Proposal for individual treatment by tubal occlusion factor based on the results of salpingoscopic salpingoplasty.

AIM: As a treatment for tubal infertility, falloposcopic tuboplasty (FT) is one of the options for patients who wish to conceive naturally. Based on the results of FT, we propose an appropriate time of transitioning to assisted reproductive technology (ART) for tubal infertility. OBJECTS AND METHODS: We examined the outcomes of cases of tubal infertility during the period from June 1999 through March 2021 who were performed tuboplasty at our hospital using the FT catheter system under laparoscopy. RESULTS: The number of treated cases was 828. There were 243 cases of endometriosis and 119 cases of genital chlamydial infection. By FT, 712 cases (86.0%) were successfully recanalized. Of the 712 cases, 189 conceived naturally (26.5%) and miscarriages were 23 cases (12.2%), ectopic pregnancies were 8 cases (4.2%). The mean duration from FT to pregnancy was 6.5 months in natural pregnancy group, 90% of them were pregnant within 14 months. In endometriosis cases, the pregnancy rate after FT did not change significantly among clinical stage. CONCLUSIONS: Even when the fallopian tube was recanalized by FT, if the couple is unable to conceive naturally, they had better to consider switching to ART at about 14 months. When the couples with endometriosis consider switching to ART, we suggest deciding without considering the rASRM stage.

Efficacy of single-stage breast-conserving treatment using multicatheter partial breast brachytherapy evaluated by GEC-ESTRO phase 3 trial.

PURPOSE: The GEC-ESTRO has reported the equivalent outcomes of partial breast irradiation (PBI) using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MCB) to whole breast irradiation (WBI) in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). We performed single-stage BCT with partial breast brachytherapy by intraoperative catheter placement. After the categorization of patients into inclusion and exclusion criteria on this trial, our databases were evaluated in order to translate it to Japanese patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing BCT were retrospectively examined between November 2007 and December 2015. The technique is an open-cavity implant with a dose of 32 Gy in 8 fractions. The 4-year clinical outcomes of MCB-PBI were evaluated in the 2 distinct categories, and the comparison of the outcomes of MCB-PBI with WBI was performed in patients with unfavorable features. RESULTS: Of a total of 501 lesions undergoing BCT, 301 lesions were treated with MCB-PBI and 200 lesions with WBI. At the median follow-up time of 52 months, the 4-year rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR)-free, disease-free (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with MCB-PBI and WBI were 98.9% vs. 98.0% (p = 0.56), 97.0% vs. 95.3% (p = 0.78), and 99.6% vs. 98.2% (p = 0.38), respectively. Although in exclusion cohort treated with MCB-PBI, IBTR-free, and disease-free survival were significantly worse than in inclusion cohort, non-significantly worse outcomes was demonstrated than in exclusion cohort with WBI; IBTR-free survival (95.0% vs. 97.2%, p = 0.24), and disease-free survival (95.0% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage BCT using MCB-PBI offered similar tumor control rates compering to WBI. However, further research is needed to define the benefit for patients with an exclusion criteria.

