A new method for predicting alcohol relapse in patients undergoing liver transplantation for alcohol-related liver failure: Barratt scale.

Background and Aim: Alcohol-induced liver disease has become one of the major causes of chronic liver disease worldwide with the increasing use of alcohol in society. The most important step in treatment is cessation of alcohol consumption. In patients with advanced liver disease, the most effective treatment is liver transplantation. Careful evaluation of patients with alcoholic liver disease before transplantation can help identify those at high risk of relapsing. Materials and Methods: Of a total of 42 patients who underwent liver transplantation for alcohol-related liver failure in our hospital between 2011 and 2022, 26 surviving patients were included in the study. Patient data were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic data, MELD score, history of alcohol consumption, alcohol treatment, post-transplant prognosis and survival were analyzed. The Barratt Impulsivity Scale-11 Short Form (BIS-11 SF) was applied to the surviving patients for impulsivity analysis to predict the possibility of relapse. Results: Of the 26 patients who were included in the study, all were male. The mean age at transplantation was 53 (31-71) years. Mean MELD score was 22.31 (9-36). 12 patients (46.2%) received living donor liver transplantation and 14 patients (53.8%) received cadaveric liver transplantation. 25 patients (96.2%) had no post-transplant dependence, while 1 patient (3.8%) had post-transplant dependence. 5 patients (19.2%) continued to consume alcohol after transplantation. Conclusion: In our study, we observed that patients with high motor impulsivity tendency according to BSI-11 SF had alcohol relapse. We believe that revising this scale with more detailed questions for alcohol-dependent liver patients and applying it to patients before transplantation will be effective in better selection for transplantation and guiding patients to appropriate therapy and thus preventing relapse after transplantation.

Irritable bowel syndrome in renal transplant patients: prevalence, link with quality of life, anxiety, and depression.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal complications are common in renal transplant recipients and may arise from any part of the gastrointestinal tract. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is highly common in the general population, but the status is not known in renal transplant patients. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of IBS and its association with health-related quality of life (HRQOL), anxiety, and depression in renal transplant patients. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-eight patients were enrolled in this study. Sociodemographic and laboratory variables were recorded. Severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms and HRQOL were assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Short Form 36 (SF-36), respectively. Diagnosis of IBS was based on Rome III criteria. RESULTS: The mean age was 38 ± 10 years and 61% were male. The mean transplant duration was 62 ± 54 months. Among 198 patients, 55 (27%) had IBS. Patients with IBS had lower SF-36 scores and had higher depressive and anxiety symptoms than patients without IBS. CONCLUSIONS: IBS is highly prevalent in renal transplant patients. The presence of IBS is closely related with HRQOL anxiety and depression.

Planning a social activity to improve psychological well-being and quality of life of hemodialysis patients: a pilot study.

We aimed to investigate the impact of social activity on anxiety-depression, self-esteem and quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Ninety-one patients were recruited to the current study. Of these, 31 patients wanted to take part in a theater play, while 60 patients (group C) did not. Thirty-one patients were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (N = 15) started activities immediately and group B (N = 16) was assigned to a waiting list to be included in the activity of theater acting four months later. Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale and World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale short form (WHOQOL-BREF) were used to compare psychological parameters and quality of life of the groups before and after the social activity. The patients who were younger, more literate, and wealthier, had longer disease duration, and who were feeling physically and psychologically well, were willing to participate in social activity. The impact of social activity was evaluated between group A and C. After the social activity, there were significant differences in terms of depression (P = 0.008), self-esteem (P = 0.003), and physical (P = 0.04) and psychological (P = 0.05) sub-dimensions of quality of life between the groups. The depression score of the patients in group A decreased while their self-esteem increased, but the increase in the physical and psychological sub-dimension scores of quality of life scale did not reach statistical significance. This pilot study showed that social activity primarily improved depression and self-esteem in hemodialysis patients.

Hopelessness in Turkish cancer inpatients: the relation of hopelessness with psychological and disease-related outcomes.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the hopelessness level and the relationship of depression, anxiety and disease-related factors to the presence of hopelessness among Turkish patients with cancer. Ninety-five patients hospitalized for cancer treatments were recruited for current study. Data were collected by using a demographic questionnaire, the Pain Numeric Rating Scale, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale. The mean hopelessness score was 5.20+/-4.39. There were significant differences in terms of hopelessness between the patients who had metastasis and pain as compared with those without metastasis and pain (p<0.05). There were also found that significant correlation between hopelessness and depression and between hopelessness and anxiety (r=0.721; r=0.645, respectively, p<0.001). Foreword stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that the independent predictors of hopelessness were depression score and thr presence of metastasis (F=55.133; p<0.001). The findings suggest that levels of hopelessness among cancer patients with pain and metastasis are higher than among those without pain and metastasis, and that the severity of pain, anxiety, and depression is positively correlated with hopelessness level. The assessment of hopelessness, pain, anxiety and depression levels of the patients with cancer should be an essential part of health care practice. Therefore, when arranging care assessment, to evaluate hopelessness could help professionals to appropriately refer patients to further psychological care resources.

[Alcohol use-related problems in women]. / Kadinlarda alkol kullanimi ve buna bagli sorunlar.

It is well known that the prevalence of alcohol use disorders is increasing and represents an important health problem worldwide. Nonetheless, there are an insufficient number of population-based prevalence studies on alcohol use disorders among the general population and women in Turkey. Among the studies performed in Turkey, it has been reported that alcohol use disorders are more common among males and that alcohol use among females is increasing, as in other countries. The alcohol use among females differs from males' in many respects. The purpose of this article was to review the physical differences between males and females relevant to the metabolism of alcohol, and to organic and mental problems caused by alcohol use. In addition we sought to draw attention to the necessity for effective preventative and treatment methods for women.

Variables affecting patient satisfaction in breast surgery: a cross-sectional sample of Turkish women with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In Turkey, despite the fact that breast cancer accounts for 24.1% of all cancer in women, a very small number of these patients receive breast reconstruction. This low percentage would seem to indicate that there are several factors affecting the decision of which surgical procedure should be selected. The aim of this study was to establish the demographical, medical, and psychological factors associated with the breast cancer patient's decision-making process, and assess their satisfaction with the type of surgery received. METHOD: We assessed long-term satisfaction with the type of surgery received; satisfaction with the information process by which the surgery decision is taken; feelings of ambivalence or regret regarding the type of surgery received in both mastectomy (n = 50) and breast reconstruction patients (n = 25). Additionally, breast cancer survivors were compared with age-matched healthy control volunteers (n = 50) in terms of demographics, body image and self-esteem, which could be expected to affect their preferences. We administered a demographical and medical information form, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, Clinical Version (SCID-I), the Body Cathexis Scale (BCS); and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). RESULTS: In both groups, women with a low income and less education were more likely to experience decision regret or low satisfaction. Moreover, total mastectomy-alone patients had lower self-esteem compared to reconstructive surgery patients and healthy women. CONCLUSION: Early stage breast cancer is a chronic disease and patients have to live with the consequences of their decision for many years. At the same time, the type of surgery is decided on when patients are in an acute phase and under intense pressure. Therefore, the decision making process needs to be explored more, especially breast cancer patients with less education and low income need better assistance and more detailed explanation of their options.