Secondary Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) with Low Dose Apixaban or Rivaroxaban: Results from a Patient Population with More than 2 Years of Median Follow-up.

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Nowadays, DOACs represent the gold standard for long-term anticoagulation, with low-intensity DOACs administration becoming increasingly used worldwide in such scenario. Albeit low-intensity apixaban and rivaroxaban are approved for clinical usage as secondary VTE prophylaxis, there are few literature data regarding their efficacy and safety with a long follow-up. Objectives: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose DOACs for VTE secondary prophylaxis in patients at high risk of VTE recurrence. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who required long-term anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrent VTE, treated with apixaban 2.5 mg BID or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily with a follow-up ≥ 12 months. Results: The examined patients were 323. The median low-dose DOAC administration time was 25.40 months (IQR 13.93-45.90). Twelve (3.7%) VTE recurrences were observed; 21 bleeding events were registered (6.5%), including one episode of Major bleeding (MB) (0.3%), 8 Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) (2.5%) and 12 minor bleeding (3.7%). No statistically significant difference in the rate of VTE recurrence and/or bleeding events emerged between the rivaroxaban and apixaban groups. Patients included in the study for multiple episodes of VTE presented a significantly higher risk of a new VTE recurrence during low-intensity DOAC. Conclusions: Our data suggest that low-dose DOACs may be effective and safe in secondary VTE prophylaxis in patients at high risk of VTE recurrence; however, attention might be needed in their choice in such a scenario for patients who experienced multiple episodes of VTE.

Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with cancer due to both the proinflammatory effect of neoplastic cells and to cardiotoxicity of anti-tumor therapies. Anticoagulation is still challenging in cancer patients due to increased bleeding risk related to specific neoplasms such us hematologic malignancies. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in AF patients affected by hematologic neoplasms. We included 97 patients on active anticancer treatment. The median follow-up was 25 months (range 10-108). No thromboembolic complications occurred, while 14 bleeding events were recorded: 1 major, 12 clinical relevant non major bleeding and 1 minor bleeding. Although retrospective and with a small number of enrolled patients, our data support the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients affected by hematologic malignancies suggesting caution to particular situations, such as thrombocytopenia.

D-dimer and reduced-dose apixaban for extended treatment after unprovoked venous thromboembolism: the Apidulcis study.

D-dimer assay is used to stratify patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) for the risk of recurrence. However, this approach was never evaluated since direct oral anticoagulants are available. With this multicenter, prospective cohort study, we aimed to assess the value of an algorithm incorporating serial D-dimer testing and administration of reduced-dose apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) only to patients with a positive test. A total of 732 outpatients aged 18 to 74 years, anticoagulated for ≥12 months after a first unprovoked VTE, were included. Patients underwent D-dimer testing with commercial assays and preestablished cutoffs. If the baseline D-dimer during anticoagulation was negative, anticoagulation was stopped and testing repeated after 15, 30, and 60 days. Patients with serially negative results (286 [39.1%]) were left without anticoagulation. At the first positive result, the remaining 446 patients (60.9%) were given apixaban for 18 months. All patients underwent follow-up planned for 18 months. The study was interrupted after a planned interim analysis for the high rate of primary outcomes (7.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5-11.2), including symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) recurrence, death for VTE, and major bleeding occurring in patients off anticoagulation vs that in those receiving apixaban (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.4-2.6; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 8.2; 95% CI, 3.2-25.3). In conclusion, in patients anticoagulated for ≥1 year after a first unprovoked VTE, the decision to further extend anticoagulation should not be based on D-dimer testing. The results confirmed the high efficacy and safety of reduced-dose apixaban against recurrences. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03678506.

Secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism with direct oral anticoagulants: comparison between patients with major congenital thrombophilia versus non-thrombophilic patients.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Congenital thrombophilia is a condition that predisposes to a higher incidence of VTE and often requires long-term anticoagulation for secondary prophylaxis. It is less clear the efficacy of DOACs in patients with major thrombophilia. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of full and reduced DOACs dose for VTE secondary prophylaxis, in patients affected by major congenital thrombophilia compared to a control group of patients with idiopathic recurrent VTE without thrombophilia. We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who required long-term anticoagulation for recurrent VTE, treated with DOACs, and compared the outcomes between patients affected by major thrombophilia and the control group. The examined patients were 209. The median time of DOACs therapy was 20 months (range 6-90). Two (2.7%) thrombotic events were observed in the subset affected by major congenital thrombophilia (n = 72) and five (3.6%) in the control group (n = 137) (p 0.73). Four (5.5%) hemorrhagic events were reported in the group with major thrombophilia; 21 (15.3%) in the other group (p 0.039). No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of efficacy and safety between DOACs at full and reduced dose. Our data suggest that DOACs may be effective and safe in the secondary VTE prophylaxis in patients affected by major congenital thrombophilia, also at reduced dose.

Single centre experience on Acquired Haemophilia A patients: Diagnosis, clinical management and analysis of factors predictive of response and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Acquired Haemophilia A (AHA) patients show a high response rate to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) but few information about predictors of response and outcome are reported. AIMS: We describe a large single-centre AHA cohort, investigating prognostic variables for the 'best response' (BR), time to BR (TTBR) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: A total of 61 patients were included, collecting data from clinical charts. RESULTS: A progressive increase in diagnoses, from 1978 to 2019, was observed. Fifty/56 patients (89%) underwent haemostatic therapy (rFVIIa 46%, aPCC 34%) with no significant differences in the response (rFVIIa 92.3% vs aPCC 100%) and no thromboembolic events. Sixty/61 patients underwent first-line IST with an initial response rate of 58.4%. The 12-months OS was 85%, the bleeding associated mortality rate 3% (2/61). The response rates at last observation were: CR 64%, PR 8%. We evaluated the influence of age, gender, associated conditions, IST, haemoglobin levels, FVIII:C, inhibitor titre on BR, TTBR and OS: post-partum AHA achieved the BR after a longer time than AHA related to other aetiologies or idiopathic (p = .05); in univariate analysis female sex (p = .03) and the achievement of BR (p = .001) had a positive impact on the OS while AHA secondary to neoplasms showed a shorter survival (p = .04); only the BR achievement remained significant in multivariate analysis (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Our data on response and survival confirmed those from the main registries. Post-partum AHA and BR achievement were significantly associated to a longer TTBR and a longer OS, respectively. Other predictors of outcome deserve to be explored in prospective studies.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with multiple myeloma: where are we and where are we going?

Venous thromboembolism is a common complication of patients with hematologic malignancies, due both to release of procoagulant factors by tumor cells and to external factors, such us drugs. In multiple myeloma patients, the risk is increased by use of immunomodulants, especially when associated to multidrug therapy, during the induction phase. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in myeloma patients is highly recommended but specific guidelines are still lacking. The most common approach is to stratify the thrombotic risk according to individual, myeloma-related and therapy-related risk factors and to use aspirin for all patients, except those with two or more thrombotic risk factors who should be treated with traditional oral or parenteral anticoagulant. A more controversial approach indicates for prophylaxis either anticoagulant or aspirin, regardless of risk stratification. Recent trials investigate prophylaxis in myeloma patients with direct oral anticoagulants, based on studies showing efficacy and safety of this new class of drugs in the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis in patients with any malignancy. The results of these trials are encouraging but they need to be confirmed by larger studies. An international consensus about best prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma on treatment is still missing. Therefore, thrombosis in multiple myeloma remains an ongoing issue.

