 2-AFC paradigm with double the number of trials as a 4-AFC paradigm. On average, estimated threshold of the simulated data was equal to the model threshold, indicating no bias. The precision was improved with an increasing number of trials. Likewise, our data showed a similar bias and precision for a 2-AFC paradigm with 60 trials as for a 4-AFC paradigm with 30 trials. Trials in the 4-AFC paradigm took slightly longer as participants scanned more alternatives. However, the 4-AFC task still ended up faster for a given precision. CONCLUSION: Bias and precision were similar in a 4-AFC task compared to a 2-AFC task with double the number of trials. However, a 4-AFC paradigm was more time efficient and is therefore recommended.


Subject(s)
Vision, Binocular/physiology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male
15.
Biol Open ; 7(4)2018 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29700198

ABSTRACT

Recently, we showed a novel property of the Hassenstein-Reichardt detector, namely that insect motion detection can be masked by 'undetectable' noise, i.e. visual noise presented at spatial frequencies at which coherently moving gratings do not elicit a response (Tarawneh et al., 2017). That study compared the responses of human and insect motion detectors using different ways of quantifying masking (contrast threshold in humans and masking tuning function in insects). In addition, some adjustments in experimental procedure, such as presenting the stimulus at a short viewing distance, were necessary to elicit a response in insects. These differences offer alternative explanations for the observed difference between human and insect responses to visual motion noise. Here, we report the results of new masking experiments in which we test whether differences in experimental paradigm and stimulus presentation between humans and insects can account for the undetectable noise effect reported earlier. We obtained contrast thresholds at two signal and two noise frequencies in both humans and praying mantises (Sphodromantis lineola), and compared contrast threshold differences when noise has the same versus different spatial frequency as the signal. Furthermore, we investigated whether differences in viewing geometry had any qualitative impact on the results. Consistent with our earlier finding, differences in contrast threshold show that visual noise masks much more effectively when presented at signal spatial frequency in humans (compared to a lower or higher spatial frequency), while in insects, noise is roughly equivalently effective when presented at either the signal spatial frequency or lower (compared to a higher spatial frequency). The characteristic difference between human and insect responses was unaffected by correcting for the stimulus distortion caused by short viewing distances in insects. These findings constitute stronger evidence that the undetectable noise effect reported earlier is a genuine difference between human and insect motion processing, and not an artefact caused by differences in experimental paradigms.

16.
Vision Res ; 141: 127-135, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29155009

ABSTRACT

Threshold functions for sinusoidal depth corrugations typically reach their minimum (highest sensitivity) at spatial frequencies of 0.2-0.4 cycles/degree (cpd), with lower thresholds for horizontal than vertical corrugations at low spatial frequencies. To elucidate spatial frequency and orientation tuning of stereoscopic mechanisms, we measured the disparity sensitivity functions, and used factor analytic techniques to estimate the existence of independent underlying stereo channels. The data set (N = 30 individuals) was for horizontal and vertical corrugations of spatial frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 1.6 cpd. A principal component analysis of disparity sensitivities (log-arcsec) revealed that two significant factors accounted for 70% of the variability. Following Varimax rotation to approximate "simple structure", one factor clearly loaded onto low spatial frequencies (≤0.4 cpd), and a second was tuned to higher spatial frequencies (≥0.8 cpd). Each factor had nearly identical tuning (loadings) for horizontal and vertical patterns. The finding of separate factors for low and high spatial frequencies is consistent with previous studies. The failure to find separate factors for horizontal and vertical corrugations is somewhat surprising because the neuronal mechanisms are believed to be different. Following an oblique rotation (Direct Oblimin), the two factors correlated significantly, suggesting some interdependence rather than full independence between the two factors.


Subject(s)
Depth Perception/physiology , Sensory Thresholds/physiology , Vision Disparity/physiology , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Discrimination, Psychological , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Individuality , Male , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Young Adult
17.
Sci Rep ; 7(1): 3496, 2017 06 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28615659

ABSTRACT

The motion energy model is the standard account of motion detection in animals from beetles to humans. Despite this common basis, we show here that a difference in the early stages of visual processing between mammals and insects leads this model to make radically different behavioural predictions. In insects, early filtering is spatially lowpass, which makes the surprising prediction that motion detection can be impaired by "invisible" noise, i.e. noise at a spatial frequency that elicits no response when presented on its own as a signal. We confirm this prediction using the optomotor response of praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola. This does not occur in mammals, where spatially bandpass early filtering means that linear systems techniques, such as deriving channel sensitivity from masking functions, remain approximately valid. Counter-intuitive effects such as masking by invisible noise may occur in neural circuits wherever a nonlinearity is followed by a difference operation.


Subject(s)
Motion Perception , Animals , Female , Male , Mantodea , Models, Biological , Perceptual Masking , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
18.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 37(4): 507-520, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28337792

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: It has been repeatedly shown that the TNO stereotest overestimates stereo threshold compared to other clinical stereotests. In the current study, we test whether this overestimation can be attributed to a distinction between 'global' (or 'cyclopean') and 'local' (feature or contour-based) stereopsis. METHODS: We compared stereo thresholds of a global (TNO) and a local clinical stereotest (Randot Circles). In addition, a global and a local psychophysical stereotest were added to the design. One hundred and forty-nine children between 4 and 16 years old were included in the study. RESULTS: Stereo threshold estimates with TNO were a factor of two higher than with any of the other stereotests. No significant differences were found between the other tests. Bland-Altman analyses also indicated low agreement between TNO and the other stereotests, especially for higher stereo threshold estimates. Simulations indicated that the TNO test protocol and test disparities can account for part of this effect. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that the global - local distinction is an unlikely explanation for the overestimated thresholds of TNO. Test protocol and disparities are one contributing factor. Potential additional factors include the nature of the task (TNO requires depth discrimination rather than detection) and the use of anaglyph red/green 3D glasses rather than polarizing filters, which may reduce binocular fusion.


Subject(s)
Amblyopia/diagnosis , Depth Perception/physiology , Sensory Thresholds/physiology , Strabismus/diagnosis , Vision Tests/methods , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Visual Acuity , Adolescent , Amblyopia/physiopathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Strabismus/physiopathology
19.
Emotion ; 17(4): 640-647, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27991818

ABSTRACT

Research on facial emotion processing has offered inconclusive results on whether certain emotional expressions, like happiness, are detected faster over others. A source of discrepancy among studies could stem from differences in physically salient features (e.g., teeth visibility), which are often left uncontrolled in this field of research. In Study 1, happy faces from the Karolinska Database Emotional Databse with visible, normal teeth unexpectedly obtained lower scores on intensity and prototypicality than the same faces with covered teeth. In Study 2, an eye-tracking methodology revealed that although faces with normal teeth drew participants' initial attention, participants spent more time looking at the eye region in faces with covered teeth, a region that previous research had found to be more informative of emotion than the mouth region. Overall, these results suggest that advantages often associated with certain emotional faces might be partially due to artifacts that should be systematically controlled for in future studies. (PsycINFO Database Record


Subject(s)
Emotions/physiology , Facial Expression , Smiling/psychology , Tooth/anatomy & histology , Adult , Female , Happiness , Humans , Male , Young Adult
20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28005254

ABSTRACT

The optomotor response has been widely used to investigate insect sensitivity to contrast and motion. Several studies have revealed the sensitivity of this response to frequency and contrast, but we know less about the spatial integration underlying this response. Specifically, few studies have investigated how the horizontal angular extent of stimuli influences the optomotor response. We presented mantises with moving gratings of varying horizontal extents at three different contrasts in the central or peripheral regions of their visual fields. We assessed the relative effectivity of different regions to elicit the optomotor response and modelled the dependency of the response on the angular extent subtended by stimuli at these different regions. Our results show that the optomotor response is governed by stimuli in the central visual field and not in the periphery. The model also shows that in the central region, the probability of response increases linearly with increase in horizontal extent up to a saturation point. Furthermore, the dependency of the optomotor response on the angular extent of the stimulus is modulated by contrast. We discuss the implications of our results for different modes of stimulus presentation and for models of the underlying mechanisms of motion detection in the mantis.


Subject(s)
Mantodea/physiology , Motor Activity , Visual Fields , Visual Perception , Animals , Linear Models , Models, Biological , Motor Activity/physiology , Photic Stimulation , Psychometrics , Visual Fields/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...