Relationships between catastrophic thought, bodily sensations and physical symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Researchers have recently begun to seek cognitive explanations for physical symptoms with no obvious biological cause. Concepts such as somatization, somatosensory amplification, and somatosensory catastrophizing have been invoked to explain these phenomena. Somatosensory amplification occurs when these bodily sensations become stronger and more painful. Somatosensory catastrophizing is the tendency to attribute these bodily sensations to unbearable functional modulation or as signs of serious illness. This causes the sufferer to pay excessive attention to these physical sensations. However, there is no scale for evaluating somatosensory catastrophizing, and there are no standard diagnostic criteria. There were two objectives for this study: to develop a scale for evaluating somatosensory catastrophizing and to investigate relationships between somatosensory amplification, somatosensory catastrophizing, and physical symptoms. METHODS: In the first part of this study, in which we developed the scale, there were 231 student participants with an average age of 20.1 years. Of these, 57% of the participants were female. In the second part of the study, there were two groups of participants. The first group consisted of 158 non-patient subjects, 56% of whom were female, with an average age of 20.2 years. There were 33 outpatients receiving treatment for somatoform disorders in the second group. The average age of these participants, of whom 67% were female, was 48.8 years. The second part of the study was conducted using standardized self-rating questionnaires to assess somatosensory amplification and catastrophizing. RESULTS: We developed a 27-item scale, which we have called the Somatosensory catastrophizing scale (SSCS). The SSCS assesses five key areas, and our analysis confirmed it to be valid and highly reliable. The scale identified that the patient group from the second part of the study scored more highly than the control group for both somatosensory amplification and catastrophizing. Additionally, the results of covariance structure analyses revealed a significant causal relationship of the form "somatosensory amplifcation" via "somatosensory catastrophizing" to "physical symptoms". This relationship held in both groups of participants. The key difference between the patient and non-patient groups was that somatosensory catastrophizing had a greater impact on the physical symptoms of the participants in the patient group. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we developed the SSCS, which enables us to measure somatosensory catastrophizing empirically. We then clarified the relationship between somatosensory amplification, somatosensory catastrophizing, and physical symptoms. In the future, we expect to be able to apply our new understanding to developing intervention techniques to mitigate the physical symptoms caused by somatosensory catastrophizing.

Impact of young age on local control after partial breast irradiation in Japanese patients with early stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) for breast-conserving therapy (BCT). A randomised phase 3 trial demonstrated that PBI using multicatheter brachytherapy had an equivalent rate of local recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival as compared to WBI. However, limited data are available on PBI efficacy for young patients with breast cancer. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive patients with Tis-2 (≤ 3 cm) N0-1 breast cancer who underwent BCT. For PBI, patients received radiotherapy using multicatheter brachytherapy in an accelerated manner with a dose of 32 Gy in eight fractions over 5-6 days. For WBI, patients received an external beam radiation therapy that was applied to the entire breast with a total dose of 50 Gy in fractions of 2 Gy for 5 weeks. Two hundred seventy-four patients with 278 lesions received PBI; 190 patients with 193 lesions received WBI. RESULTS: Patients aged <50 years including 98 women with 99 lesions receiving PBI and 85 women with 85 lesions receiving WBI were selected. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rate was 3.0 and 2.4 % by PBI and WBI, respectively (P = 0.99). There was no significant difference in 4-year probability of disease-free survival (97.6 and 91.4 % for PBI and WBI, respectively; P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of PBI efficacy in young patients in Asia. Although it is a nonrandomized retrospective chart review of a small cohort of patients with a relatively short follow-up period, PBI may be a better option than WBI following BCS in some young patients with breast cancer.

Comparison of radiation dose to the left anterior descending artery by whole and partial breast irradiation in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole breast irradiation (WBI) is the standard of care for breast cancer patients. However, there is a risk of coronary events with WBI therapy. In this study, we compared the radiation dose in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in patients receiving partial breast irradiation (PBI) with WBI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated consecutive patients who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy after BCS between October 2008 and July 2014. Whole breast irradiation patients received 50 Gy in fractions of 2 Gy to the entire breast. Partial breast irradiation was performed using multicatheter brachytherapy at a dose of 32 Gy in eight fractions. The mean and maximal cumulative doses to LAD were calculated. The radiotherapeutic biologically effective dose of PBI was adjusted to WBI, and radiation techniques were compared. RESULTS: Of 379 consecutive patients with 383 lesions receiving radiotherapy (151 WBI and 232 PBI lesions), 82 WBI and 100 PBI patients were analyzed. In WBI patients, the mean and maximal cumulative doses for left-sided breast cancer (2.13 ± 0.11 and 8.19 ± 1.21 Gy, respectively) were significantly higher than those for right-sided (0.37 ± 0.02 and 0.56 ± 0.03 Gy, respectively; p < 0.0001). In PBI patients with left-sided breast cancer, the doses for tumors in inner quadrants or central location (2.54 ± 0.21 and 4.43 ± 0.38 Gy, respectively) were significantly elevated compared to outer quadrants (1.02 ± 0.17 and 2.10 ± 0.29 Gy, respectively; p < 0.0001). After the adjustment, the doses in PBI patients were significantly reduced in patients with tumors only in outer quadrants (1.12 ± 0.20 and 2.43 ± 0.37 Gy, respectively; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor control and dose to LAD should be considered during treatment since PBI may reduce the risk of coronary artery disease especially in patients with lateral tumors in the left breast.