Outcomes of long-term anticoagulant treatment for the secondary prophylaxis of splanchnic venous thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening disease usually related to different underlying clinical conditions. The risk of SVT recurrences is high over time in patients with an underlying permanent prothrombotic condition. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) represent the mainstay of treatment for SVT. Data about the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are reported in the literature for the treatment of acute SVT, but less is known about their application for the secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of long-term DOACs therapy in patients at high-risk of thrombosis, compared to VKA. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre study including 70 patients with SVT on long-term anticoagulant treatment with VKA followed-up at our Units between January 2017 and December 2019. All the patients were at high thrombotic risk defined as the presence of a permanent prothrombotic condition requiring long-term anticoagulation. During follow-up, 28 patients were shifted to DOACs and their clinical outcomes were compared to those of the patients who continued VKA therapy. All the arterial and venous thrombotic events of the splanchnic and extra-splanchnic districts as well as the haemorrhagic adverse events occurring during follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: Of the seventy patients enrolled in the study, 36 patients (51.4%) had a single-segment involvement thrombosis (28.5% of portal vein, 7.1% of superior mesenteric vein, 4.3% of splenic vein, 11.5% of hepatic veins) and 34 patients (48.6%) had multi-segment involvement at the time of diagnosis. 42 patients (60%) continued VKA therapy and 28 (40%) were switched to DOACs. Median follow-up was 6 years (range 2-8) during VKA and 1.9 years (range 1-5.2) during DOACs. The incidence of thrombotic events was similar between patients on VKA and those on DOACs. Patients on VKA developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and of the patients on DOACs 1 developed NSTEMI and 1 DVT. No major haemorrhagic events occurred. Minor bleedings occurred in 26% of patients on VKA and in none of the DOACs patients (P: 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight that DOACs could represent an effective and safe alternative to the VKA for secondary prophylaxis in SVT patients at high risk of thrombosis.

The treatment of upper extremities deep vein thrombosis related to thoracic outlet syndrome with direct oral anticoagulants.

Venous thoracic outlet syndrome (VTOS) is a manifestation of venous symptoms that occurs when the subclavian vein is compressed and it may present clinically with acute venous thrombosis of the axillo-subclavian vein. Evidence for the optimal approach to the management of this condition is sparse and actually anticoagulation alone is not considered an option. Herein we reported our experience with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with upper extremities deep vein thrombosis, due to VTOS, who refused endovascular approach or surgery.

Concomitant Administration of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In the last decades, the chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapeutic landscape has changed dramatically with the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with 10-year survival rates improving to up to 80%. Long-lasting TKI treatment, in particular with second-generation TKIs, has enabled clinicians to manage the onset of several side effects and other co-morbidities, such as atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated nine CML patients treated with TKIs between 2017 and 2020 who experienced atrial fibrillation or VTE and received concomitant administration of TKIs and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) outside clinical trials, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination. RESULTS: Median age was 66 years at CML diagnosis (range 52-73 years) and 69 years at the time of starting DOACs. A female predominance was observed. The median follow-up of concomitant DOAC and TKI administration was 8.5 months; edoxaban was administered in six patients and apixaban in two patients, and one patient received rivaroxaban. Regarding CML treatment, four patients received imatinib, two patients bosutinib, and three nilotinib. In eight patients DOACs were started for atrial fibrillation and in one patient for VTE. In none of the patients treated with the combination were additional symptomatic thrombotic adverse events or major bleedings reported. CONCLUSION: In this small case series, the use of DOACs in CML patients seemed feasible. Additional data on long-term outcomes including a larger cohort of CML patients treated with DOACs are, however, needed.

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with hematologic malignancies.

The anticoagulant treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies is low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), which is considered the safest in this particular patients setting. Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have proven their efficacy and safety in patients with cancer, their use can be challenging in patients with hematologic malignancies due to the peculiarity of these neoplasms: high thrombotic risk, possible onset of thrombocytopenia and concomitant anticancer therapies. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs for venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation in patients with hematologic malignancies and plasmatic DOACs level during anticancer therapy and at time of bleeding or thrombotic complications. We evaluated patients with hematologic malignancies treated with DOACs for venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation-therapy was maintained until the platelet count was ≥50 × 109 /L. In case of concomitant anticancer treatment and haemorrhagic or thrombotic events, we checked DOACs plasma levels (trough and peak). The patients evaluated were 135: 104/135 were on anticancer therapy. We did not observe either thrombotic or major haemorrhagic adverse events. Minor bleedings occurred in 10 patients and clinical relevant non-major (CRNM) in two patients. There was a statistically significant correlation between bleedings and myelodysplastic syndrome. DOACs resulted effective and safe in patients with hematologic malignancies. DOACs plasma level can be helpful in suggesting an early dose adjustment to prevent haemorrhagic adverse event in patients on concomitant anticancer therapy. Larger prospective studies including hematologic patients are warranted to confirm the safety and efficacy of DOACs.

Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of Mondor's disease not responding to low-molecular weight heparin.

Mondor's disease is a rare condition and usually treated with low-molecular weight heparin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Because of paucity of cases and for the usually spontaneous resolution, there is not a standard treatment strategy and the use of oral anticoagulation in controversial. We reported the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in the recurrent Mondor's disease refractory to standard therapy.

Satisfaction, quality of life and therapy adherence assessment in real life patients transitioning from vitamin K antagonists to direct oral anticoagulants.

Anticoagulant therapy has undergone a significant change since direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) introduction. Their obvious advantages including the fixed dose, the few interactions and less frequent controls, have made them the first choice anticoagulant therapy. More and more patients have therefore switched from therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to DOACs. Aim of our study was to assess the satisfaction, quality of life (QoL) and therapy adherence of patients who switched from VKA to DOACs therapy. This single center study evaluated satisfaction and QoL of 107 patients who switched from VKA to DOACs therapy through Anti-Clot Treatment Scale and SF-36 respectively. The questionnaires were administered before therapy change, after 3 months of DOACs therapy and then annually. We also evaluated DOACs therapy adherence with a questionnaire administered each visit and through the measures of DOACs plasma levels. Patients' satisfaction and QoL were high during VKA therapy, but with DOACs we observed an improvement after the first 3 months and then maintained over the time of DOACs therapy. DOACs adherence was excellent, also confirmed by DOACs plasma levels.

PICC-related upper deep venous thrombosis in patients with hematological malignancies. Management of anticoagulant therapy according to the platelet count.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) for central venous access are frequently used in patients with hematological malignancies. Their use may be complicated by upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT). Additionally, hematological patients are frequently thrombocytopenic and the optimal management of UEDVT in patients with thrombocytopenia is challenging and poorly standardized. We retrospectively analyzed 50 adult patients affected by hematological malignancies who presented a PICC-associated UEDVT. UEDVT treatment was compared in 3 groups: patients with a platelet count ≥ 50 × 109/l (group1) who underwent a therapeutic dose of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux 7.5 mg; patients with a platelet count < 50 × 109/l and ≥ 30 × 109/l (group 2) who were treated with a 50% reduced dose of LMWH or fondaparinux 5 mg; patients with platelets < 30 × 109/l (group 3) were observed and treated with anticoagulants when the count was > 30 × 109//l. At the onset of thrombosis, 36 patients were in group 1, 8 in group 2 and 6 in group 3. We observed no hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications related to the anticoagulant therapy; length of treatment was comparable between groups 1 and 2 (51 days group 1 vs 50 days group 2). Reduced doses of LMWH or fondaparinux may represent a safe and effective therapeutic approach in patients with moderate thrombocytopenia (< 50 × 109/l and ≥ 30 × 109/l) and a PICC-associated UEDVT.

Response to Interferon-Free Direct Antivirals (DAAS) Treatment in Hcv-Related Subcutaneous Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphoma with Lipoma-Like Presentation: Report of Two Cases.

Many epidemiological, biological and therapeutic studies have extensively investigated the etiological link between HCV infection and B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). Large experiences in the literature demonstrated HCV-related indolent NHL regression after antiviral therapy. While the response to interferon-ribavirin-based antiviral therapy is well documented, evidence of the efficacy of interferon-free Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs) in this subset of lymphoma is also currently increasing. Splenic and Nodal Marginal zone Lymphoma (MZL) are frequently associated with HCV chronic infection. In this article we report two cases of HCV-related MZL with an unusual presentation, subcutaneous "lipoma-like" nodules, treated with DAAs. Both patients, a 59-years-old woman and a 72-years-old man, were affected by HCV chronic infection since several years and were referred to our Institute for a diagnosis of MZL with subcutaneous presentation. Given the possible etiological link with HCV infection, both patients were treated with DAAS. A Sustained virological response (SVR) was reached after few weeks of therapy and at the end of treatment a clinically and radiologically documented reduction of MZL localizations, persisting to date, were obtained in both patients. The two clinical cases presented in this article confirm the efficacy of DAA's as first-line treatment in HCV related NHL, also in this rare entity of MZL with subcutaneous presentation.