Comparison of anatomical and functional outcomes of vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling in recalcitrant diabetic macular edema with and without traction in Indian patients.

PURPOSE: To study and compare the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with the internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the eyes with recalcitrant diabetic macular edema (DME) with and without vitreomacular traction. METHODS: A comparative prospective interventional study was undertaken in which group 1 included 45 eyes of 45 patients with DME with vitreomacular tractional component and group 2 included 45 eyes of 45 patients with recalcitrant DME without a tractional component. Both groups underwent standard PPV with ILM peeling. All the patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The parameters evaluated were changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) parameters, and occurrence of any intraoperative/postoperative surgical complication. RESULTS: The mean CMT improved significantly from 540.6 and 490.2 µm at the baseline to 292.5 and 270.6 µm at 6 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean BCVA logMAR improved from 0.78 ± 0.21 to 0.62 ± 0.22 in group 1 and 0.84 ± 0.19 to 0.65 ± 0.21 in group 2 at 6 months follow-up which was not statistically significant. The improvement in the mfERG was seen in group 2 as a significant increase in P1 wave amplitude in ring 2 (2-5°) (P < 0.004) and a significant decrease in P 1 wave implicit time in ring 1 (central 2°) (P < 0.001). None of the eyes suffered from the loss of BCVA or any major surgical complication in either group. CONCLUSION: PPV in recalcitrant DME provides good anatomical outcomes and the results are comparable in DME with and without a tractional component.

Posterior polar cataract: Minimizing risks.

BACKGROUND: Comparing surgical outcomes of management of posterior polar cataract, a congenital cataract, which is difficult to manage surgically and has been associated with poor surgical outcomes. METHODS: 46 eyes of 38 patients with posterior polar cataract underwent phacoemulsification and PCIOL implantation. RESULTS: In a prospective analytical study, 46 eyes of 38 patients with posterior polar cataracts underwent surgery at a zonal hospital of the armed forces. The posterior polar cataract incidence was 1.23 per 1000 with confidence interval (CI) of 0.0012. Of the 46 eyes operated, 6 had a posterior capsular rupture (PCR) (13.04%). The PCR incidence in normal cataracts is reported at approx. 1.1%, whereas, various studies have reported incidence of 6-36% in posterior polar cataracts. 41 eyes achieved a visual acuity of 6/12 or better (89.13%) and 39 eyes of 6/9 or better (84.78%). 4 patients had amblyopia (8.6%), Two patients developed macular edema (4.34%). Mean follow-up was 7 months (range 3-11 months). There was no case of nucleus drop or retinal detachment. CONCLUSION: Posterior polar cataracts are a surgical challenge. With controlled surgery, well defined techniques, a good surgical outcome can be achieved with reduced incidence of PCR.