A patient with medulloblastoma in its early developmental stage.

Medulloblastoma is the most frequent malignant brain tumor of the posterior fossa in children and is considered an embryonal tumor. It has been suggested that medulloblastomas be categorized into 4 distinct molecular subgroups- WNT (DKK1), SHH (SFRP1), Group 3 (NPR3), or Group 4 (KCNA1)-since each subgroup is distinct and there is no overlap. The authors report on a 13-year-old boy with medulloblastoma. He presented with sudden-onset nausea and vomiting due to intratumoral hemorrhage. The medulloblastoma was thought to be in an early developmental stage because the tumor volume was extremely small. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the tumor was mainly composed of DKK1- and NPR3-positive areas. The individual areas of the tumor stained only for DKK1 or NPR3, with no overlap-that is, DKK1 and NPR3 expression were mutually exclusive. Samples obtained by laser microdissection of individual areas and subjected to mass spectrometry confirmed that the expression patterns of proteins were different. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for chromosome 6 showed there were 2 distinct types of cells that exhibited monosomy or disomy of chromosome 6. These results demonstrated that distinct subtypes of medulloblastoma may be present within a single tumor, an observation that has not been previously reported. Our findings in this case indicate that early-stage medulloblastoma may include more than 1 distinct subtype and hint at factors involved in the origin and development of medulloblastomas.

[Factors affecting adherence of breast cancer patients to adjuvant hormonal therapy and validation of the evaluation method].

BACKGROUND: The long-term use of hormonal therapy is important for the treatment of patients with breast cancer. Therefore, we evaluated the methods used for measuring adherence and examined factors that influence compliance. Our goal was to improve overall adherence to the treatment. METHODS: Retrospective analyses by using electronic medical records and questionnaires were performed on 294 patients with breast cancer. The patients were classified into 2 groups based on the mean number of days when a dose was missed over a period of 28 days: group A(range, 0-3 days, n=272)and group B (range, B4 days, n=22). Factors that may influence adherence, including age, duration of hormonal therapy, the drug administered in hormonal therapy, the surgical method, axillary lymph node dissection, and adjuvant chemotherapy, were compared between both groups. RESULTS: The adherence rates calculated from electronic medical records and questionnaires were similar. The proportion of patients younger than 50 years was 30% in group A and 50% in group B(p<0.05). Additionally, there was a difference in the duration of hormone therapy(752 days vs 981 days in groups A and B, respectively; p< 0.05). Additional factors that are related to low-risk cancer-related procedures, such as breast conserving surgery, may also be linked to poor adherence. CONCLUSION: Young age and long duration of hormonal therapy are possibly related to poor adherence. Therefore, pharmacists should identify and manage these patients to increase adherence.

A human immunodeficiency virus screening algorithm to address the high rate of false-positive results in pregnant women in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing is essential for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission. However, false-positive results of screening testing are a concern as they may cause unnecessary emotional stress to pregnant women waiting for confirmatory test results. In regions with an extremely low prevalence, the positive predictive values of screening are unacceptably low rate. Here, we propose a HIV screening algorithm consisting of serial two fourth-generation enzyme immunoassays to reduce the number of false-positive screening results. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: When 6461 pregnant women presenting to two maternity hospitals located in the Tokyo metropolitan area of Japan from September, 2004 to January, 2006 were tested using Enzygnost HIV Integral as a first screening test, 27 showed positive reactions. When these positive reaction samples were tested using VIDAS HIV DUO Quick as a second screening test, only one of them had a positive reaction, and the remaining 26 were nonreactive. Confirmatory Western blots and nucleic acid amplification test also showed that one was positive and the remaining 26 were negative; the subject who was positive with the confirmatory tests was identical to the subject who was positive with the second screening test. Thus, by adding the second screening test, the false-positive rate was improved from 0.4% to 0%, and the positive predictive value from 3.7% to 100%, compared with the single screening test. CONCLUSION: By applying our serial screening algorithm to HIV testing in maternity hospitals, many uninfected pregnant women would not need to receive confirmatory tests and be subjected to emotional turmoil while waiting for their confirmatory test results. This algorithm would be suitable for HIV testing of pregnant women living in low prevalence regions such as Japan.

Identification of potential serum markers for endometrial cancer using protein expression profiling.

OBJECTIVES: Screening method of endometrial cancer (EC) has not been established yet. Our study was to explore serum biomarkers of EC patients using surface-enhanced laser desorption and ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS). METHODS: Serum samples from 65 EC patients and 40 controls were analyzed by SELDI-TOF MS (training set). Single- and multi-variant analyses were performed to compare protein profiles in serum of EC patients and healthy controls. Subsequently, blind test set including 40 EC patients and 40 controls were analyzed for validation. RESULTS: A panel of four biomarker candidates were selected in training set analysis. These markers could also distinguish stage I patients from controls. Among them, two biomarkers were purified and identified as apolipoprotein A1 and a modified form of apolipoprotein C1. Screening for blind test set using dual-biomarker analysis yielded a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Involvement of apolipoproteins with EC is first suggested in this study. In addition to possibility of screening method for EC, findings of these new biomarkers might be related with carcinogenesis or predisposition to EC.

Inhibitory effects of bisphosphonates on the proliferation of human ovarian cancer cell lines and the mechanism.

Bisphosphonates are now well established as successful agents for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and corticosteroid-induced bone loss. Bisphosphonates have also recently become important in the management of cancer-induced bone disease, and they now have a widely recognized role for patients with multiple myeloma and bone metastases secondary to breast cancer and prostate cancer. Recent studies suggest that, besides the strong antiosteoclastic activity, the efficacy of such compounds in the oncological setting could also be due to direct anti-tumor effect. However, the effect of bisphosphonates to ovarian and endometrial cancers has not been elucidated. Thus, we examined the direct effect of bisphosphonates on the various ovarian cancer cell lines. Except for etidronate, all of bisphosphonates examined had the direct inhibitory effects on proliferation of all ovarian cancer cell lines used. Especially, pamidronate had the most marked inhibitory effect and inhibited dose-dependently the proliferation of ovarian cancer cell lines. KFr 13 cells among ovarian cancer cell lines used was the most sensitive to pamidronate and the caspase 3 activity was markedly stimulated by treatment with pamidronate, suggesting induction of apoptosis.

The effect of single weekly paclitaxel in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent or persistent advanced ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We have reported that single weekly paclitaxel has moderate activity in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients and is associated with a favorable toxicity profile. The purpose of this study was to reconfirm the effect of weekly paclitaxel in more number of cases. METHODS: Although 39 patients were enrolled, 37 patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer previously treated with between one and three chemotherapeutic regimens containing platinum were eligible. Patients had measurable or assessable disease defined by clinical exam, radiographic studies, or serum CA 125. One cycle of treatment consisted of paclitaxel 80 mg/m2/week in 1-h infusion, 3 weeks on, 1 week off, and repeated at least twice. Two patients were withdrawn because of refusal of further treatment for neuropathy after the first cycle. Clinical responses were defined by established criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included in this intent-to-treat study. The overall clinical response rate was 45.9% (5 complete responses, 12 partial responses). The clinical response rate in patients with measurable tumor was 25.0% (2 complete responses, 1 partial response), while that in patients without measurable tumor and with assessable CA 125 levels was 56.0% (3 complete responses, 11 partial responses). Clinical response rate in patients with chemotherapy-free interval more than 6 months had about twice higher than that in patients with chemotherapy-free interval less than 6 months. The clinical response rate by number of prior regimens revealed that as number of prior regimens increases, the response rate decreases. CONCLUSION: Weekly paclitaxel has significant antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian carcinoma and warrants as second or third line chemotherapy in such setting.