Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 170(1): 36-42, 2013 Dec 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24196314

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Newer generation everolimus-eluting stents (EES) improve clinical outcome compared to early generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). We investigated whether the advantage in safety and efficacy also holds among the high-risk population of diabetic patients during long-term follow-up. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2009, a total of 1963 consecutive diabetic patients treated with the unrestricted use of EES (n=804), SES (n=612) and PES (n=547) were followed throughout three years for the occurrence of cardiac events at two academic institutions. The primary end point was the occurrence of definite stent thrombosis. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 1.0% of EES, 3.7% of SES and 3.8% of PES treated patients ([EES vs. SES] adjusted HR=0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.88; [EES vs. PES] adjusted HR=0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.67). Similarly, patients treated with EES had a lower risk of target-lesion revascularization (TLR) compared to patients treated with SES and PES ([EES vs. SES], 5.6% vs. 11.5%, adjusted HR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.55-0.83; [EES vs. PES], 5.6% vs. 11.3%, adjusted HR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.77). There were no differences in other safety end points, such as all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and MACE. CONCLUSION: In diabetic patients, the unrestricted use of EES appears to be associated with improved outcomes, specifically a significant decrease in the need for TLR and ST compared to early generation SES and PES throughout 3-year follow-up.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Drug-Eluting Stents/trends , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Sirolimus/administration & dosage , Aged , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Everolimus , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Endothelium ; 13(6): 431-9, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17169775

ABSTRACT

Technologies in interventional Cardiology have evolved from balloon to mechanical ablation, atherectomy, stenting, and brachytherapy to current drug eluting interventional strategies. New challenges are to develop techniques that not only prevent restenosis, but also promote vascular and endothelial healing after (balloon) injury. Endothelial healing approaches range from preventing endothelial injury to restoring endothelial function and reendothelialization by pharmacotherapy and cell therapy. These novel healing strategies warrant further exploration as they may represent an alternative to drug-eluting stent approaches.


Subject(s)
Coronary Stenosis/drug therapy , Drug Delivery Systems , Endothelium, Vascular/drug effects , Regeneration/drug effects , Stents , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Restenosis/prevention & control , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Endothelium, Vascular/physiology , Humans , Models, Biological , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Sirolimus/administration & dosage , Sirolimus/therapeutic use , Vascular Diseases/therapy , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL